Hi, welcome to Supernatural Wiki! Thanks for your edit to the Raphael page.
Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help you with anything!
Also note that we are in the process of converting articles written in the present tense to the past tense. So you are welcome to edit any such article you come across. Once again, Welcome! Calebchiam (talk) 12:08, December 6, 2015 (UTC)
I don't know. I don't think I'm even the right person to ask, to be honest. You should ask one of the admins, to name two: Twilight Despair 5 and RaghavD Gabriel456 (talk) 17:28, January 5, 2016 (UTC)
Hey Kajune. Castiel used to be a common angel, thats why I wrote "formerly" and Seraphim is another type of species (still in celestial category yes). SeraphLucifer (talk) 14:04, April 1, 2016 (UTC)SeraphLucifer
Hey Kajune, do you mean like removing the visual image of category, if so you should edit on classic editor and delete the image, I hope it will help. SeraphLucifer (talk) 05:47, March 26, 2016 (UTC)SeraphLucifer
Hey Kajune, I changed Bobby's picture not because it was bad, we should add the latest version of characters. This was his last apperance so I think it would be better. SeraphLucifer (talk) 13:51, April 1, 2016 (UTC)SeraphLucifer
Re Profile Pics.Edit
Hey Kajune, I think that you are actually right, there wasn't much difference between Bobby's new and old one, only old one was better as you said. I just update them since many people visit the wikia each day and I wanted to show them the latest appearence of characters. You are free to change it, its a free wikia :). SeraphLucifer (talk) 15:20, April 6, 2016 (UTC)SeraphLucifer
Hey Kajune, hope your doing fine. I think you should be an admin since we don't have active admins around here, only TD5 sometimes... I think you are honest and a trustworthy editor. If you want to be an admin, I'd support you. SeraphLucifer (talk) 17:41, May 9, 2016 (UTC)SeraphLucifer
RE: Admin nomination Edit
To be clear, I'd only remove speculation from articles. Obviously, users are free to speculate, they just have to keep it off of articles. Unfortunately, some speculation passes for fact if it seems reasonable, which, to me, is still speculation. That's the main type I'd purge from articles.
Re: God heals Lucifer Edit
I don't think it's repetitive to use one image on two pages (Lucifer and Healing). I just think it fits into the context. Feel free to add (or propose) another scene from the latest episode to the page though. Lambda1 (talk) 00:57, May 13, 2016 (UTC)
Enabling parents are the ones who let their kids do whatever they want and fix every problem they cause (as Chuck did), thus preventing their children from learning from their mistakes.
I swear you're wrong. By stepping down, not interfering, God was "enabling". He stopped fixing humanity's problems once he saw it did no good. Watch the episode, seriously. Kajune (talk) 13:08, May 16, 2016 (UTC)
And I swear you're wrong. Why don't you watch the episode? He was interfering, constantly, and it did no good, because he realized all it did was enable humanity's bad behavior. He stepped down because of it.
I really don't want to keep arguing. But look up the dictionary. I also updated God's page after checking the episode. Really. Kajune (talk) 13:14, May 16, 2016 (UTC)
Look up "enabling" in regards to parenting. Really.
Hell, just look up grammar. "A is no longer B. It's C". Meaning, "A is not B any more. Now A is C".
You make absolutely no sense to me. "Enabling" equals "interfering"? I've watched the latest episode like what, six times, or more? Kajune (talk) 13:25, May 16, 2016 (UTC)
For Chuck's sake, just look up "enabling" in regards to parenting.
Yes well, we're talking about what Chuck himself said, and what he believed. His interfence produced no results, so he left, stepped down. Chuck, said enabling was parenting. That is how a parent should raise a child. Kajune (talk) 13:35, May 16, 2016 (UTC)
No, he said that being over involved wasn't parenting, that it (being over involved) was enabling.
I get why you think that, but look at the whole statement, really. "Enabling" means to give authority to someone, to give someone the power to do something. In Chuck's case, it was giving humans the authority to decide what's right and what's wrong. Chuck had previously punished humans as a way of teaching them what was right and wrong, but since doing that fixed nothing, he allowed them to decide, by stepping down himself. Since Chuck believed this yielded positive results, he saw it as (good) parenting. I swear, very little of that is speculation. Kajune (talk) 13:47, May 16, 2016 (UTC)
For the umpteenth time, look up "enabling" in the context of parenting (which was the context of the conversation). What you're saying doesn't apply, period.
Whatever. Like I sad, I hate arguments. This wikia has nothing to do with me anyway. I won't touch anything if it satisfies you. Kajune (talk) 14:04, May 16, 2016 (UTC)
If you're not willing to look up "enabling" in regards to parenting, then why tell me to do something similar? Or did you look it up and are just unwilling to admit you're wrong?
EDIT: I guess it doesn't really matter, in the grand scheme of things, as long as the correct information is on the article.
I'm not feeling very well, but I've come back because this wikia looks like it needs some help following the latest episode. Kajune (talk) 15:05, May 20, 2016 (UTC)
RE: Battle in "We Happy Few" Edit
I don't know. Truth be told, I don't really care about those articles, and I don't see the point in them either.
I don't like that they are, but since it is fact, I can't deny it. We see Tessa in her true reaper form in season 2, and we see Alastair using Death's scythe to kill reapers in season 4. Clearly, at this point, reapers weren't celestial beings. However, from Stairway to Heaven onwards, reapers are undeniably angels. Hannah knows Tessa by name, an angel blade can kill a reaper, they glow like angels when stabbed to death, and since there has been no statement as to what a reaper is or where it came from, an angel is what they are. That's, my opinion, and why. Kajune (talk) 15:29, May 26, 2016 (UTC)
RE: Status Unknown Edit
I'm not an admin. A question like that should be answered by an admin.
Just go for it. Worst case-scenario, it gets deleted by an admin. However, keep in mind there's not much to say. It's a dark hole somewhere. We know nothing about it.
Re: Categorization Edit
Actually, you're doing a great job. That's the whole point of the wiki--for us to provide information on the canon. And we were missing a lot of info from the latest seasons--info you know have filled. See you soon! FTWinchester (talk) 15:19, July 17, 2016 (UTC)
RE: Minor edit Edit
Marks your edit as a minor edit. Doesn't really matter unless you're monitoring RecentChanges.
Hey Kajune as I told, a military coup happened in my country, I will lose my internet connection most probably, I'd be pleased if you could tell the others my situation, I won't be here for long I guess... Cheers... SeraphLucifer (talk) 21:30, July 15, 2016 (UTC)SeraphLucifer
You do have a point, but most of those names weren't even used more than once. We can place them in Trivia Section I guess, what's your opinion? SeraphLucifer (talk) 16:05, July 16, 2016 (UTC)SeraphLucifer
But as I told, there are lots of unnecessary ones in the title/alias section. For Example: Ken Doll (Dean), Coward (God), Alpha Male Monkey Friend (Dean), Bratty Child (Lucifer)... These type of words are used as insults... SeraphLucifer (talk) 16:26, July 16, 2016 (UTC)SeraphLucifer
Hey, Caleb finally got back to me. If you want to be a rollback, feel free to request those rights from him. When I thought of potential rollback users, you were the first name that came to mind. Zane T 69 (talk) 16:48, August 5, 2016 (UTC)
Re:Reapers are AngelsEdit
Thanks Kajune for participating this topic. I'd be grateful if you post that on FTW's wall either. We should judge everything then decide. As I said, I am currently uncertain applying this changes since there are still holes. Also I'd like to add a few things about what you wrote:
First of all, it was Tessa's true form. Tessa herself admit that:
"You didn't give me much choice. You saw my true form and you flipped out".
Also I don't think Tessa owned a vessel. She and Dean both agreed that she can appear however a Reaper wanted to.
Reapers being able to use "angel radio" is completely wrong or plot hole. Maurice, did not know who Castiel is. He had no clue about Castiel. In Season 6, every single angel knew or learned who Castiel is. Reapers maybe weren't sided with Castiel or Raphael since Reapers aren't a part of Heaven, Hell nor Purgatory but if they could use the radio, Maurice could contact with Bart without a meeting and did not need more information about him. Besides that, there is no single indication that Reapers could the angel radio. Also I don't remember that scene.
Billie teleported in 11x17 when Dean had a fatal shock (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J8aoSb14cwM). You are right that angels call themselves angel no matter what their class are. But I guess that was like the conversation between Bart and Maurice. Your kind, my kind of thing.
By the way, every single angel lost their wings no matter they were on Earth or Heaven. Grigori's case is still a secret. They might be healed by soul feeding, it is unclear. Also I'd like to mention that angels' wings aren't healed yet, they can appear at anywhere when they descend from Heaven just as in 11x02 and 11x09. They didn't teleport but arrived.
For last, you are totally right about angels not roaming Earth for 2000 years. It is one of Castiel's wrong statements.
Well, leaving a corpse is quite confusing, however they might actually formed a physical form. Like horsemen. It is unclear anyways just a prediction.
Most creatures have telepathic links, Reapers may have that too but there is no indications that they could use angel radio. Also Maurice's lack of knowledge about Castiel definetly proves that they weren't able to use angel radio. Even in that episode Bart stated; your kind, my kind thing. Don't get me wrong by the way, not trying to be offensive :D.
Well about wings we have a certain statement. Lower angels completely lost their wings as in 8x23, however stronger/higher angels kept their wings just like Gadreel and Cas (When he regained his grace). Lucifer, far stronger than Cas and he was unaffected by the spell. Spells affect depends on angels strenght apparently. We know that spell also affected the angels on Earth, but the ones who fell from Heaven, was physically weakened compared to them. Some even died.
Thanks for participating. I'd like to point out that most of your points appear to have been fitted to work with the retcon, when in face value upon introduction, those exact same points were used to delineate reapers from angels. There are too many discrepancies for the retcon to work. But for the sake of discussion, I'll parse the points you raised.
- There are the other classes of angels who resided on Earth during this time too, as part of their duty.
True. It could retroactively be made to support the claim, but it is not a strong argument about reapers being angels. Point being, I can come up with a completely random creature (say, hell cats), re-classify it as an "angel" and this argument could still support the claim despite the differences between actual angels and "hell cats".
- Tessa's true form, which Dean witnessed in season 2, was an illusion
- What Dean saw was not a true form
Blatant disregard for what was shown visually and what was told literally by the character. Dean saw the skeletal "true" form, and in Tessa's words, he "flipped out". The only dead reaper I remember in Kirpke's era was in Death Takes A Holiday, and it occurred when Sam and Dean were projected into the spiritual plane, hence them being able to see reapers without any further aid. Had they been manifesting in natural, physical human form AND seen the reaper corpse, then I would agree with this. Anything that came after Kirpke, of course, would support this, because the new era started this notion that reapers are angels. So visually, April Kelly's death leaving a corpse is about as canon as angels suddenly becoming white smoke instead of the bright light they used to be visually represented in the Kirpke era.
- Reapers also seem to be possessing people while roaming the Earth
Unsupported by anything in canon aside from, again, artistic/stylistic visual choices of the new showrunner that started the questionable retcon.
The scenario you mentioned in I'm No Angel doesn't or shouldn't even count because that episode explicitly states that Castiel warded himself against angels, and they specifically had to resort to reapers in order to find Castiel. What does that say about reapers' relationship with angels? Why would reapers suddenly be exempt from this rule if they are angels? If it's just "regular" angels that are warded against Cas, why not hire Cupids? Rit Zien?
- And don't forget, all classes of angels are referred collectively as an angel
I am aware of this. Which is exactly why I find it ridiculous that when it comes to reapers, somehow they are exempt from a lot of things if that's the case?
All angels require vessels. And we mean all kinds of angels, but yeah, not reapers--they can just change forms until we suddenly decide to depict them "wearing" vessels so we can work with our retcon.
All angels serve Heaven--oh yeah, except reapers, they're neutral.
All angels were warded against Castiel, or that building Alastair was in--except, you know, reapers. They can find Castiel or enter the building specifically warded against angels somehow.
So many angels died to save Castiel from Purgatory--but no, reapers can enter Purgatory safely by their own accord.
Why did Alastair and Lilith claim not to know how to kill angels (in the collective sense, as you yourself earlier said), but had no problems trapping and killing reapers?
To this date, I am yet to read really convincing proof that covers so many bases about reapers being angels. Sorry, not to be rude at all, but I'll pass on the arguments you posted. FTWinchester (talk) 00:54, August 23, 2016 (UTC)
Done. Also, you might consider asking for Rollback or content moderator rights. I'm also scouting Discussion Mods, your a candidate. If you want Discussion Mod rights, I can give those to you. Zane T 69 (talk) 15:35, September 2, 2016 (UTC)
Well, the powers of the various user access levels are here. If you'll list your concerns about the wiki, for when season 12 comes out. I'll do my best to address, or ease those concerns.Zane T 69 (talk) 15:50, September 2, 2016 (UTC)
I'm usually refreshing my computer ever 5-30 minutes while looking at recent changes, I'll strive to refresh more when Season 12 airs. Putting false information has been punished with infinite bans before, so if they do that, It'll probably be the first, and last time. I wont have them removing essential information from articles. I hope this helps ease your concerns. Zane T 69 (talk) 16:01, September 2, 2016 (UTC)
Hi,Kajune- i was just wondering why you edited "and other angels" out of Castiel's handprint? I believe Cas told Dean that several angels died in the effort to rescue him, no?Reka12452 (talk) 17:39, September 7, 2016 (UTC)
The point of that sentence was to acknowledge that other angels where there at the event of the rescue. they obviously all didn't leave handprints on him. but i will leave it, as u wish.Reka12452 (talk) 18:01, September 7, 2016 (UTC)\
hi, again-can you please share with me where the name Lizzie came from (and Tom, too, for that matter)?? i'd really like to know. Why not 'Psycho Nell if it's just an arbitrary choice; at least Dean actually called her that. that page has been on this wikia much longer than i 've been around, and the name Lizzie has not been mentioned here before today, as far as i could find.Reka12452 (talk) 12:47, September 9, 2016 (UTC)
Oh, i know that's what IMdb says, but who put it there? i have personally requested and gotten changes of incorrect information on IMdb for SPN and other shows, too. Of course its not as collaborative as a wikia, but they partly depend on submissions, too.Reka12452 (talk) 13:17, September 9, 2016 (UTC)
Oh - about Rebecca not being a minor character ...? she's a major part of the episode with a name, a face, a diary and two murderous kids; that doesn't qualify?Reka12452 (talk) 13:28, September 9, 2016 (UTC)
Hey Kajune, I think we don't need an alternate Dean page. As I know, the original page contains information about that one, if not we can create a heading about Future Dean in the original page. SeraphLucifer (talk) 19:14, September 12, 2016 (UTC)SeraphLucifer
Well, you're right that Dean's page contains huge data but when I edit and save, it's as fast as other pages. How fast is it on your pc? SeraphLucifer (talk) 21:03, September 13, 2016 (UTC)SeraphLucifer
Hey Kajune, hope your doing fine. Me and Zane discussed some stuff and the wiki has an empty position for Discussion Moderators. Would you like to be one? SeraphLucifer (talk) 19:30, October 4, 2016 (UTC)SeraphLucifer
Are you interested? If your worried about not knowing how to do the job, I've written a help guide, and I'm willing to personally teach you what I do know. Zane T 69 (talk) 01:21, October 7, 2016 (UTC)
I've been offered a couple of positions on the wikia and I must admit, I'm flattered, but also, I am unwilling to accept any because I am not on the wikia that often, and I also got my hands full with other responsibilites. Thank you for all your considerations. I'll probably stay a part of the Supernatural wikia until the show ends, or maybe before then. For now, I'll be doing updates and fixes for various pages, for the sake of enabling others to learn from this wikia. Thank you again. Kajune (talk) 16:17, October 22, 2016 (UTC)
Yes, Lucifer is weak, but I honestly don't think we need to point that out really. Back when he was using someone else's grace, did Castiel have that mentioned in his status? Kajune (talk) 10:44, October 29, 2016 (UTC)
Sorry about the category deletions. I do want you to know, that your work is noticed and appreciated. I know, I don't exactly say that a lot. I'm usually working on a real life project or undertaking quick projects here. Zane T 69 (talk) 19:49, December 17, 2016 (UTC)
Chill dude we are not arguing. I don't really know who portrayed Tommy's girl but other sources listed Emma Johnson as Lucifer. Spear sisters will be portraying twins in the show as I know...
I was trying to start a discussion thread. I was given instructions by Zane but I misunderstood. I tried to delete the forum, but I couldn't figure out how. Sorry for any confusion.Rafe Adler (talk) 14:55, November 11, 2016 (UTC)
I checked lots of transcripts and the ones in "Common Monsters" are actually appears to be Eve's descendants. Not sure about Nachzehrer but its been mentioned that he is related to Vampires and Ghouls. The creatures part contains the ones who aren't confirmed to be Eve's descendants.We can change the category names if you desire. SeraphLucifer (talk) 10:24, December 3, 2016 (UTC)SeraphLucifer
Normally Kajune I would agree. But as an entire category shows favoritism to "these" crossovers. Supernatural per episode has crossover comments like using something like the last episode LOTUS. There are many both in and outside universe comment comparisons. The Hope Diamond, Rosemary Baby the movie, etc. Yes all those things can exist in the SPN universe. But aren't part of the story. Like in episode 22 season 9 Metatron makes a comment about the Death Star. Like with the discrepancy page. We could make a page per season listing all movie or other series crossovers or comments. And link the respect pages to a category like this. Metatron season 9 Crossover Comments. This way it gives ALL crossovers equality not just certain ones.[[User:Twilight Despair 5|]] ([[The God of Creation]]) (talk) 21:07, December 17, 2016 (UTC)
I never noticed I was in an edit conflict so it never went through. This comment was on the category talk page. But also had a request on a possible solution.[[User:Twilight Despair 5|]] ([[The God of Creation]]) (talk) 21:07, December 17, 2016 (UTC)
No, you don't have to. I thought you simply overlooked it and would may still have the information you were going to put into the page. I'm sorry if i seemed rude, now that I know your reasons I understand better. Zane T 69 (talk) 19:05, January 20, 2017 (UTC)
No, I didn't man. I ordered him to stop. If your willing, can you revert his edits from top of recent changes down? I'll be doing the same from the bottom up. Zane T 69 (talk) 21:35, January 24, 2017 (UTC)
Heya Kajune, good too see you around here. When I left, I know you'd keep the wiki perfect. You are a trustworthy person. Glad to have you still around here. :P SeraphLucifer (talk) 08:35, January 28, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer
Well, I had hoped to use that redirect cut some bytes off pages and make them easier to load. I suggest creating a page called Sam (Disambiguation). That would allow both of us to get what we need. Is that agreeable? Zane T 69 (talk) 19:29, February 8, 2017 (UTC)
Ruler of HellEdit
RE: Absence Edit
Pretty sure I've never edited the Fairy Tail wiki. I don't even watch the show. I'm just making small edits here and there because I'm too sick to do much else.
Are you still uninterested in rollback rights or content or discussion mod rights? I'm asking, because WG18 recent was promoted to admin, and I feel we may need even more people to police the wiki. Zane T 69 (talk) 21:37, March 6, 2017 (UTC)
Well, if it's just rollback rights your interested in, those are really easy to pick up. Basically if a user does multi-edit vandalism, you can simply click rollback and undo it all. If user does two good edits and one good one, you can just undo. Basically, Rollback is "undo" on steroids. I don't really need the help, but it would be nice to have it. I want there to be enough people keeping the wiki in good shape, because if I'm online; I'm refreshing recent changes every 10-30 minutes and checking edits. I'd just like it if other users were helping out, since you have a history of undoing "bad" edits and being an exceptional user, I decided I would offer it to you first. Zane T 69 (talk) 22:16, March 6, 2017 (UTC)
I wouldn't say it needs it, but I'd like the wiki to have more active rollback users. Some of the people I thought would make good rollbacks weren't, and most of our Discussion Mods are largely inactive. Zane T 69 (talk) 00:06, March 7, 2017 (UTC)
I'm sorry, I've tried too and I can't. You'd have to make the titles on the navboxes within the "Celestial Beings" (ex. Archangels) longer so it matches up, because "Celestial Beings" is already centered. Sorry. I'll try and find a solution to the problem soon.
Create it here: http://supernatural.wikia.com/wiki/Template:Demonsbox --- For future reference, you create a page name with Template: in front of it to place it in the template namespace. Zane T 69 (talk) 01:01, April 3, 2017 (UTC)
Oh, I'll need help, lol. Hopefully multiple people or a bot can put the infobox on the pages. I'll have to ask Blaziken if he can use his bot after Angry Hearts gets back to me. Zane T 69 (talk) 16:52, April 17, 2017 (UTC)
Hey Kaj, I saw that you put Toni Bevell as Ketch's ex-girlfriend, but I couldn't remember it. Where/when was it mentioned? (don't misunderstand that I didn't trust you, just couldn't remember) SeraphLucifer (talk) 19:31, April 7, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer
Hey, man. Do you mind leaving the Season infobox at the bottom of pages? I'm not mad or anything, I just don't want anyone to move things like that around. Zane T 69 (talk) 03:26, April 18, 2017 (UTC)
Hey Kaj, I don't know if you realized but I started to work on weaknesses sections and removed a lot of stuff. What are your opinions on this topic? SeraphLucifer (talk) 00:23, April 23, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer
Hey Kaj, I reverted your edits on Angels, sorry for that. As you know I am currently working on weaknesses stuff and I use that list, once I finish angels section, I'll revert back to your version. SeraphLucifer (talk) 12:14, April 28, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer
Constant Editing (Which you are doing super-awesome job and I love your work)Edit
Hey Kaj, I saw your message on Zane's wall: "I've left some new pages stubs due to a lack of energy, motivation, and a desire for others to try and fill in the blanks. I hope you don't mind." You know that you don't have to edit everyday, everything and we don't expect you to work like an animal. You are human, chill out partner. Get some rest. There is peace even when you aren't done. You had like 200 edits when I had 3000, you have done fascinating things for the Wiki. I hope you don't misunderstand what I am saying, I just want you to be OK and if this editing stuff is very exhausting for you, take a break. SeraphLucifer (talk) 19:41, May 5, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer
I'm personally opposed to the idea, that would be more categories to police and would be redundant/overkill. If you can get at least two more to agree then you can implement it, but, personally I'm not a fan of the idea. Zane T 69 (talk) 14:50, May 6, 2017 (UTC)
Why did you undo the edit on Jen's page? I removed that picture because it was Lucifer in the guise of Jen not actually her. The photo is a picture of her from when she was actually alive. Bkshadows (talk) 18:22, May 6, 2017 (UTC)
That's entirely up to you. IMDb is considered questionable by a few users so the page might get moved back Peiro or renamed back. It's up to you, I trust your judgement. Zane T 69 (talk) 15:02, May 16, 2017 (UTC)
Sadly, I don't have any suggestions. It would greatly expand the infobox, perhaps even too much. Maybe a disambiguation page listing all the unnamed demons, but link to the page from the Demonsbox? Zane T 69 (talk) 19:55, May 19, 2017 (UTC)
Re Families Edit
Killed by pages Edit
You've done pretty good on those pages but try to do it in alphabetical order under each heading, that's what I've done with mine. Also instead of doing a link like this angel blade, you can simply do angel blade. You only really need to do it like that if your doing something like telekinetically or something that requires you put the first part, then this thing | then the second part. If its unnecessary to do it that way, then there's really no point in doing that I've found. I also don't see the need to make repeated links under the same heading, such as repeatedly linking an angel blade or the demon-killing knife multiple times under someone's demon victim section. I do it once with the highest on the list who was killed by that weapon and then leave it be.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 07:06, May 29, 2017 (UTC)
I'm going to begin a new one entitled Killed by the Knights of Hell. We don't really have enough kills by Abaddon and Cain to justify giving them separate pages so I'm gonna do the same thing you did with the Princes of Hell kills.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 19:20, May 29, 2017 (UTC)
That is an issue that needs resolving. Perhaps we could make sure the Billy page mentions he was also called Bill and contains the same information, and delete the Bill page. Zane T 69 (talk) 15:58, May 31, 2017 (UTC)
Also, I forgot to ask. Is the Demonsbox completed? If it is, we can vote on it once the current matter (this) passes or gets voted down. Your opinion on that matter would be appreciated, also. Only two people have voted. Zane T 69 (talk) 16:08, May 31, 2017 (UTC)
Killed By Edit
Yes, I suppose, they are affiliated with each other via a relationship. It wouldn't apply for separated couples, those would either have to be unlisted or listed as formerly. Zane T 69 (talk) 14:12, July 21, 2017 (UTC)
Parent Tab Template thing Edit
I've seen that done elsewhere and its not something I really like all that much but given the number of seasons it might not be a bad idea. Here's something else you can add to the template though: the Killed By Pages for the characters that have them. Maybe title the tab thing Major Kills or something like that.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 05:53, July 24, 2017 (UTC)
Wait for other peoples opinions. If you want to, outright ask them for them. We can wait a week and give others a chance to comment and give their opinions. Zane T 69 (talk) 18:57, July 24, 2017 (UTC)
Re: Parent Tab TemplateEdit
I like it! It looks good except for the quotes part.. I suggest making a separate "page" for it too (if you can of course!) but yeah overall it looks clean. Touchinos (talk) 01:40, July 26, 2017 (UTC)
I approve of the creation of [[Category:Character Quotes]], but the category page needs some content too. :Category:Character Quotes|Link, it'll take you to page creation on it. Zane T 69 (talk) 19:49, July 26, 2017 (UTC)
I think wikia did, I've noticed it on other wikis and I hate it. I'll unlock the Castiel page for you, I didn't even know it was locked for users of your maturity or experience. Zane T 69 (talk) 20:23, July 26, 2017 (UTC)
Yeah, we really need a spoiler policy and I need to find the time to write one. That would prevent the posting of possible spoilers on page and punish users who post such things. Zane T 69 (talk) 20:36, July 26, 2017 (UTC)
They all look great, and this is long overdue. I've been following your work while you were doing that and those pages are a major improvement from there previous condition. Zane T 69 (talk) 21:38, July 26, 2017 (UTC)
It's okay if i put the sub-species of the creatures in Supernatural page? Example: Demons: Princes of hell, knights of hell, etc; Angels: archangels, seraphim, etc; Ghosts: Poltergeists, Buruburu, etc; Humans: Psychics, Special Children, etc? Doctor49 (talk) 04:39, July 28, 2017 (UTC)
Hey Kaj, hope you are doing well... You left a message on my wall like about a month I guess, what was that about? Could you explain me, thanks. SeraphLucifer (talk) 21:31, August 30, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer
Yes, there is. Sadly, I haven't had time to do any real work. I've been doing work around my home and writing when I can. Sorry if it seems like I'm getting lazy, but I am checking the wiki frequently and have delegated some work. Zane T 69 (talk) 16:15, September 28, 2017 (UTC)
Good to have you back palEdit
Michael & BobbyEdit
Hey, why do you keep adding the stuff I removed? Those are unnecessary information and they have their own pages so I don't know what's the point of adding them in? Touchinos (talk) 08:06, October 4, 2017 (UTC)
Demonic Binding Link imageEdit
I googled it, and this is the best image i could find, but i have no idea how to upload images for pages. Can you upload it? https://qph.ec.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-2a0bc03208d5106878ca7d0bb6c4a597-c The Inner Hate (talk) October 12, 2017 3:03 AM (UTC)
Another image. http://www.supernaturalwiki.com/images/a/af/Bindingbrand.jpg
Conrad page Edit
Don't put fan speculation about the angel blade used to kill Zachariah on the Conrad page. Plus, that's obviously wrong: both Dean and Sam were armed with angel blades in that scene. Cas got them from Adam's Angel Escort after killing them. When Cas arrived at Bobby's, he put the blades down on Bobby's desk when explaining that Adam was back because of angels.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 20:34, October 14, 2017 (UTC)
How's it goingEdit
New staff nominations.Edit
The debate on what goes on the monster page has been reopened. Your opinion on the issue would be welcome. you can find the link here Talk:Monster#Monsters_omitted_part_2 Thank you--ThomasNealy (talk) 22:50, January 19, 2018 (UTC)
New Policy DiscussionEdit
Why the FBI should have a pageEdit
I loved your work on the US Secret Service page. I think it is a great page. I have another suggestion for a law enforcement page. I think you should totally make a page for the FBI. They have appeared a lot of times of the show, most Agent Henriksen. They played a big part in some episodes. I think it is a great idea. I think you would do an amzing job just like the USSS page.
I havent edited the wiki since last week, and I came back today only to see Ive been blocked. Whats going on?? This is User:Chayne Doss but it wont let me leave a msg because blocked(220.127.116.11 15:56, February 11, 2019 (UTC))