Re: Discussions[edit source]

Hello, I'm one of WG18's fellow admins. I normally wouldn't answer for someone, but it has been duscussed in the past and we lack numbers to police the discussions for rule and ToC violations. The various users are still understaffed and adding more to police would make the much harder and lower the quality of our work. Zane T 69 (talk) 15:28, September 14, 2017 (UTC)

We have five trustworthy users, who I consider above reproach and would entrust such responsibilities to, and those users are the most active. Our community is quite dead and the show that it's about loses popularity with every episode. I'm not trying to rude, but as votes go, mine will be a no and I see no need to burden a limited team further. This feature has only been requested twice in the past and that's too little a demand for us admins to sacrifice for. Zane T 69 (talk) 16:57, September 14, 2017 (UTC)

We have far too few reliable editors. Rollback candidates are increasingly more difficult to find, as mentioned there are only five of them I would consider. We have a lot of viewers, I'll agree with that, but the wiki needs editors who will contribute useful and trustworthy material. We simply put can't divide our attention further, most of our Admins have real-life to deal with and we have two active admins, zero B-Crats, and I think zero Rollbacks. We need to maintain our focus on building up key wiki infrastructure and beat out our rivals. I'm sorry, it's an unequivocal no for me. Zane T 69 (talk) 19:45, September 14, 2017 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.