Supernatural Wiki
Supernatural Wiki


Hi, welcome to Supernatural Wiki! Thanks for your edit to the Man's Best Friend With Benefits page.

Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! -- ImperiexSeed (Talk) 07:57, February 21, 2013

Your story...[]

Ok....I'm gonna need to know when you want it to take place, what Gods/Goddesses you want in it and if you want Garth as the main character?Self-Declared God of Supreme Conduits (talk) 12:08, April 7, 2013 (UTC)Kesslerbeast

I'm on chat now if you aren't busySelf-Declared God of Supreme Conduits (talk) 16:18, April 7, 2013 (UTC)KB

Right. Thanks for informing me. I'll undo those edits now. FTWinchester (talk) 05:32, May 20, 2013 (UTC)

Re:New admins[]

Hi, real life calls so I can't reply fully right now, though I would very much like to. Just to let you know that I've seen your message, but I won't be able to reply for the next 4 days, so you will have to wait till then. Calebchiam Talk 15:07, June 2, 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, I've been pretty busy for the past 2 weeks (only regained internet access last week) but that's no excuse for leaving a message unanswered that long, so for that, my sincere apologies.
Alright first of all, on principle, I won't consider giving adminship to the users you mentioned unless they consent to the request themselves (i.e. accept your nomination or request it from me directly). Whether or not I would give it to them if they did consent is another matter which I'll address if they ever do request it.
So for your case, I'll just consider the basic criteria as per usual. I see sustained editing since March, so that shows commitment, great. Good amount of edits, and reasonably proficient in editing. That being said, you haven't been in any conflicts with other users (which is a good thing) but I am not sure what level of judgment you would display in such situations. As a sysop, you'll be required to settle disputes in a neutral fashion, so your level of judgment is the most important criteria.
So here's a not-so-hypothetical scenario: One user berates another for supposedly targeting and revising his edits specifically. Address 2 scenarios: (1) The 2nd user isn't following the 1st user's edits and is merely making changes to whatever he sees fit. (2) The 2nd user is following the 1st user's edits. The assumption in both cases is that the edits made by the 2nd user are useful revisions that improve the Wiki. How would you resolve this conflict?
There's no one right answer, so don't be too flustered about it, I just want to see how rational your judgment is and how you think. Cheers. Calebchiam Talk 00:47, June 17, 2013 (UTC)
Fair enough. Although for the 1st scenario, instead of referencing the idea that the ends justify the means (which is not always a good moral reference for action), you could just remind the user that the whole idea of a Wiki is predicated on a belief in collaborative editing, etc. In any case, yeah, your judgment seems quite alright. Please familiarise yourself with the policies (there are more, but I haven't gotten around to adding them) and this guide article to know what is expected of you. When you've read them and agree to abide by them in your admin duties, message me again and I'll sysop you. Thanks. Calebchiam Talk 03:14, June 18, 2013 (UTC)

Don't worry about it[]

Don't worry about it, we all make mistakes. Although to be honest I recomend in future you try basing points on topics your unsure about on more realiable sources. General MGD 109 (talk) 22:28, June 2, 2013 (UTC)


I apologize for leaving chat so soon. There was a storm here and it knocked my wifi out He Who Shall Not Be Named By Mortals (talk) 14:23, June 15, 2013 (UTC) Kesslerbeast


Congratulations! You can now do the following:

  • Edit and move fully protected pages
  • Delete, restore, and view deleted revisions of pages and images
  • Protect pages from edits, moves, or creation by non-sysops
  • Block and unblock users and IP addresses and ranges
  • Edit the interface pages in the MediaWiki: namespace
  • View Special:Unwatchedpages

If you have any questions, feel free to ask. Calebchiam Talk 05:30, June 18, 2013 (UTC)

Hi Raghav. I would like to ask how can I become an adminstrator, because I am interested. Thank you.Epakrios (talk) 16:22, March 23, 2014 (UTC)


Thanks for adding the photos! Also, congrats on your adminship. FTWinchester (talk) 02:35, June 19, 2013 (UTC)

No worries. FTWinchester (talk) 05:45, June 19, 2013 (UTC)


Just thought I would congratulate you on becoming an Admin, congratulations I'm sure your do a lot of good for this wiki. General MGD 109 (talk) 18:51, June 20, 2013 (UTC)

Likewise, congratulations Admin RaghavD.[[User:Twilight Despair 5|]] ([[The God of Creation]]) (talk) 21:10, June 20, 2013 (UTC)

I, too, would like to give my congradulations, RaghavD. I am glad we finally have an Admin who believes in neutrality on the wiki like myself. 23:36, June 20, 2013 (UTC)

It's no problem, if you need any help on pages let me know. And so you don't have to type my entire user name, I reply to anything like Td5, Td, Twi, Twilight, etc.[[User:Twilight Despair 5|]] ([[The God of Creation]]) (talk) 17:32, June 21, 2013 (UTC)

I don't see any problems with adding one, in all but one sense. How would the countdown go, exactly? As there are more than one time zone, I would say if there would be one, it would be a countdown, in terms of days. As this way, an exact hour and minutes countdown, would only directly play towards one time-zone, which would be a bit, bias.[[User:Twilight Despair 5|]] ([[The God of Creation]]) (talk) 17:41, June 21, 2013 (UTC)

What, I mean is that, in the US alone there are four time zones. But, that is a minor problem at best. But, I am not an admin only the Chat Moderator, so I don't know how much say I have on this, as iit is something that is outside making an article on the wikia.[[User:Twilight Despair 5|]] ([[The God of Creation]]) (talk) 17:58, June 21, 2013 (UTC)


Hey, I'm a new user. Just wondering is this image perfect for the infobox picture of the Lilith article?


Superman-Logo-Signature-QaYYum.png ~TomWelling~ Superman-Logo-Signature-QaYYum.png 15:53, June 21, 2013 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for telling me! :) Yes, I agree now Gurgatory (talk) 00:29, June 27, 2013 (UTC)


Sure. As much as I can. What about it? FTWinchester (talk) 13:00, June 28, 2013 (UTC)

I'm no expert, but I believe it can be changed to match the background of the wiki. First you have to edit the infobox template in source mode (it's usually automatically on source mode), and most templates have a "style" portion. It's followed by six-character codes that stand in as color codes (i.e. #111111), or in some cases, you could use key words if the wiki/code recognizes it. All the elements have to be individually modified (i.e., the border, the space, the text), which gives you flexibility in designing the template. A quick google search can get you a list of essential/commonly-used color palette. As for the breaks, I'm trying to find out why there are breaks. Give me a few to test it out (I'm working as an anon on the wiki as I post this). FTWinchester (talk) 03:56, June 29, 2013 (UTC)

So I've modified the template a bit, with much help from other templates from other wikias. I can't affix the image limit without messing up the whole template (I'm really stumped about it, so I just removed the imagewidth limit altogether, which appears to work fine). As for the color of the text, I've tried to approximate the colors of the wiki, but you could change them. Here's one of the many hex code references you could use. In the first line of the code, you have the "background-color" -- which I've currently set to violet, on the third line, you have another "background-color", which I've set to red, and finally, the "color" immediately after it I've set to yellow.

For the breaks, instead of trying to find out what creates the break, I've just tried a different approach, which allows you to just input the data, without having to name every title/field (i.e., without having to type 'Ex Partner', and then the name of the Ex Partner on the next field). The disadvantage of what I've done is it would be incomplete if you need more fields. This could be easily remedied by simply editing the template source code to include additional fields you may need. Simply copy the part starting with:

|- style="vertical=align:top;"

all the way down to (except change the parantheses into brackets; I only changed them into parantheses because they would be read as source codes and thus would not be displayed for you to read here in the talk page):

((field placeholder))

and supply the necessary field title. For example, I've added the field 'Known Relatives', which did not exist in the previous form of the template. Say for example you wanted to add the field 'Alias', the new code you'll have to add would look like this:

|- style="vertical-align: top;"
((#if: (((Alias|))) | ((!)) valign=top ((!)) "'Alias"' ((!!)) (((Alias))) ))

There, I hope it helps. FTWinchester (talk) 04:59, June 29, 2013 (UTC)

Let me check if I can trim it down. FTWinchester (talk) 05:05, June 29, 2013 (UTC)

I've trimmed it. Just adjust it accordingly. It's in the second line (technically a continuation of the first line section on "style"), with the data of "width". Just adjust the number to your liking. FTWinchester (talk) 05:08, June 29, 2013 (UTC)

No problem. I hope it's nothing I can't fix. FTWinchester (talk) 05:17, June 29, 2013 (UTC)

re: Eve[]

I though they were included already? Or did you mean the wiki's main page? FTWinchester (talk) 13:11, July 3, 2013 (UTC)

Personally, I think his status as a deity needs a qualifier, as he is, technically, an archangel. Whereas all other beings in the Deities tab were legit deities. I mean I have no problem with you adding Lucifer, so long as there's a way for readers/visitors to know that Lucifer was actually only an archangel and was only considered a god by most demons. FTWinchester (talk) 13:16, July 3, 2013 (UTC)

I've modified Lucifer's overview info so it's clear that he was being deified. That should clear my reservations. I'm just not sure if other contributors would agree to having him on the 'Deities' tab. But for me, I've no problem about it (since I've already made it clear on his page as to why he was being considered a deity). FTWinchester (talk) 13:19, July 3, 2013 (UTC)

Now that we're on the topic, I was thinking if you could add the tie-in novels in the 'Browse' section on the main page, along with the 'TV series', 'Comic series', and 'Anime series'. FTWinchester (talk) 13:29, July 3, 2013 (UTC)
Thanks. About the slider, I'm not really sure. I've been meaning to study how it works but it's an admin-access only. In any case, I think you've already edited it? FTWinchester (talk) 12:26, July 4, 2013 (UTC)
The regular templates, anyone can edit--that I'm sure, as I have created the info banner templates we are using right now. However, I couldn't seem (or never gave much time) to access the slider in the homepage, because whenever I try to edit the homepage template, I can't see any codes/text/links or what not save for some two alignment codes. I got nothing, so I really don't know how I can help. Sorry, man. FTWinchester (talk) 18:04, July 4, 2013 (UTC)


Sure. I'll keep an eye out for present-tense. And thank you ! :) {{SUBST:User:InSaiyan/SigTemplate}} 11:42, July 6, 2013 (UTC)

Re:Countdown Clock[]

Sure, I've done this before.... I'll see what I can do. Superman-Logo-Signature-QaYYum.png ~TomWelling~ Superman-Logo-Signature-QaYYum.png 10:12, July 7, 2013 (UTC)

Done. Is it okay? Superman-Logo-Signature-QaYYum.png ~TomWelling~ Superman-Logo-Signature-QaYYum.png 10:12, July 7, 2013 (UTC)

Just dropping by to say that the Slider text description is behind the sliding tabs/links. FTWinchester (talk) 15:10, July 7, 2013 (UTC)

Awesome, thanks. FTWinchester (talk) 12:41, July 8, 2013 (UTC)

I'm glad you'd like it. If you need any help, I'm here! :D Superman-Logo-Signature-QaYYum.png ~TomWelling~ Superman-Logo-Signature-QaYYum.png 14:05, July 12, 2013 (UTC)


Hey, I've seen the Dragon article on the main page for a long time... Don't you wanna change it? Superman-Logo-Signature-QaYYum.png ~TomWelling~ Superman-Logo-Signature-QaYYum.png 14:11, July 12, 2013 (UTC)

Re: New Pages[]

Well for rituals and spells, there's fleshing out of the 66 seals, with special focus on the Rising of the Witnesses, Raising of Samhain. There's also summoning Zeus, binding reapers--those sort of stuff, plus those listed on the page 'Ritual'. I can't even list everything right now because that would mean going through all the rituals since season 1. We need as many active users as possible. Thanks, man. FTWinchester (talk) 05:55, July 16, 2013 (UTC)

Yeah that's also one of my problems because he was so far the only pagan deity ever summoned. Although on the other hand, I don't think I'm in favor of letting the 'Ritual' page continue. After all, that would mean we'd be cramming everything in there. Also, clustering and categorizing them would need some consensus. The demon summoning was easy, because they all summoned demons, and angel summoning was logical because it was a counterpart to the demon summoning. However, I suppose a page on summoning Zeus could stand on its own. Once we start fleshing out those pages on other rituals (especially summoning rituals) it won't look so weird. Besides, Caleb agreed everything is worthy of documentation. If you're still in doubt, take a look at these pages 1 and 2. If those two objects warrant pages on their own, then I believe rituals (which served more purpose in terms of lore and plot development) have all the more reason to have their own pages. FTWinchester (talk) 06:09, July 16, 2013 (UTC)

Also, technically, to be fair, the page about the Spear of Destiny I created would also fall among those pages/objects I cited, for apparent lack of purpose in the show. However, in my defense, the artifact did hold real-world lore reflections and thus, would have had some significance/relevance to the show. FTWinchester (talk) 06:11, July 16, 2013 (UTC)

By the way, it's also awesome of you to expand on the animated series pages. I've been waiting forever for a contributor who gave time for that. If I only had a copy then I might have. Anyway, back on topic, this is what I had in mind when I opened up the discussion on improving our pages on Rituals and spells. FTWinchester (talk) 06:14, July 16, 2013 (UTC)

Exactly! Don't you just get all excited when you browse a wiki and see tons of lore under just one category? That's why I was gunning for us to improve our categorizations. And I know we could do something similar, if not better, because both shows were about good guys hunting/slaying demons and vampires and stuff. Also, thank you for correcting me. I've only read about two or three tie-in books, so I may have missed several others. I think your idea is a good one. Could I just add that we use the 'MixedCanon' template before the section of Hel starts? FTWinchester (talk) 06:28, July 16, 2013 (UTC)

Uhh, yeha. Sorry if I confused you. I just meant I used the buffyverse wikia's categorization as an inspiration because both shows were similar. Everything else after that was about Hel in the summoning page. FTWinchester (talk) 13:22, July 16, 2013 (UTC)

I also just realized Veritas was another pagan deity that was summoned. FTWinchester (talk) 04:16, July 18, 2013 (UTC)


If in case you are locking the page, please don't forget to temporarily add the template Locked on the page. Thanks. FTWinchester (talk) 12:35, July 22, 2013 (UTC)


Hi Raghav! These categories are superfluous, very very very superfluous. They aren't 'categorising' anything at all, especially since there are more directed categories (i.e: Season 1 episodes, etc), that's why I think they need to go. Powerhouse wikis like Survivor Wiki and Merlin Wiki have got rid of them because of this, and I think the same should happen here. #DownWithTheNonsenseCategories :P Superman-Logo-Signature-QaYYum.png ~TomWelling~ Superman-Logo-Signature-QaYYum.png 14:30, August 3, 2013 (UTC)

If you say it should be discussed among the community (perhaps w/ a poll as well, to yield the true consensus), I wouldn't stop you. Just that I've worked with some of the highest qualified users around Wikia and they would agree with me. P.S, please meet me on chat if you can. :) Superman-Logo-Signature-QaYYum.png ~TomWelling~ Superman-Logo-Signature-QaYYum.png 14:37, August 3, 2013 (UTC)

I see[]

Oh okay, gotcha

I see[]

Oh okay, gotcha. Master of matter 16:57, August 5, 2013 (UTC).

Talk page[]

Yeah, about that. I know I tried to keep my post as objective as possible, but given the history of interaction with a certain contributor and his/her style of conversing, I'd rather leave it as is, than to risk another flame war. I'm seriously tired of those kinds of conversations here in the wiki, and I hate holding grudges. It's not worth it--especially in something like a wikia. I like going here to contirbute, but I have more to life than this. I don't want to get so upset over something like this. Thanks for asking, though. FTWinchester (talk) 06:00, August 7, 2013 (UTC)


I'm not the final authority on stuff that goes on in the Wiki, so this is really up for discussion. But IMO, merchandise is fine. Novels should come with plot synopses and all; it's part of canon. DVDs are alright too, though we should probably group them all under one article. Cheers. Calebchiam Talk 14:56, August 21, 2013 (UTC)

i love supernatural. Castiel and Dean are my favorite people on the show. i think dean is gonna be surprise when he finds out that his friend castiel is no longer an angel. now he can be a hunter with sam and dean now.Nicole Janine Holbrook (talk) 23:05, August 30, 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the warm welcome. I will be glad editing the page. Thank you. Viri cristal (talk) 00:17, September 2, 2013 (UTC)

Serin 15 (talk) 16:48, September 5, 2013 (UTC)glad to meet you here

  • Same here!  :) RaghavD Heck yes, I'm so ODD!! 16:58, September 5, 2013 (UTC)


Very funny, I like the statement. Real talk.

Serin 15 (talk) 02:17, September 6, 2013 (UTC)an admin?that's cool.have you  watched all seasons?


Hey there! I'm not that active on this Wiki, but this user: has been sending me disturbing and creepy messages on here because he trolled my main wiki and I really don't want this Wiki to suffer because of this crap too. Can you please ban him? Thank you! TOP (talk) 03:20, September 15, 2013 (UTC)

I also posted a general message to the community about this user a few minutes ago. Please review the case and see if you could find a way to prevent this. FTWinchester (talk) 04:12, September 15, 2013 (UTC)

Thank you so much! He's been doing this to other users on my main wiki as well. Our admins have been trying to get ahold of staff. But yeah, thank you so much for the help! TOP (talk) 14:30, September 15, 2013 (UTC)

Re: New Spell[]

Sorry I posted my first reply on my own wall. How dumb. Sorry, I don't have the time right now. And that page is your brainchild, go do the honors. I'm still stumped with ideas but I'll message you as soon as I come up with something. FTWinchester (talk) 13:49, September 15, 2013 (UTC)


Hello! Glad to hear that you created the parent filter, but, when you said you created a template, do you mean you edited the MediaWiki page? The program launch means a MediaWiki:ParentFilter page was created on every wiki for users to fill out. To link people to that page, I would just add a link or button on the main page and/or nav bar! Please let me know if this answers your questions or not :) Grace (profile)•(talk) 17:04, September 18, 2013 (UTC)

The format looks good! It should be on this page though. You can just copy and paste, and then fill it out with the proper information. Grace (profile)•(talk) 17:12, September 18, 2013 (UTC)

No worries! I double checked for you and that is accurate :) I just went ahead and removed video games and film for you, so now you just have the TV template to fill out. Hope that helps! Grace (profile)•(talk) 17:27, September 18, 2013 (UTC)

Sorry about that! It seems that you might have actually been doing it right the first time, lol. The MediaWiki page is, in fact, directions for creating a parent filter page (as in article page). You should create a Parent Filter Template and then copy and paste the code from here onto that template. Once that is done, what would be best is creating a page called Supernatural Wiki: Parent Filter OR you can put it on the MediaWiki page like they did here. To answer your last question, availability should be where this show is available. In Adventure Time's case, they put Cartoon Network, iTunes, etc. Hope that all makes sense! Grace (profile)•(talk) 17:43, September 18, 2013 (UTC)

Ok, great! Thanks for bearing with the confusion :D Page looks great! Grace (profile)•(talk) 17:51, September 18, 2013 (UTC)

Unfortunately, that tab is uneditable (unless through a CSS hack or something)! Aside from the nav bar, the only thing I can recommend would be to put a button or something on the main page to make it more visible. This could be just a text link somewhere or an image button people can click on to get to the parent filter, whichever you prefer! Grace (profile)•(talk) 18:02, September 18, 2013 (UTC)


The category includes angels with (i) immense power, (ii) special role and/or (iii) high rank (political/organizational power, not innate ability). The conditions are and/or. Virgil is a "Weapons Keeper of Heaven" and described as the "nastiest" angel under the command of Raphael--indicating at least two of the conditions applying to him (or even all three, arguably). Ion, Nathaniel and Esper, I also had doubts at first, but, this is Ion's line about their group: "You soldiers, down in the garrison, at least they let you believe the lie. Upstairs, working for Naomi, working in intelligence, we had no option but to live in the dirt. She never reset me completely." They were in the intelligence division, and described as "upstairs", also the term frequently used to connote higher angels who knew of Heaven's plans to let the Apocalypse continue. The line of Ion clearly connotes the soldiers or 'grunts' are below the rank of the intelligence division. Angels working in the intelligence division are not (i) immensely powerful, but they do satisfy (ii) specialized roles and (iii) high rank. Not as high as the archangels, but obviously higher than even garrison leaders. But I'm open to discussion. FTWinchester (talk) 17:54, September 21, 2013 (UTC)

General already convinced me to remove the Intelligence Angels, save from Naomi. I hope that is okay for you. Thanks. FTWinchester (talk) 05:34, September 22, 2013 (UTC)


i jz wnna knw if it is possible to post quizzes and our own stories...........

hridzHridhya (talk) 04:07, September 23, 2013 (UTC)

Re:Magic Practitioners[]

If you think it's better to list everything under the category, we could discuss it. That was just my opinion. I don't represent the whole wiki. Just tell me if you feel like the otherwise is better. FTWinchester (talk) 04:36, September 24, 2013 (UTC)


Sorry. It's because the other model can not leave any blank lines.

What is the appropriate color? David Kaique (talk) 12:16, September 25, 2013 (UTC)

Okay, but what part of the template? David Kaique (talk) 12:40, September 25, 2013 (UTC)
As the articles there is a section "Appearances", i do not think it is necessary put the characters appearances in the template.
Since there is already a section gets repetitive. David Kaique (talk) 14:54, September 25, 2013 (UTC)
I didn't realize it was sysop only. Yeah, something like that. As well as "Micheal Swrod" for Dean, "Big Daddy Reaper" for Death, "Scribe of God" for Metatron, etc. Stuff like those. FTWinchester (talk) 16:28, September 25, 2013 (UTC)
Thanks. FTWinchester (talk) 16:30, September 25, 2013 (UTC)
Yes.David Kaique (talk) 11:40, September 29, 2013 (UTC)

what do you think is gonna happened when dean finds out that his friend castiel is no longer a angel.

Nicole Janine Holbrook (talk) 23:32, October 8, 2013 (UTC)


I was just wondering if you could help me do a character box on my profile page, like you have on yours? It'd be much appreciated. Seems like they are different from the ones on the TVD and Charmed Wiki sites.

Malkie Skye (talk) 08:32, October 9, 2013 (UTC)

Title Card[]

Hey, I was just wondering if we could use a larger version of the title card (that covers the whole page) as the background and maybe modify its opacity like from last season? FTWinchester (talk) 13:53, October 9, 2013 (UTC)

Sorry to inconvenience you. FTWinchester (talk) 14:07, October 9, 2013 (UTC)

Sorry. It's just that my OCD is kicking in, and I remember that at least for the past two seasons, the background was stretched and not tiled. FTWinchester (talk) 16:39, October 9, 2013 (UTC)

yeah i think that Dean is gonna be pissed of course and make sure that Castiel gets turn back into a angel but we just have to wait and see of course.Nicole Janine Holbrook (talk) 19:00, October 9, 2013 (UTC)

I WAS WONDERING WHAT IS THE SPN SEASON 9 TITLE CARD SUPPOSE TO BE OFNicole Janine Holbrook (talk) 19:07, October 9, 2013 (UTC)

Is there a template I am supposed to be using for it though? So that it looks like that?

Malkie Skye (talk) 00:30, October 10, 2013 (UTC)

Title Card[]

I'm not sure. I was asking the same question. I don't know if we should base it on the charred wings or the pale yellow-brownish smoke. FTWinchester (talk) 02:49, October 11, 2013 (UTC)

How about this? Hexcode is EDE1AF. FTWinchester (talk) 02:50, October 11, 2013 (UTC)

It looks alright. But let's just wait if somebody else complains? For the meantime, I'll start changing the banner templates. FTWinchester (talk) 12:53, October 11, 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. I got it as good as I can get it. Seems it doesn't want me adding anything that's not on the little green thingy lol

Malkie Skye (talk) 22:26, October 11, 2013 (UTC)

Do you know the hexcode of the new hyperlink color? The silentpoethosea isn't responding to my question. Thanks. FTWinchester (talk) 12:33, October 16, 2013 (UTC)

Okay, thanks. FTWinchester (talk) 12:37, October 16, 2013 (UTC)

Spotight Request[]

Hi. Supernatural Wiki is in good shape except that the main page protection would need to be lowered again for the spotlight. It can be raised again if there are problems.
In terms of the timing... spotlights only go up at the beginning and middle of the month, so there was no way we could have put it up by the 8th when it was requested on the 1st; however if you still wish to be spotlighted, please fix the main page and let me know on my talk page. -- Wendy (talk) 04:01, October 16, 2013 (UTC)
Hi. I've added the wiki to the approved spotlight list. I will pass along your picture and caption; they generally do use them but they sometimes just re-activate an old one instead, so I cannot promise they will not just re-run the current one. Hopefully that is ok also! The current one was not a result of the request but a choice by our Community Devlopment team (most of the spotlights are chosen by them in fact). -- Wendy (talk) 01:23, October 18, 2013 (UTC)

Chuck Shurley[]

Hi im Jack davenport and i edited th epage god added a picture of Chuck shurley beacuse he is god.Why dod you remove it.

I hope Dean and Sam find Castiel before the angels do of course. Next week episode is gonna awesome i cant wait.Nicole Janine Holbrook (talk) 23:51, October 17, 2013 (UTC)

I cant wait to see Castiel in tonight episode of SPN.Nicole Janine Holbrook (talk) 23:54, October 22, 2013 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for welcoming me so nicely.

The thing about Ezekiel's wings was noticec by a friend of mine and myself during a discussion about Zeke and we both were like "OMGUBH This could actually be a hint for something like the Zeke-Is-Lucie-Theory" so I just thought uploading this here wouldn't be such a bad idea.

Right now I haven't got any questions, but if I've got some, I will directly come to you. :)

Hanajima (talk) 14:59, October 23, 2013 (UTC)Hanajima


Hells yes!, i lmao when sam lit up, but the demonic soilders, they were just like, what the hell.  epic of matter 15:46, October 23, 2013 (UTC) Master of matter 15:46, October 23, 2013 (UTC)

You think it does look like Metatron? Didn't think about that aspect, I only focused on Lucie behind this, 'cause, you know, that rumours about him coming back are spread everywhere, but I think you really could be right, Metatron would be capable to do somethin' like this aswell.

Nah, meeting someone trustworthy definitly isn't an easy challenge. To don't say an impossible one. 'Cause everyone they could trust is... dead. Hope some of them will come back. But I'm already happy that the family can trust each other when it really does matter. :)

Hanajima (talk) 16:12, October 23, 2013 (UTC)Hanajima

Don't misunderstand me, I didn't say that they don't make mistakes and that they surely have to apologize sometimes for the things they did, but they're only wanting the best for their family.

And do you really think they will "hate" each other? Hate is a pretty strong word and yeah, I'm sure, Sam will be REALLY pissed of when he gets to know about Zeke, but he won't hate Dean. He could not. Same with Cas. No matter how Dean will explain this to him or what else he will say, Cas will presumably be very sad and he probably won't unterstand Dean, but I don't think he will get angry, that just doesn't sound like Cas. And hate Dean? Not possible.

Oh, come on, isn't it kinda sweet? And, yeah, I totally agree with you, they're indeed using it quite often, but what would you do if a beloved person does wrong things, but has got the right reason? Would you really just say "No, you made a mistake, I don't want to see you again, bye"? I don't think so. :3

Hanajima (talk) 16:58, October 23, 2013 (UTC)Hanajima

It really does. Charlie is just so awesome and I'm so exited to see what's going to happen between our dear little demonic captive and the wicked witch. I mean, Crowley indeed seems to like her (well, the Crowley-way of liking someone) and I could imagine that they will kinda work together. 'Cause I don't think that Crowley remains in the bunker the whole season, I mean, it's Crowley. And I also read somewhere that an enemy they've got in common, I suppose Abaddon, will lead the Winchesters and Crowley to a temporarily the-enemy-of-my-enemy-is-my-friend-situation!

Hanajima (talk) 17:36, October 23, 2013 (UTC) Hanajima

Yeah, I know, but I really love it when Crowley is on the side of the good guys. And as the thing with Bobby showed us, he is able to be a nice guy aswell. Something original? I think it's on of the best parts of SPN that anything can happen, although it did happen before. Like when dead characters are appearing again or under the right circumstances an enemy can become an ally. Meg is the best example for that ally aspect and I'm hoping so extremly much that she will appear again. :>

Hanajima (talk) 18:06, October 23, 2013 (UTC) Hanajima

Replacing her is impossible in my oppinion. I'm really loving Meg and also Megstiel, so my biggest hope is that they will bring her back for at least one episode. But I agree with you, I would also like to see a new cool ally and I think we probably get to see the one or another in the upcoming episodes.

Hanajima (talk) 19:09, October 24, 2013 (UTC)Hanajima

yeah i enjoyed it. im kinda of upset that Dean told Castiel that he couldnt stay. Cas was so upset.

No problem, no problem. Exactly! It's quite presumably that there won't be many other seasons, so it really would be difficult to introduce someone new having the potential to develop. And that's one of the reasons why I want so many characters to come back. I mean, half of my favourite characters are dead, so I'm really hoping they'll bring the one or another character back to life.

Hanajima (talk) 18:17, October 31, 2013 (UTC)Hanajima

Yeah, I'm one of the people wanting Gabe back, he's just... awesome. Why don't you like Richard Speight Jr.? I think he did a really good job and played the character quite fitting. :O

But besides Gabe I want to see Meg and Balthy again. Naomi would also be cool, but I can't think of a way how to put her in again, so I would be extremly happy to see a flashback between her and Crowley.

Hanajima (talk) 21:30, November 1, 2013 (UTC)Hanajima

Well, I would say each to his own. Some people like him others don't. :3

I really don't know why, but since Goodbye Stranger they're among my favourite pairings. I laughed so hard because of the scene in Taxi Driver in which Crowley calls her bureaucrat and she tries to kill him.

Hanajima (talk) 12:55, November 3, 2013 (UTC)Hanajima

Yeah, I hope that as well. I always thought of them as "Narowley" or something like that, but I like your version better. Naoley sounds sweet and quite fitting! Btw, how do you think did it came to their... I'm just gonna call it affair?

Hanajima (talk) 15:58, November 3, 2013 (UTC)Hanajima

Hm, I thought about that for a while and I could imagine that a group of crossroad demons messed with the contracts they had made, for exaple they included not only the person having made the deal but the whole family of that person, so they would also come to hell. Crowley, having been the King of Crossroads, wanted to stop them but they had fled. And Naomi was send by... I don't know, probably Michael to stop the culprits and to bring the souls to heaven. So the two of them met each other and somehow had to work together and it ended with them having an affair. ...Just an idea. XD

Hanajima (talk) 19:23, November 3, 2013 (UTC)Hanajima


I appreciate it. Tswana (talk) 09:32, November 6, 2013 (UTC)

Template:D deletion[]

Why was the 'Template:D' deleted? That was the template we were using for speedy deletion. Without that template page, the Speedy deletion category won't function properly (as seen in Spring Heeled Jack). FTWinchester (talk) 00:48, November 8, 2013 (UTC)

Mistakes tend to happen to everyone. Thanks for restoring the page. FTWinchester (talk) 12:11, November 8, 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, as I said it was just an idea, nothing special. :)

Hanajima (talk) 00:58, November 10, 2013 (UTC)Hanajima

Reaper Possession[]

Hey, thanks for messaging me. I do need a bit of help, in regards to articles dealing with reapers and possession. It is speculation that a reaper can possess. There is no clear evidence that they do since a rouge reaper does human activities (whether it is by choice or not is unknown). I think I explained my point to the best of my ability in the April Kelly talk page. Please have a look at it.

Back in Black[]

Hello! I recently created a page called "Black in Black," but it should have been "Back in Black". I made a typo and I cannot rename it, because someone already created a new page. Could you delete it please? The link is above. ↑ Thank you!  ♥ maris ♥ we're going to heaven, clarence. 00:32, November 26, 2013 (UTC)

A Quick Question[]

Hi! I just wanted to ask if you're okay with some grammar/tense edits being made? I'm not sure what the protocol is here, but I noticed some things that could use a bit of editing on the pages I was looking at. However, this isn't my wiki (and I have no idea if you have a specific community of people who are allowed to edit), so I thought I'd better ask. I did make one edit already--added a comma and capitalized a pronoun used for God (standard practice in English)--but feel free to get rid of it or ask me not to make any others if that's how this wiki works. Thanks for having such extensive information on SPN, though, it's proving very useful.

DawnFire (talk) 03:35, November 27, 2013 (UTC)

By the way, RaghavD, I didn't mean to intrude on this conversation--my main reason for responding to DawnFire is because of her concern about the pronouns used to refer to God in the Seraphs page. FTWinchester (talk) 14:28, November 27, 2013 (UTC)

Alright, cool. FTWinchester (talk) 15:59, November 27, 2013 (UTC)


Hi, I would like to ask if only adminstrators can create polls. If not, how can I? Thank you for your time.Epakrios (talk) 17:58, December 7, 2013 (UTC)

We could ask the fans what major plot event would they want to see most in Season 9. Some options I suggest are:

-Gabriel kills Abaddon onscreen(visual effects must be used)

-The reverse of Metatron's spell

-God frees Michael from the cage

-God ressurects Benny as a human

-Gabriel ressurects John Winchester and BobbyEpakrios (talk) 22:24, December 10, 2013 (UTC)

Do I have your permission to create the poll or it must be done by an adminstrator?Epakrios (talk) 22:24, December 10, 2013 (UTC)

It is done. Thanks for your help.Epakrios (talk) 19:09, December 11, 2013 (UTC)

Hello. Can I create more than 1 poll at the same time? If yes, then how?Epakrios (talk) 16:23, December 23, 2013 (UTC)

I just created 1 more. Thanks again.Epakrios (talk) 11:59, December 24, 2013 (UTC)

Make them 2 more for a total of 4 polls.Epakrios (talk) 16:40, December 24, 2013 (UTC)

I do not see where the problem is with the 4 polls. If we delete the oldest, the producers/writers may not see it. But if you strognly advise the removal, ok.Epakrios (talk) 10:36, December 25, 2013 (UTC)

Couldn't they be notified somehow? They themselves don't have a same site of their own?Epakrios (talk) 11:02, December 25, 2013 (UTC)

I do not have a Twitter account and I do not know how to use it. Also, I am not an adminstrator which I would like. If I was, then ok.Epakrios (talk) 10:43, December 26, 2013 (UTC)

It's ok. I archived it. When I think of something else, I will create it.Epakrios (talk) 18:54, January 6, 2014 (UTC)

Hello. My old username was Epakrios, but I had to create a new account on this wiki due to problems with the e-mail address. Before that, you had granted me the right to create polls. I asked ImperiexSeed and he said that you can grant it again. Also, I could edit pages and blogs with the use of templates also. Thank you for your time.Ikmeos (talk) 08:36, June 6, 2014 (UTC)

Hello. I would like to ask you if you can somehow archive the polls from my old blog with the name Polls and delete completely this blog. Thank you again.Ikmeos (talk) 22:15, June 11, 2014 (UTC)

I mean this blog which was one of my old blogs thanks to my username being changed. This blog contains the polls that I have created in the past. I meant to ask if you can archive them and delete the blog now that it's useless. Sorry if I wasn't clear before :( .Ikmeos (talk) 08:36, June 12, 2014 (UTC)

Hi. I think it is time to archive the existing poll. In my opinion, a poll must be archived when it has fullfill both of these 2 conditions:1.Exactly a month has passed since the date of its creation and 2 oner 1000 people have voted.Ikmeos (talk) 18:58, July 5, 2014 (UTC)

Hello. If it is no trouble, I suggest that you archive the poll about the mid-season finale. It has fullfilled the 2 conditions.Ikmeos (talk) 16:08, August 21, 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for the nice wordsIkmeos (talk) 16:39, August 22, 2014 (UTC)

Hi again. It's time for the old poll to be archived and my new poll to take its place. Also I suggest that you delete the first archived something-like-a-poll about where angels go after death, because it wasn't a poll. ThanksIkmeos (talk) 20:33, September 23, 2014 (UTC)

Good evening, i just created a new poll and the old one should be archived. Merry ChristmasIkmeos (talk) 18:57, December 18, 2014 (UTC)

Hello. I just created my newest poll, so it's time for the old one to go to the archive. Thank you.Ikmeos (talk) 17:54, February 3, 2015 (UTC)

Thanks again for the nice words. I wish that the showrunners would take my all my polls into consideration. From my first about the major plot of season 9(I was Epakrios then) to my newest about the showrunners. Glad to help.Ikmeos (talk) 16:00, February 5, 2015 (UTC)

Hi. I just created my newest poll and it's time for the old one to go to the archive. Thank youIkmeos (talk) 01:52, April 12, 2015 (UTC)

Hello. I think that the old poll is of no use anymore, so I created me newestc and the old one should be archived. Thank you for your time.Ikmeos (talk) 19:12, May 21, 2015 (UTC)

Hi. I just created my newest poll, so it's time for the 2 old to be archived. Thanks. Ikmeos (talk) 19:51, September 15, 2015 (UTC)

I just saw that my poll doesn't show up on the homepage. Is there any particular reason?Ikmeos (talk) 19:55, September 15, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Michael's pic[]

Oh, I didn't realize that. Well, I decided to create a new picture for the Michael article. I hope it works for now. (:
 ♥ maris ♥ we're going to heaven, clarence.   06:30, December 28, 2013 (UTC)

 ♥ maris ♥ we're going to heaven, clarence.   20:08, December 28, 2013 (UTC)

Need policing[]

Get a load of this guy. S/he keeps changing the angel template photo despite me talling him at least three times (two on the talk page, and once on the edit summary) that he can't use a season 4 photo because it is no longer an accurate representation of angels. I've reverted his/her edit three times now and s/he's done it again. I'm done. This is for you admins now. FTWinchester (talk) 20:56, January 27, 2014 (UTC)

Sorry to bother you. I did message Imperiex just in case one of you was busy. Good luck with your exams. FTWinchester (talk) 13:32, January 28, 2014 (UTC)

A humongous thank you![]

RaghavD, you're doing phenomenally well in your edits. You're exceedingly helpful and, I'll be honest, you've made my job a lot easier by making pages that I didn't get around to making. Your edits do not get breezed over, at least not by me, and they're much appreciated. -- ImperiexSeed, 12:36 PM, February 13th 2014

everyone is saying Castiel proclaimed himself the Whinchesters Guardian Angel but is more fond of Dean, do you know what episode he says this in?

Chepesh21 (talk)Chepesh21Chepesh21 (talk)

chat room[]

hello, could you please join me in the chat room? Dean.winchestor.54 (talk) 07:19, June 9, 2014 (UTC)

I am on now, please meet me in the chat room Dean.winchestor.54 (talk) 08:38, June 9, 2014 (UTC)

Edit War[]

I don't want to enter another edit war, so I need you to weigh in on this. Dean.winchestor.54 is redirecting Demon Host Restoration ritual|Demon Host Restoration Ritual to Human Body Restoration Ritual. I move that this is unnecessary and erroneous, on the grounds that, 

i) the ritual was never mentioned nor showed to be capable of restoring ANY human being.

ii) the only time it was shown was for a corpse that used to be possessed by a demon

Not only is the redirection unnecessary when a completely fine and accurate page already exists, the new title is also inaccurate, since like I said above, we have no proof it could restore any human being. I tried to explain this to him but he keeps reverting his edits. I told him that major overhauls usually requires the consent/agreement of other members, if not just to be polite, but I just want to make sure this dispute is frozen until somebody else weighs in. We made this page together, so it would really be nice to know what you think of this. FTWinchester (talk) 20:27, July 21, 2014 (UTC)

Imperiexseed weighed in initially on our side but changed his mind. I don't know. Whatever, the show sucks now anyway. FTWinchester (talk) 00:13, July 25, 2014 (UTC)


Hey sorry to bug you but on the Dean Winchester and Castiel page people have been putting false information that suits their ship. I already removed it and put the info that supports the canon. This is getting exhausting. Some of this info has been up for a couple of weeks. Message me. TheTardisAndTheImpala67 (talk) 19:59, August 17, 2014 (UTC) 

"Castiel has a very close relationship with Dean, much closer than he and Sam. Castiel and Dean have shown to have a "profound bond", as Castiel put it, meaning they have a strongfriendship, connection, and loyalty to each other. Dean has expressed to Castiel that he needs him, and, though never said, Castiel needs Dean too. There is an apparent possibility that Castiel may be in love with Dean, but this, of course, is just fan speculation. But the customer is always right...." I mean seriously? Look at this crap.TheTardisAndTheImpala67 (talk) 20:04, August 17, 2014 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I know you must have better things to do but in the Dean Winchester there's constant vandalism that I undid three times. Please message me when you have time.TheTardisAndTheImpala67 (talk) 06:24, August 19, 2014 (UTC)

It's all good, thank you very much. Sad to hear that, why? (if you don't mind telling me) are there any admins active? (reply anytime you want, I can wait)TheTardisAndTheImpala67 (talk) 10:09, August 19, 2014 (UTC)


Thanks, man! I'm a bit apprehensive but hopefully I'll get the hang of it soon. Good luck with your work! And I hope you don't mind me hitting up your talk page when I have a question. Thanks, again. FTWinchester (talk) 13:55, November 22, 2014 (UTC)

Sure! I'll let you know once I can find my way better. FTWinchester (talk) 14:19, November 22, 2014 (UTC)

Unlock the archangels page, please[]

Hey, please unlock the page. Here's my revision under the powers and abilities section, which there's nothing wrong with, but EmpyreanSmoke kept removing it to put his, creating the edit war. It's clear how strong the archangels are, but he kept undoing my edits to demean and humiliate them from how they're actually portrayed. -- ImperiexSeed, 8:13 PM, November 22nd 2014

Once again, ImperiexSeed is twisting what actually happened. A while ago, he revised the power section of the archangel page. Today, I changed a few things on that section, so that it resided more with canon. There was nothing wrong with my edit, but ImperiexSeed kept undoing it. I kept telling him that my edit was fine, and asked him to please stop the edit war. Thank you for locking the page, and please don't unlock it for now

Admin query[]

Hey! How's it going? Man, Caleb was right. This job lS janitorial. lt's quite different from the status symbol a lot of users seem to be clamoring about. Still, it's nice to take a look at things behind the usual and be able to clean up more than usual. Speaking of which, how often do you check the broken redirects, dead-end pages, unused media, etc.? Thanks! Stay awesome! FTWinchester (talk) 15:11, November 25, 2014 (UTC)

Yeah, l'm aware of it--l have started working on some of them since the weekend but it's quite overwhelming to be honest. lt should be alright to cover them gradually instead of all at once, right? FTWinchester (talk) 16:00, November 25, 2014 (UTC)

By the way, if you could take a look at the policies l've written, just in case you have something to add or change? l'm still waiting for Caleb to comment on it. He did say they were a good idea, though. lf and when you get the chance. FTWinchester (talk) 16:17, November 25, 2014 (UTC)

That's true. It will help cut down all the noise on bias, though, if we manage to implement it properly. Thanks for the input! FTWinchester (talk) 03:27, November 26, 2014 (UTC)

Hey, buddy. I was wondering if you could weigh in on my blog about empyrean's case. I feel like I'm repeating myself several times over. I would greatly appreciate it, especially since you are a senior admin. Thank you so much. FTWinchester (talk) 01:18, December 3, 2014 (UTC)

I've been meaning to ask you about the main page. I've been exploring the tools, but I can't seem to find a way to update the main page navigation with the latest episode? It's 2 episodes late, I think. FTWinchester (talk) 02:26, December 4, 2014 (UTC)


Hey td5 here, I tried making it but it didn't upload. Can you do it, please? Just busy most of this week; selling a house tomorrow need to finish paper work. Thanks.[[User:Twilight Despair 5|]] ([[The God of Creation]]) (talk) 18:26, December 4, 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. Do I have to write my answers to the questions on the page itself?[[User:Twilight Despair 5|]] ([[The God of Creation]]) (talk) 17:02, December 5, 2014 (UTC)

I answered your questions if want to see. Thanks again for making the page.[[User:Twilight Despair 5|]] ([[The God of Creation]]) (talk) 13:49, December 6, 2014 (UTC)


Hello, EmpyreanSmoke here. If you have the time, I would like to talk in private. Do you have a Facebook, Twitter, Kik, or some other form of place where would could chat in private? Please message me back as soon as you can. Thanks in advance.

I followed you on Twitter. Please follow me back so we can message.

Mainpage + Slider[]

Is there a reason we are keeping the slider coding separate from the main page? I want to update it weekly but having to find two different templates to edit and see if both were working fine together is a bit frustrating. Please advise. Thanks! FTWinchester (talk) 17:29, December 16, 2014 (UTC)

It's just that in another wiki I contribute to, the main page itself has the slider coding/template, which I thought looked easier. But never mind then. I suppose I really can't change the slider yet since the episode synopses of the most recent ones were still lacking. FTWinchester (talk) 23:56, December 19, 2014 (UTC)


Thank you. Starting after Xmas I'll be on much more, but if there is something you would like for me too do every as an admin let me know. 12:43, December 20, 2014 (UTC)

That was me td5 I was on my new mobile forgot to log in. [[User:Twilight Despair 5|]] ([[The God of Creation]]) (talk) 12:45, December 20, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Hey![]

Hello! Yes, I was. ^___^ Gourgeist (talk) 16:01, December 20, 2014 (UTC)

Late last year I believe! I changed it here! Oh, the messages appear just above! I never talked much to anyone before, so that's why it might appear as if I have an archive. Gourgeist (talk) 16:10, December 20, 2014 (UTC)

Oh, since we're talking already, can I ask if Bibbing requires an article? I'd be eager to work on it if so. Gourgeist (talk) 16:12, December 20, 2014 (UTC)

Thank you! Gourgeist (talk) 16:17, December 20, 2014 (UTC)

Need your assistance[]

Hi, RaghavD. As you may have noticed, several users have been spamming flame and criticism war against each other apparently from an old argument they had from other websites. Discussion could be found here. I tried to find a way to mediate but things have gotten so blown out of proportion that the only option I see is to just block everyone involved as pretty much everyone had no significant contributions to the actual wiki itself. I would really appreciate for you to weigh in on this. Thanks. FTWinchester (talk) 23:35, December 23, 2014 (UTC)

I think it's quite alright. They've been banned and Caleb already stepped in that night on chat as things were wrapping up. Thanks for responding, though. Happy holidays! FTWinchester (talk) 13:47, December 25, 2014 (UTC)


Due to leaving death and rape threats, ResonX was perm banned from this wiki. Since he has created another account, BennyCupster, can you please block him and his IP adress, so he can't make another account? Thanks. EmpyreanSmoke (talk) 06:46, December 28, 2014 (UTC)

Setting things straight[]

You and other legitimate users of this site have been deceived.

User:ResonX2 is not me. It is a sockpuppet created by the group of vicious cyberbullies led by Willow Giovanna for the sole purpose of undermining me here. I said none of the horrible things it said in chat while claiming to be me.

Furthermore, all of the non-regular users present in chat during that incident, including User:OneHamMan, User:MAJOR  KOMAROV, User:AutismPirate and User:Whinayayay (a sock puppet of the previously-banned-for-harassment User:Whinaaay), are all members of said trolling group. This is provable from the accounts' previous history consisting of repeatedly vandalizing my personal sites.

The conspiracy nature of this is also evident from the fact that the entire incident was posted on a website operated by the bullies and dedicated to attacking and defaming me, here.

And now, the troll accounts User:ChingWhinWhon and User:Scombridae are repeatedly vandalizing my talk page with "chastisement" for "my" actions, repeatedly re-adding their spamming messages whenever I remove them, and claiming that I cannot moderate my own talk page.

I don't exactly have a right to bring you to active involvement in going after these criminals outside this site, but I do want the record to be set straight here with the ResonX account unbanned just for reference while all the offending accounts are permanently banned, and for it to be understood that I did not say those horrible things.

BennyCupster (talk) 03:51, January 2, 2015 (UTC)

You do realize that link that you say is proof is empty right? Scombridae (talk) 03:57, January 2, 2015 (UTC)

Admin rights[]

Hello, RaghavD. Are you suggested, I messaged FTWinchester and TD5 about giving me another chance at being and admin, and so far TD5 has responded. Like you, he said that I should ask the other admins what they think, and said that he was not against me getting me rights back. EmpyreanSmoke (talk) 02:31, May 3, 2015 (UTC)

Calebchiam said that if I got the approval of the admins and/or established users, then he would give me the rights back. There is no need to convince him, because he is the one who said I needed your guys approval for getting the rights back. EmpyreanSmoke (talk) 17:01, May 3, 2015 (UTC)

Re:Community Choice Awards[]

Hello! What's your take on a community choice awards as suggested by wikia staff Gcheung28? Her complete proposal is at the bottom of my talk page. It looks interesting but I've been quite removed from recent episodes and I only focus more on clean up. Thanks! FTWinchester (talk) 17:13, May 15, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Supernatural Community Choice Awards - Season 10[]

Hey, RaghavD! Glad to see that you're interested in this! We could definitely use as much admin input as possible to get this running, but FTWinchester said he wanted some admin consensus before getting started? I'm not sure if he's already reached out and majority is on board, but I'd like to get this going by the end of the week if possible since the season is ending already! Grace (profile)•(talk) 20:23, May 20, 2015 (UTC)

Sure! We wanted to actually have users submit their nominations in each category, so I can post a Google doc or something in a blog today and we can start gathering nominations! The categories I was thinking of doing were: Favorite Villain, Favorite Male Character, Favorite Female Character, Favorite Guest Star, Most Shocking Moment, Saddest Moment, Best Plot Twist, and maybe 1 more? If you think there are better categories or you have ideas for a last category, please let me know! Once we pick the categories, we can start asking for nominations :) Grace (profile)•(talk) 15:58, May 21, 2015 (UTC)

That's cool too! What "Worst" categories would you like to see? It would be nice to keep it to a max of 10 categories just so it's manageable when tallying nominations. Let me know what specific categories you'd like to see and which ones on my list should be replaced :D Grace (profile)•(talk) 19:38, May 21, 2015 (UTC)

Sounds good! So we have Favorite Villain, Favorite Male Character, Favorite Female Character, Favorite Guest Star, Favorite Minor Character, Most Shocking Moment, Saddest Moment, and Best Plot Twist? If this list is cool with you (feel free to talk to other admins), I'll post something today. Can you promote the link in the main page slider and maybe through a Community Message once it's up? Grace (profile)•(talk) 15:43, May 22, 2015 (UTC)

Perfect, we're live! Thanks for your help :D Grace (profile)•(talk) 18:43, May 22, 2015 (UTC)

You can just link to it like an article page! If you want, I can throw something up on the slider for it. Grace (profile)•(talk) 16:24, May 26, 2015 (UTC)

The text was a bit long so I edited it to make it fit :) Other than that, you did it all correctly! Just wondering though, it seems like you guys have a lot of templates within templates on the main page. Was there a specific reason behind that? Grace (profile)•(talk) 18:16, May 27, 2015 (UTC)

I think it wouldn't be a problem at all to move most things (if not all) from the templates to just live on the main page. If you'd like, I, or someone from our team, could even help with giving the main page a new look with image headers and whatnot! The content might be a little hard to read since the page is mostly transparent too :) Let me know if you and the admins are interested in any help with redesigning! Grace (profile)•(talk) 14:28, June 1, 2015 (UTC)

I think we can skip the request part this time around! Let me know what the admin team thinks :D Grace (profile)•(talk) 14:35, June 1, 2015 (UTC)

Voting blog is up! If you could change the link in the slider and send out another community message to promote it, that would be great! Grace (profile)•(talk) 20:21, June 1, 2015 (UTC)

Awesome! Hopefully we can get started on that soon, and of course you guys have the final say on what get changed :) Grace (profile)•(talk) 21:08, June 3, 2015 (UTC)


Could you do something about this anon? He or She keeps messing with pages and changing the language Gabriel456 (talk) 16:42, May 21, 2015 (UTC)

You're welcome, and thanks :) Gabriel456 (talk) 17:39, May 21, 2015 (UTC)

Me again. The anon is back, and continuing their efforts to constantly change the language Gabriel456 (talk) 12:18, June 3, 2015 (UTC)

Thanks again, and you're welcome :) Gabriel456 (talk) 13:45, June 4, 2015 (UTC)


Hey! Could you meet me on chat? There's something I'd like to discuss with some users. Tysonjackson (talk) 01:26, May 29, 2015 (UTC)


Hey! Here's what I wanted to discuss with everyone! :D Tysonjackson (talk) 01:41, May 30, 2015 (UTC)


Do you mean from wikia staff, and what they recommend?[[User:Twilight Despair 5|]] ([[The God of Creation]]) (talk) 16:24, June 1, 2015 (UTC)

Ok then message some examples and let's discuss it. Also, some of the power pages I would like to redo. Namely the Kinesis pages. Most of the wikia agree that, Telekinesis is the base power that can manipulate or influence any kind of object or being. Biokinesis is specifically control over life-force/energy. Same with Pyrokinesis can only create and/or control Fire, etc. My point is if they like Crowley have Telekinesis than how they use it, like making a prophet explode is under telekinesis. Now like Eve's powers are biokinesis as they directly and only deal with controlling it altering an beings chemical or Cellular structure. Now Michael's Pyrokinesis is an exception as he also can create fire and separately use telekinesis, not just manipulate pre-existing Fire. See my point. Listing every single method of a power as a separate poweron each character is not needed, some powers fall under more broad ones and some are very specific. [[User:Twilight Despair 5|]] ([[The God of Creation]]) (talk) 17:46, June 1, 2015 (UTC)

I know what you meant, by wikia remake sorry for the confusion. Just this also brought up this issue.[[User:Twilight Despair 5|]] ([[The God of Creation]]) (talk) 21:05, June 2, 2015 (UTC)

Well, in summation, I would be somewhat open to this kind of list.



As with specially the elements unless they can generate them like Michael or Castiel, it is just a specific method of controlling a precise force or object. As if a character lost their Telekinetic power, under this list they would lose all the advance methods that would be listed below as Telekinesis is the power and ones like Pyro or Biokinesis is just a technique of it. The only time they should be listed away from under Telekinesis, is like Michael or Castiel as they generate fire not manipulating pre-existing Fire. And I highly doubt the writers will say that an angel making fire is just Telekinesis making molecules vibrate to produce fire. Also I think Holy White Light should be renamed Photokinesis or Angelic light as the light is derived from the angel itself.

I look forward to the changed to the wikia the Wikia Staff want to introduce.[[User:Twilight Despair 5|]] ([[The God of Creation]]) (talk) 02:11, June 4, 2015 (UTC)

Re:Wiki Redesign[]

She should go ahead - Wikia Staff know more than most anyone about elegant and effective page design. Perhaps you can liaise with her and give her the necessary input if she has any queries about certain elements? Cheers. Calebchiam Talk 11:28, June 3, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Main page[]

I'm down for it. Honestly, it's what I've been trying to tell both you and Caleb. In the Buffy wikia, an admin can edit the mainpage itself and change all contents from there, without having to edit the templates themselves. That is if the other admins agree. Or I don't know. I think it mught be too late for my response. Sorry. FTWinchester (talk) 03:13, June 9, 2015 (UTC)

Main page redesign[]

Hey RaghavD! I'm Mark, from Wikia's Community Development Team. I believe my colleague Grace talked to you a while back about redesigning the main page of the wikia, so that it looks a bit better and no longer uses an inception-based template system (templates within templates). I've spent a bit of time reworking the current main page, and you can view the first version of the redesign on my test wikia.

I've tried to keep the content similar to that of the current mainpage, but the design has changed quite a bit. I'd love to hear your thoughts on the design, and whether you or the community would like to see anything changed.

Please note that my test wikia naturally does not have all the pages this wikia has, and as such the main page may have several red links. These should disappear once the main page is moved live on this wikia.

Once you're happy with the way it looks, let me know, and I'll put it live on the wikia right away. Looking forward to hearing from you! Mark (talk) 03:31, June 26, 2015 (UTC)

That's correct. You only need to edit the main page in order to add/remove content. The styling will be added to a separate CSS file though, but that's shouldn't need changing. If any of the styling does need changing, feel free to drop me a message and I'll gladly change it. Mark (talk) 17:19, July 6, 2015 (UTC)
The updated main page is live. Mark (talk) 17:43, July 6, 2015 (UTC)

Supernatural Q&A[]

Hey there! We're going to have a chance to talk with some Supernatural people at San Diego Comic-Con, but wanted to get questions from some fans! Could you promote this blog on the main page and wherever else you think is good so we can start collecting questions? Thanks! Grace (profile)•(talk) 21:25, July 1, 2015 (UTC)


I was just gonna ask: do you like supernatural?

Please delete my hate blog on Sam!![]

Please delete my hate blog on Sam!! -- ImperiexSeed, 1:13 PM, September 26th 2015

Is TwilightDespair5 also an admin? Because they already told ImperixSeed that he was not going to delete his blog, so doing so would be going behind their back. It might be ok to keep it is a evidence for ImperixSeed's hate against Sam Winchester as we were saying on one of the comments, and as EmpreyanSmoke said he already went against a similar statement as this and tricked the community. Instead of deleting the blog can you make it so no one else can add more fan-fiction and hateful comments to it?

Re: Adminship[]

Thank you, and that other stuff is just water under the bridge. So what do you want my opinion on? EmpyreanSmoke (talk) 16:30, October 24, 2015 (UTC)


I am having problems with the user known as SeraphLucifer. He broke the three revert rule. He keeps adding non-cannon information. He keeps saying Archangels can kill knights of hell. He doesn't even say possibly, to imply they possibly can, yet leaving the possibility they can't. He is saying they can for certain even though we've never seen a knight of hell be killed by anything but the 1st blade. I've repeatedly warned him to stop and put my reasoning for it . He refuses and just undoes my edits without argument whatsoever. His only argument, was something along the lines of "In the lore it says the archangels could kill them."

There are two major problems with this argument.  The first being: the lore greatly differs from the show. For example Lucifer is a Cherub in the lore and Michael is a seraph. Yet, in the show, both are archangels. This is just one of many differences.

Number 2: Even if we do give him the benefit of the doubt, The Knights were created by the writers purely for plot. Their is absolutely no lore on The Knights whatsoever. So that's obviously a lie.

Please ban him as it is corrupting the wikia. Thank you. 22:32, November 12, 2015 (UTC)

Re. Imperiex's Ban[]

Maybe it was too harsh, but he had more chances and warnings than anyone here. I don't want to seem unfair, so I'll reduce the block to two months sounds better. One is to short in my opinion, but why the offense is somewhat minor it wasn't his first one. I'll reduce his block now. But if this continues after his block it will be restored back to a year.[[User:Twilight Despair 5|]] ([[The God of Creation]]) (talk) 17:41, January 8, 2016 (UTC)

Well, I set it back to March 1, 2016 it would be improper to continue reduce or increase it. But, it happens again even the smallest offense, the year minimal block with be restored at that moment. He has no more chances or warnings, same for Empyrean if he comes back. Also wikia ban for the network is hard, and I don't want to waste anymore of my time on them than I have too.[[User:Twilight Despair 5|]] ([[The God of Creation]]) (talk) 18:13, January 8, 2016 (UTC)

RE: Main page[]

Hi RaghavD,

I've fixed the main page issues. Looks like the styling broke due to the verbatim tag no longer being supported. Moving over the CSS code to MediaWiki:Wikia.css has fixed the issue. Mark (talk) 17:00, January 18, 2016 (UTC)

The poll voters issue should be fixed now as well. Mark (talk) 17:28, January 18, 2016 (UTC)
Thanks, Mark for looking into it, and RaghavD for continuing to work on this. I got real caught up with work. FTWinchester (talk) 01:14, January 19, 2016 (UTC)
You're very welcome! And the poll issue should be properly fixed now. Mark (talk) 16:44, January 19, 2016 (UTC)
Your contributions are just as significant. Besides, even 99/100, 100/100 or even 200/100 are fractions. FTWinchester (talk) 14:23, January 21, 2016 (UTC)


Users have asked me, to check the IP address of Thepsychofroggy to see if he/she is Imperiex on another account. I should know but can't seem to be able to check and match IP addresses, thanks.[[User:Twilight Despair 5|]] ([[The God of Creation]]) (talk) 20:32, January 22, 2016 (UTC)


Hi RaghavD, I am doing sort of a survey, I just want to learn your opinions about my edits, if you could reply I'd be grateful. SeraphLucifer (talk) 18:03, January 25, 2016 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Well, I am trying to contribute and improve this wikia as much as I can. Do you think my edits are useful, correct and helpful? I don't know if you saw or check them but if you seen them, a feedback about my edits would help me to learn how they look like from another persons' point of view and it will help me to improve myself. Thanks. SeraphLucifer (talk) 18:12, January 25, 2016 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Thank you for feedback, appreciated. SeraphLucifer (talk) 18:48, January 25, 2016 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Bot request[]

Hello. I'm a bureaucrat at the Ben 10 wiki, and I'm here to help this wiki become as good as the series. I'll be editing a lot during the next few weeks, and I'd like to know if the admins here would approve of my request for a bot. Although a bot requires community approval, and not just admin approval, I think it proper to ask you guys first. I already use a bot on the Ben 10 wiki, and you can check my work there if you'd like.

Orion (T-B-C) 22:10, January 25, 2016 (UTC)

As far as I know, bot edits don't appear in Recent Wiki Activity and are only visible in Recent Changes if the user specifically asks for it.

Orion (T-B-C) 07:46, January 26, 2016 (UTC)

Slight miswording in the previous comment: not "asks" in the sense that they have to ask Wikia to enable it. There's a setting on Recent Changes that displays (or hides) bot edits. Just wanted to clarify that.

Orion (T-B-C) 10:09, January 26, 2016 (UTC)

It sounded like sarcasm to me. It also doesn't explain why Tessa was the only one to complain about the confused, wailing souls who were unable to enter Heaven, or how Azazel was able to possess her, or how she was able to freely enter and exit a building with angel warding, back when Alastair was trying to kill two Reapers. Dean could also have been referencing the fact that Reapers are often called Angels of Death.

Orion (T-B-C) 10:13, January 26, 2016 (UTC)

For the record, this isn't about liking or disliking the potential addition; this is about the addition not being real in the first place because it doesn't match anything we've seen. I'm not one to conflate what I like or believe with this - or any other - series' lore.

Orion (T-B-C) 10:43, January 26, 2016 (UTC)

There might be an edit war on the way with the Reapers article. I'll refrain from editing it further, but I maintain that Reapers are not angels. As I've mentioned to another user, I think the fact that they've repeatedly been shown to be immune to angel warding (including in season 9, FYI) is proof enough.

Orion (T-B-C) 11:29, January 26, 2016 (UTC)

About the changes in the Men of Letters article[]

Good night, RaghavD. I noticed you did some changes in the Men of Letters article, excluding the external links I added to it. I would like to know why. Is it forbidden to add external links according to the Wikia policies? EleassarBR (talk) 00:14, January 26, 2016 (UTC)


Ehm, I didn't realized subcategories. I thought it only included Trucker Cupid. Sorry. SeraphLucifer (talk) 13:51, January 26, 2016 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Wiki clean up[]

You online? FTWinchester (talk) 13:30, January 31, 2016 (UTC)

Yes, that was what I was primarily doing recently. And now that we cleared that up, I moved on to the other issues. I've cleared the templates but I have to take a closer look into the infoboxes but I would need more time as it is more complex. I was just wondering if we could come up with better ways to implement maintenance, and maybe if we need new admins. What do you think? FTWinchester (talk) 14:21, January 31, 2016 (UTC)

Oh ya and I've been working on broken links, dead-end and orphaned pages, too since I became admin, but I can never keep up because as soon as I fix one issue, 2 more pop up in its place. FTWinchester (talk) 14:23, January 31, 2016 (UTC)

Well for obivous reasons we have to pick out contributors with good background. Even before I agreed to become an admin this place always had a shortage of them. But if that's how you feel, then never mind. FTWinchester (talk) 17:40, January 31, 2016 (UTC)


Heya RaghavD, good to see you. I saw that you edited Alpha Borderwalk and its been a long time since you are gone. Are you planning on returning? SeraphLucifer (talk) 11:37, March 23, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Season 13 Title Card for the main page:


Forum talk[]

There is a discussion occurring on how we should format the Season pages and the episode summaries. Please join the discussion.Click here --ThomasNealy (talk) 05:07, December 14, 2017 (UTC)

Category Suggestion[]

Hey, i created a blog post about a new category, that i suggested to WarG and he agreed to ask to the others admins, see the post here. Doctor49 (talk) 00:26, January 9, 2018 (UTC)


The debate on what goes on the monster page has been reopened. Your opinion on the issue would be welcome. you can find the link here Talk:Monster#Monsters_omitted_part_2 Thank you--ThomasNealy (talk) 22:53, January 19, 2018 (UTC)


Your rights have been or will be removed due to Inactivity and Community Decision.

Thanks! Admin // Dominic1743 (Talk | Contribs | Logs) 18:19, December 27, 2019 (UTC)