Hi, welcome to Supernatural Wiki! Thanks for your edit to the User talk:General MGD 109 page.
Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help you with anything!
Also note that we are in the process of converting articles written in the present tense to the past tense. So you are welcome to edit any such article you come across. Once again, Welcome! ImperiexSeed (talk) 23:50, March 22, 2014 (UTC)
Sorry about that. I didn't particularly want to, but it was the easiest way. I'm trying to lower the level of conflict on the wiki, its been quite for a weeks now, but the tension is still the air. I couldn't really rebuff the arguments placed against me. So it was just the only answer, I'm sorry. General MGD 109 (talk) 00:38, March 23, 2014 (UTC)
Okay, I've done an investigation, and I think someone's trying to antagonise you, as I can find no linkage between the user Masters Voice and this particular cyberbully. Further more I talked to him, and he's said he doesn't want anything to do with the people who are bothering you. General MGD 109 (talk) 20:12, June 3, 2014 (UTC)
I am aware of all that, and I've already talked to Becky about that discussion, and they told me nothing which controdicts what you have said, or I have heard from other sources. We also agreed to take to much truth out of it, I can assure you the matter is well in hand, so kindly don't harras them in the future. General MGD 109 (talk) 17:03, June 12, 2014 (UTC)
Okay Reson, now I think your a good person and I acknowledge that a lot of people have been horrible to you, so I've tried to be tactful in the past, but I think is time I was blunt. Your evidence, although suspicious is at best circumstantual, its not enough to ban some one. On your behalf by this point I have performed several re-examinations of your case and investigations of your claims, and none of them have come up with anything solid. So unless you can find anything concrete, its not going to happen. I'm sorry about being forced to ban you, but it happened, and it didn't happen because what Master's Voice said, he might have been a driving force, but it happened because the evidence against you was concrete, namely you did do to many of the things you were accused of. I still don't think you are a bad guy, but that happened, its happened. And even if you do prove that Master's Voice is a cyberbully who is targetting you, it won't change the fact your banned. It will just mean there banned as well. I'm sorry, but thats whats going to happen. I look forward to seeing you back when the ban runs out, but until then you can't come back. Believe me I am sorry, but thats how it is, its just part of the job. See you in January Reson. General MGD 109 (talk) 18:44, June 15, 2014 (UTC)
What do you mean? You were only banned for one year, that will expire in January 2015. Indeed I have not forgotten, but he has made no secret of he fact he dislikes you, I've talked to him about it and he's agreed to stop. If he doesn't I will take further action. I'm sorry Reson.General MGD 109 (talk) 18:52, June 15, 2014 (UTC)
Okay, all that is very serious, he has agreed not to bother you again, but if it makes you feel better I will discuss it with my fellow Admins. Tell me, before I take the other thing any further, can you be sure that this admin is trustworthy? The whole site seems to want to stick a kick me sign on your back. General MGD 109 (talk) 19:05, June 15, 2014 (UTC)
Okay Reson, I had a long talk with both him and my fellow Admin on the matter. And I'm happy to say its resolved. He's agreed not to bother you again, provided he doesn't catch you saying things about him. He's also agreed to go into volentary exile from the wiki for a while, in response to things he did on Disney wiki. According to him the reasons for what he did, where he believed you were a potential danger to children on those wiki's, and as that hit to close to home for him, he took it upon himself to warn others, and he went overboard. He's agreed not to do it any more, so you should have no more problems with him. General MGD 109 (talk) 19:54, June 16, 2014 (UTC)
He is lying. He is the cyberbully known as "Satan". He needs to be banned, and myself unbanned and allowed to reinstitute the pages on the cyberbullies circle he is part of. Moleman 9000 21:00, June 16, 2014 (UTC)
I've checked there is no linkage or evidence he is, I think someone's playing you for the fool mate, there just telling you wha you want to hear so that they can laugh at you behind your back. We've agreed to a short volentary exile as opposed to a ban, I gave you the same offer and you turned me down. I'm afraid that is not possible, all pages on Cyberbullies have been offically banned, it was decided that really the do nothing but cause problems.General MGD 109 (talk) 21:41, June 16, 2014 (UTC)
Including Cyberbullies and Trolls just creates problems, while they are no doubt awful people, I don't think they rate the same as murders, tyrants and rapists. The fact we don't know who they really are also limits what we can do. As such there banned and there not coming back, I banned a user today for creating pages for them (including one of them was you), I'm sorry about your online life, if you want them to go away delete your online accounts and start again under a new name, aswell as avoid the sights where they go. Its whats for the best.General MGD 109 (talk) 18:22, June 17, 2014 (UTC)
Look Reson, while she is indeed a horrible person. There is a reason we got rid of those sorts of pages, the do know good. If I allow one, I'll have to let them all in (and there are quite a few people who think you should be) and all it will do is lead to constant arguing, whinning and complaining. Willow's no doubt horrible, but she's a criminal, she is just the online version of a bully. And like any bully she'll say and do anything to antagonise you. If you know she's so horrible, just don't talk to here. Were online, you don't have to reply, I know it can be difficult to ignore. But this isn't real life, you don't have to be confronted. Don't talk to them, don't pay attention to them, and don't respond to them. And if they don't go away, just delete all your accounts and start again. General MGD 109 (talk) 18:06, September 6, 2014 (UTC)
I have no power to stop them, cause there not going to stop if you make an article for them. There love it, these sorts of people thrive off attention. The best effect its going to have is cause the trolls to return to the wiki and cause more messes for me to clear up. I get it, you feel down troden and want retribution.
Now you don't have to delete your work, just don't let them see it. Don't reply when they criticise you. If you see a message from them, don't read it. Just delete it, you don't have to listen to them. General MGD 109 (talk) 21:39, September 6, 2014 (UTC)
Okay, I'll raise it with fellow Admins tomorrow.
I have to know, how did all this start? And I know you don't want to hear this but it looks you are going to have to delete all your work and start again. If not, there never going to leave you alone. Perhaps you should get your own website, or do physical art rather than online art. General MGD 109 (talk) 23:16, September 6, 2014 (UTC)
I hate to break it you, but we don't live in a fair world. Sometimes we have to except a blow to the head, if it mean there are no further nudges. Like I said, I'll raise it with the other Admins tomorrow. But as for you, I have a feeling unless you change your tactics your problems aren't going anywhere. Have you tried professional help? General MGD 109 (talk) 23:38, September 6, 2014 (UTC)
I've said several times now I'll raise it. Yes I was perfectly happy, I was perfectly happy to carry on even with all the problems going on. I only stopped being perfectly happy cause the credibilty of the claims you were making was seriously called into question. And then afterwards the only way to stop all these problems was to stop them from existing. And kindly let it go, he is not a troll, has never been a troll and isn't targetting you. He just doesn't like you, cause several comments you made offended him.
Its not an excuse, its a fact. In real life, things aren't fair and good people suffer for no reason. And sometimes you just have to cut your losses and move on. General MGD 109 (talk) 11:33, September 7, 2014 (UTC)
You have given me nothing more than circumstantual, which has already been disporven. He is not a troll, I know how it is, your trying to find a way to explain you being baned. And you've got a guy who admits to not liking you, who encouraged your ban. Thus in your mind that makes him a troll, and if you can prove it then you will of course be forgiven and let back, then you can make these articles you desiere. I hate to break it to you, but it doesn't work that way. And finding a scapegoat isn't going to help.
Lets just cut this, okay. I'm not justifying it, I was just trying to nicely say that your probably going to have to give up if you want to get out of this. Cause really there never going to leave you alone, nothing you and I can say will do anything. Now I'm once again looking into this matter, as you requested, and I'll let you know the results.
I see, well thanks for making that clear. Any way after a talk with my fellow Admins, we have reached an agreement, one which I think will please you. We have decided to recreate the page for Willow, in fact I will personally do so. But only if you can provide us with outright concrete evidence of all your claims. Once that is done, the page will be restored, but until then it will not be. I'm sorry if this seems a bit strict, but it comes down to these being serious claims, a bit to serious for simply word of mouth, not that I'm calling you a liar or anything, its just my other admins want proof before they will allow such a page. I'm sure this agreement will please everybody.
I hope you don't take this the wrong way, but I'm a bit unwilling to just give out my email. Is there something else we can try first? I don't have any social media accounts either.General MGD 109 (talk) 22:44, September 7, 2014 (UTC)
I know, but they would reveal several of my personal details to you, and its not a I don't trust you, but one can never be to careful, as you rightly know. So I would prefer it if we explored all other lines of enquiry first. General MGD 109 (talk) 23:13, September 7, 2014 (UTC)
Oh sorry Reson, been a bit busy recently, and while I have had several discusions with Robinsonbecky over the last few days and they was very willing to persue it on my behalf, so far they haven't raised anything to my attention, I will case them about that later to day. But they've probably just been a bit to busy. Still I'm making sure the matter is being thoroughly investigated, as this will be a final decission, it is important that there are no mistakes. The matters in safe hands don't you worry. General MGD 109 (talk) 17:31, September 10, 2014 (UTC)
I sorry but I can't give you to many definates at the moment I'm afraid, everything is still soley in the examinon stage. Well I did speak to Becky but no real advancements have occured. They said so far they haven't found anything outstanding. But also said they haven't gotten very far due to being busy with other maters. There going to contact me when they have more to report. As such I can't be certain when the page will be created (assuming it passes the specifications set) a couple of weeks perhaps.
As for your editing it, I'm afraid that most likely will not be possible as you are presently still banned from the wiki, sorry about that, that matters really out of my hands. As for a second page, that is also possible, but it will require more evidence from you I'm afraid. General MGD 109 (talk) 23:36, September 10, 2014 (UTC)
As I have not actually seen your evidence I can't comment on its blantancy or obviousness. And it must go through an indepth checked to make certain it fits the specifications to warrant a page, and then (and only then) following a unanimous agreement of all the admins, the page will be restored. As following the Wiki's rules. That is the only way that a page of this kind will be created. So far Becky hasn't mentioned much fitting the more external qualifications and claims it is mostly very standard and low key (which I'm afraid is not very good for you). But I would like to repeat they haven't gotten very far yet.
We have been over this Reson, you were not banned due to some cyberbully conspiricsy, you were banned because to many of the accusations leveled against you turned out to be true and you could not answer all the accusations raised against you. I'm sorry I really am, but I can't choice when to enforce the rules and when not to. General MGD 109 (talk) 15:42, September 11, 2014 (UTC)
Reson, if your going to comment on here still, kindly don't delete other peoples comments. And even if she is, she's not doing anything wrong, so no real problem. I can't just ban her cause you said so.
Deleting other user's comments Edit
Thank you. Now, as for the people you would like me to ban. I still need evidence of the cyber-bullying, and can't find anything of the sort on your talk page. Please direct me to a specific place where this is occurring. EmpyreanSmoke (talk) 01:23, October 2, 2014 (UTC)
Yeah, as far as I can see, there's nothing to suggest cyber-bullying. This thing between you two is starting to seriously aggravate me. Just stop tormenting her and leave her alone! -- ImperiexSeed, 8:50 AM, October 2nd 2014
Then, still, please stop entangling and coiling yourself further by engaging and stop talking to her. -- ImperiexSeed, 11:08 AM, October 2nd 2014
I'm sorry, but I am not going to search through your talk page history to try to find cyberbulling that may or may not exist. Either direct me to a SPECIFIC spot where there has been some, and I will deal with it. Other than that, I am not going on a scavenger hunt. EmpyreanSmoke (talk) 00:17, October 3, 2014 (UTC)
Okay, this needs to be settled, once and for all. Woud you kindly meet me on Chat, on the Real Life Villains wiki, I already know you can. Let me know when your available. General MGD 109 (talk) 20:02, October 21, 2014 (UTC)
Taken care of Edit
Hey ResonX, I took care of that troller you told me about. I blocked him for a week, so he should learn his lesson. As you probably know, this wiki doesn't have many admins (I am the only active one). I am requesting to become a bureaucrat, and in order to do so, I need an on wiki vote. I created a blog to see who wants, or doesn't want me to be a bureaucrat. Please take a look at the blog and vote me to become a bureaucrat so I can add more trustworthy, helpful admins. EmpyreanSmoke (talk) 18:08, November 16, 2014 (UTC)
Edits and Undoing Edits on Talk pages Edit
If you could please explain what is going on with the constant editing and undoing of edits among you and a few users like Imperiex's and Empyrean's talk page, that would be much appreciated. FTWinchester (talk) 22:05, December 23, 2014 (UTC)