Hi, welcome to Supernatural Wiki! Thanks for your edit to the Telekinesis page.
Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help you with anything!
Also note that we are in the process of converting articles written in the present tense to the past tense. So you are welcome to edit any such article you come across. Once again, Welcome! WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 05:24, January 1, 2018 (UTC)
The other 6 accounts that all share the same names and post history. I realize that that message is rude but frankly I'm out of kindness and understanding for the day. and if this account is a sock of SJB then I really am not sorry.--ThomasNealy (talk) 05:37, January 1, 2018 (UTC)
Adam344 Supernaturalfan7 Stevenbritton23 Joseph3519 Steven Britton Sjb6759
I don’t know what he or she has done but I can assure you I’m not them.
inserting false info
Please stop trying to insert false info in to the telekinetic ability page. In Lucifer Rising it was revealed that it is a natural ability. This is the second time you have done this. please stop. --ThomasNealy (talk) 03:15, February 1, 2018 (UTC)
If you edit by source mode, you can see the way the links are set out. Instead of long links, they are commonly written as Angels or Demons, etc. Hope that helps. Dtol (talk) 11:24, February 4, 2018 (UTC)
Just wanted to say that while I'm not totally sure, I think I set it so that only registered users can edit on here now. I'm relatively new at this whole Admin thing and am still figuring out parts of it. Hopefully I got that one right.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 05:29, February 7, 2018 (UTC)
it is nothing personal. but the message said the attacker was blocked for multiple accounts. and you share an unforchent amount similarities with the guy. Same name pattern, same edit patern (early in your history), and same favorite wikis. the stevie wiki. --ThomasNealy (talk) 06:14, February 7, 2018 (UTC)
I’m not those users. If I was whoever you are talking about explain how I’m not Blocked I’m not those people of you do it again I will report you. Hoping you are well. Spnfan079 (talk) 06:20, February 7, 2018 (UTC)
Fun fact: I'm an Admin and I don't know whether or not you are this person but I think all of what happened tonight needs to be looked at very closely. I tend to side with Thomas fyi and given what I saw on the Admin Noticeboard, Zane at least seems to suspect you from that previous time. All too coincidental if you ask me. You becoming a suspect both times something like this has happened.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 06:56, February 7, 2018 (UTC)
Excuse me, I don't mean to disturb you or bother you but I wanted to say that I needed to finish the plot of Devil's bargain as I edit the plot days ago but couldn't finish it. I'm sorry that I had to undo your edit and ignored your advice but I had to complete it since it was bothering me. I promise not to cause you more trouble like this again.(Kingdevo215 (talk) 09:09, February 12, 2018 (UTC))
forgot to sign
I would but that's just normal grace extraction since his grace is not like others. I don't see how they could cut his neck and get it. but I'm not sure on that ritual. It really is a grey area. maybe clarify it as a theory based on the ritual but unsure if it can be taken in a normal way. ( would have thought we would have to talk about stealing grace in a normal way. the show has gotten so weird.) if someone has an issue with it we can always take it to the talk page. You would have my support for it. --ThomasNealy (talk) 05:29, March 1, 2018 (UTC)
A Most Holy Man Proof
You're supposed to add these to the articles as references, or at least put them in your edit summaries. Nobody's gonna think "Well, he must've put it on his talk page" and come check this out. Also, why do you capitalize random words in your summaries? It just looks weird.
I just thought that since he could cause a Prince of Hell pain while bound by the Cage's extremely heavy warding with telepathy and that he could reach from the Cage to Earth while bound, that merited as Highly Advanced, but I don't mind either way. Dtol (talk) 23:56, March 9, 2018 (UTC)
I'd suggest asking Zane about that. I don't really know how to do that or if there's some rule attached to it I should follow. But I do think it should be closed. Frankly beyond that spell being used to track down Jack, I don't see how its a weakness. That just seemed kind of ridiculous. Which user came up with that one again??? Cause I got a guy on here who seems to be adding some rather nonsensical things or at least don't make sense to be added and left me a rather rude message on my talk page when I called him out on it. Wonder if its the same guy???--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 02:42, March 11, 2018 (UTC)
So not the same guy then. But there really is someone on here doing stupid things like I said. Just look at my talk page before your messages. He was linking something with the Bible (I think from Abandon All Hope...) to Bobby's Panic Room which as I said makes no sense and then getting pissy when I called him on it!!! If your gonna do something like that, at least make sure the link is right!!!--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 07:36, March 11, 2018 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for providing the photos, but could you please rename them so that they fit the style of photo naming on the wikia? E.g. ScoobyNatural 01.jpg/png, etc Dtol (talk) 00:12, March 20, 2018 (UTC)
Not sure what the problem with the undo button is, but find the preferred version on the pages history, click on it, edit it (you won't have to actually change anything), and then save the older unflawed version. Zane T 69 (talk) 04:48, February 3, 2019 (UTC)
- Or reply on this talk page or mine with which version is the one you want saved and I can do it. Zane T 69 (talk) 05:11, February 3, 2019 (UTC)
It's possible, but Rollback wouldn't fix that. It undoes a series of edits by one user and not a series of edits by multiple users. Editing and saving an old version is used for that. As for Rollback and privileges in general, I've withheld giving you any due to previous claims of being wikia/fandom staff and your profile claiming your occupation at Community Central. I have yet to find any evidence that you actually are and promoting you would make you a reflection upon the wiki.... If you truly are affiliated/employed by Wikia/Fandom, then please provide some online proof; i'm not asking for personal details, but I need to know that you're genuine. If not, then please remove the false claim. Zane T 69 (talk) 15:58, February 3, 2019 (UTC)
Then you are now a Rollback. This allows you to undo every edit a user made in a row, but if some are good then you will need to edit and save an older preferred version. Zane T 69 (talk) 02:07, February 4, 2019 (UTC)
- You do now. We're at war and being targeted. You are now a Content Moderator Zane T 69 (talk) 21:17, February 7, 2019 (UTC)
Hey, saw your question on Zane's talk page, so thought I'd quickly answer it while I'm here. You do not have the ability to block users as you are not an administrator. In case you were planning to ask, you can only be made an administrator if you pass an RfA - a two-week process for established users. Nonetheless, thanks for helping out with the vandalism deletion and cleanup in the past few hours. Cheers. Calebchiam Talk 04:59, February 8, 2019 (UTC)
- Hey, easy mistake to make but be careful with those rollbacks. Cheers. Calebchiam Talk 05:31, February 8, 2019 (UTC)
- Red links can stay, unless they're for nonsense pages. Zane T 69 (talk) 02:21, February 10, 2019 (UTC)
That would be preferable, but it was an honest mistake so I'll do the first six pages you changed and you can do the most recent. It was done with good intentions so I'll help. Zane T 69 (talk) 02:27, February 10, 2019 (UTC)
Hey Dominic, frankly, there is no point protecting these pages post-vandalism. There are >4000 mainspace articles on the Wiki - and all of them are possible targets for vandalism. Protecting one and not the rest therefore does not do anything, and the protection will be lifted at some point in the future because we want legitimate users (whether anonymous or logged in) to be able to edit / move these pages when the need arises. There is hence little gain to be had from protecting these pages, and it will create work for admins in the future. I recognize you are trying to help and appreciate the effort, but the protection is unnecessary. Thanks. Calebchiam Talk 05:40, February 10, 2019 (UTC)
- Hi, as you've continued to protect pages despite the above message, as seen here and here, consider this a formal warning to please stop protecting pages indiscriminately. We leave pages unprotected because our policy is to allow all editors to edit, whether anonymous or logged-in, because we do get useful edits and contributions even from anonymous users. This is why we do not enable the feature to disable anonymous editing. By setting indefinite protection for these pages indiscriminately, you are essentially steadily disabling editing privileges for anonymous and non-autoconfirmed users. Further actions of this kind will result in your Content Moderator tools being removed, and possibly a block being given. I will undo your page protections when I get the time, or you may do so yourself. Cheers. Calebchiam Talk 05:54, February 10, 2019 (UTC)
I didn't know that the comment belongs to the talk page, I used it for the first time. I was too busy with the vandal to notice that and was alone no active admins and content mods. Mgdodl (talk) 09:42, February 10, 2019 (UTC)
You'd actually need their permission or just let them add it themselves. I can't justly give you permission to do that. You're free to ask them about it and offer though. Zane T 69 (talk) 00:04, February 13, 2019 (UTC)
No it's alright, you aren't out of line; it's perfectly fine for anyone to question my decisions, and I appreciate it if people are able to tell me when I'm wrong. In this case, the user has been blocked in the past for removing content from pages and adding inappropriate tags. Most of their edits has been undone, and they were blocked on 12/02/19 for defacing articles for one week. The edits they made today seemed to me like those they made before the block, but I agree that I may have been a little too hasty. I will lift the block and give them a chance, but if their behaviour persists, I will reblock them.
The season summaries arent from a website, they are from the back of each DVD set
- I figured that it was an honest mistake on your part. You aren't in trouble and it will not effect your reputation. I just wanted to make sure that you knew about it and learn if it was intentional, accidental, or if you merely intended to finish later. Zane T 69 (talk) 20:08, March 11, 2019 (UTC)
I would ask the other admins first. Don’t want to go changing a lot of things, having for it to be undone later.[[User:Twilight Despair 5|]] ([[The God of Creation]]) (talk) 21:12, March 17, 2019 (UTC)
I updated Community Corner some and fixed the link. You should have the highest level of rights to edit blogs and articles, it being an admins blogs may have been the cause. I can't just give admin rights, even if I feel you would be a great one. I do advise you to wait a few months and keep up your good work. It has been noticed and is giving you a good history of constructive, tedious, and previously neglected edits. That would help you in an RFA. Zane T 69 (talk) 19:02, March 19, 2019 (UTC)
Deletion of 'unused' redirects
Hey, I noticed you deleted the redirect for Jack yesterday - though it was redirected to Jack (Bad Boys) at the time. Jack is a pretty common search query, for Jack Kline (Nephilim), so you should leave the redirect alone unless you are certain that no one would use it. Redirects are cheap to have and make it easier for users to search the Wiki without knowing the actual names of articles, so there's not much reason to do maintenance on that end, for the most part. Cheers. Calebchiam Talk 00:11, March 20, 2019 (UTC)
- Yeah, I went through the deletion log. Some of the deletions are fair (e.g. the numeric 6.01-type deletions), but a bunch of them do not make sense. Please review the Community Redirect article and then review your past deletions - if you're not sure what redirects are for. They are primarily for helping users in searches, less so as links in articles. Calebchiam Talk 00:41, March 20, 2019 (UTC)
Hey, bro. It looks like you deleted the file,
If you would be as so kind as to put that back, it messed up the main page.
This file is for the Title Bars in the main page otherwise they would be white, did you read the comment in the "file history" or the summary in the "about" section ? --Mgdodl (talk) 07:54, April 6, 2019 (UTC)
- I didn't know there were that many, but great work so far. Zane T 69 (talk) 00:09, April 10, 2019 (UTC)
Hey sorry to bother you, but I was wondering if you can help me add categories to pages since you are a expert in this field. The page names are on Zane's talk page. Thanks Jack3869 (talk) 21:07, April 15, 2019 (UTC)
An RFA does require consensus to get admin/sysop rights. I can't just give you admin rights. Though I will state that there are few things that you can't do as far as permissions go as a Content Mod and Discussion Mod. If you want to be an admin then you are free to start an RFA, but I will state that Touchinos has one open which is something that you might want to consider and possibly support if you trust in his judgement and feel that he's also deserving. Zane T 69 (talk) 00:24, October 25, 2019 (UTC)
Join the Discussion
Hello! I'm only dropping by to say that there is currently an active request for adminship going on here and it would be lovely if you get involved! Thanks. Touchinos (talk) 01:12, October 28, 2019 (UTC)
RE: Mass Delete
Hello, thank you for helping me. I'm gonna upload the rest of the pictures to the wiki tomorrow morning (it's 9pm here) because I still have a paper to write. Please don't do anything, I'm actually having fun doing it. Thank you again! Touchinos (talk) 13:12, November 6, 2019 (UTC)
Hi, hello, can I bother you again? I'm going to upload the pictures of LARP and the Real Girl to Man's Best Friend With Benefits. Can you please delete the existing pictures? Thanks. Touchinos (talk) 11:56, November 10, 2019 (UTC)
- I'd rather not mess with it. The crisis is averted and it would be wasted energy that I could devote to other matters. Zane T 69 (talk) 04:38, November 14, 2019 (UTC)
- Don't, it would make you look less mature, and according to an admin on another wiki that I co-manage it may be the thread based forums that get deleted because we apparently have the wiki-style forums already. If that's true then the archives will still be useful, but we need to make sure and that means not playing with infrastructure that might still be useful. I may have misunderstood the Fandom Staff guy's reply, but the only way to make sure is to wait and see. Zane T 69 (talk) 05:34, November 14, 2019 (UTC)
The Souls of Hell
Can we please create a page for the spirits from hell freed from Chuck. Finally there is a page of it in the Super Wiki. Above all, these spirits seem to be more powerful than ordinary spirits, but weaker than demons. This is because they were in hell compared to most spirits but were not fully converted to demons? Anonyme Tät (talk) 14:09, December 15, 2019 (UTC)
"The End" Timeline
I'd like to talk with you and the others admin about the timeline appeared in "The End". Zachariah brought Dean into the future, not in an alternate universe, that would have been impossible, he wasn't that strong. So it's just a timeline, not a universe. Since Dean and Sam changed the future, that possible timeline doesn't exist now. Can we specify that? Especially in "Archangels" and "Rulers" pages. Because everyone here acts like there is an actual universe where Lucifer won the Apocalypse. Thanks. Malthael Archangel of Death (talk) 12:24, December 16, 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for your approval. Tomorrow I'll start to edit the pages, like Alternate Universes, Alternate Timelines, Alternate Universe (The End) and the others. Malthael Archangel of Death (talk) 19:19, December 16, 2019 (UTC)
Ben Edlund and Eric Kripke said that it wasn't time travel but an alternate universe. The reason for that is because in the original script it was time travel but later they chaged it to an AU. Chamuel88 (talk) 19:42, December 17, 2019 (UTC)
I read that on twitter Ben Edlund said the same thing when a fan ask him about it, i don't know when it happenned but taking that and also the previous info plus DVD commentary about the episode support that it is an AU. Chamuel88 (talk) 19:54, December 17, 2019 (UTC)
That is not another Universe, it's impossible for a simple, even if powerful, angel like Zachariah to make a dimensional rift for another reality. It's just a time travel. It happened before that the writers messed up with something, like in season 8 when Crowley talked with Naomi about Babilonia and they recognized the mistake. Despite what they might have said, it's just a matter of logic. Malthael Archangel of Death (talk) 21:37, December 17, 2019 (UTC)
Then the same applies to the french mistake universe to with they compare to the end universe. The point is that they changed the script and that is all that matters.Chamuel88 (talk) 22:06, December 17, 2019 (UTC)
Balthazar wasn't an archangel and he was the one who send Sam and Dean to an AU in season 6, also don't forget how AW Michael defeated Lucifer and won the Apocalypse even when S&D didn't existed. All this it's just some of the aspects of the shows lore that is canon despite the fact that contradicts itself for some reason and we can't just pick what is true and what is not.Chamuel88 (talk) 22:19, December 17, 2019 (UTC)
You know, i find suspicious that you joined the wiki today, you made just 8 edits till now and all of them are about this topic, the exact day we started editing the pages on this wiki after years. You're not a troll, are you? Because I searched on the internet, and I didn't find anything the suggest it was an actual alternate universe, and the producers/writers confirmed that. But if you find it and you post it here, I'll guess I'm wrong, even if from a logical point of view it's an alternate timeline and not a universe. And Balthazar used a powerful spell, just like they did in season 13. Evidently the spell they used required different ingredients, the seal of Solomon, the archangel grace, and the other stuffs. Malthael Archangel of Death (talk) 22:43, December 17, 2019 (UTC)
Actually for a long time i believe that it was a parallel future/timeline and i didn't like the fact that many others insisted that it was a AU until i read sometime ago in this very wiki, the super wiki and others (don't remember were) about Eric Kripke and Ben Edlund change of script. Also, the reason i doing this is because i care, usually i don't do this for is awkward for me and i just wanted to infor you of what i read. Look if i'm wrong then that is what is important, but don't call me troll because it wasn't necessary and your right about the logic problem but that is something the show and the fans have been dealing with for a long time.Chamuel88 (talk) 23:03, December 17, 2019 (UTC)
To end this right i just thought that if the creator of the show says in his own words that it is an «Alternate Universe Model» then is true. I saw something about it on reddit to be sure and is title «Eric Kripke and Ben Enlund on the subject of time travel in supernatural» explaining part (is not complete) of what i'm saying, but i hope you understand because i like the show and this is one of my favorite wiki pages and sorry if i made a mistake sometimes my english isn't the best.Chamuel88 (talk) 23:51, December 17, 2019 (UTC)
Hi there! Writing to tell you about changes coming to FANDOM featured videos: as of the end of this December, they will be receiving some trial run experiments. This is being done to improve video quality since videos featured on a page tend to be outdated or spout all the information the user can already read on the article. The main goal will be to figure out how to complement wiki content. Because of that, you might receive a video called "The Loop" play for anonymous users, that will be meant purely to collect visitation data in vein of the Global Taxonomy method. It won't affect all users, so you might not notice. But if you want to learn more, you can go to the blog post. Let me know if you have any questions!
Hi! Hope you're doing well. I need your opinion on this please.
RE: Inactive Admins/B-Crat
- Thanks for telling me. I tried using the Nuke option and was impressed. Zane T 69 (talk) 17:19, December 29, 2019 (UTC)
I wanted to unlink 'Leah Gideon' from the redirect and create a new character page because she was a human until the Whore of Babylon killed her and assumed her form. -- Thedarkenrahl, 12:58 AM, January 1st, 2020
I'd appreciate it if you could leave your opinion on the discussion about summoning Death. -- Thedarkenrahl, 1:44 AM, January 1st, 2020
Luis 106 Lincoln
Thank you for that edit summary. You know the one that says /* Luis 106 Lincoln */ on it. Really appreciate it. I still do too. Woo hoo. By the way Happy New Year’s Day. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Luis 106 Lincoln (talk • contribs)
Luis 106 Lincoln
Thank you for that edit summary. You know the one that says /* Luis 106 Lincoln */ on it. Really appreciate it. I still do too. Woo hoo. By the way Happy New Year’s Day. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Luis 106 Lincoln (talk • contribs)
Luis 106 Lincoln
Alright, though I feel I should point out that the first instance is just nonsensical gibberish (technically not vandalism, but that user has been warned before multiple times about their terrible English), the other two are speculation (again, technically not vandalism, but it is against the rules, and I'm not in a position to issue official warnings, seeing as how I'm not an admin).
Because plurals very often involve adding letters to the end of the singular word, links can be shorter than they are, bringing the page size down slightly. Furthermore, we can avoid linking to redirects without making articles longer (thus making them easier/faster to load).
For example, take "Vessels". If I want to link the singular word, I'll either have to link to the redirect or do this: [[vessels|vessel]] (turns into vessel). On the other hand, if the article were called "Vessel" and I wanted to link the plural word, I could still link to a redirect, or I could do this: [[vessel]]s (turns into vessels), which is shorter than when the situation is reversed and avoids linking to a redirect.
When the plural requires that letters from the singular form be changed, as is the case with Werewolf/Werewolves, a redirect is impossible to avoid, but all that means is that linking to those articles will remain the same, while the rest are improved.
Furthermore, because singular forms are shorter than plural forms, linking any word will also be shorter by default.
I'm not sure where I could suggest this to all admins, so I'm hoping you can intercede on my behalf and put this forward to the rest of the admins (assuming they don't read this message by themselves).
Discussion veering wildly off-topic
- I posted there to give them notice, they have three days to add the supposed info and justify the pages existence. I feel it gives them a real chance to add evidence and then provoke debate on that evidences validity. Zane T 69 (talk) 00:05, January 22, 2020 (UTC)
RE: New Template
Hey, Dominic. Wobbuffetmax disagrees with his block and I was wondering if you'd mind reviewing his and Orion's actions as a neutral party. His deleted post on my wall. Zane T 69 (talk) 00:07, January 27, 2020 (UTC)
How I handled things
I think this was a typo on your part, but if not, how should I have handled things with Wobbuffetmax?
New Forum for a serious issue (IMO)
This is about the bloated articles and sections I've noticed a lot recently. Please give your thoughts on the subject here.
- Must be a glitch. I checked and commenting is enabled, but I can't comment either. It's rare, but I've seen this before. I just don't know how to fix it. Zane T 69 (talk) 06:25, February 21, 2020 (UTC)
- I see the comment option now. Zane T 69 (talk) 17:51, February 21, 2020 (UTC)
- I see the comment section, too.--Mgdodl (talk) 17:59, February 21, 2020 (UTC)
Thanks but i'm bored right now and doing this to "entretain" myself since it dosen't take much thought to add the category, and i think that it would take longer to make the list than just adding the categories, but thanks again ;v. Doctor49 (talk) 20:13, February 21, 2020 (UTC)
Would it be possible that you request a bot flag, if you ever have to edit something in a large scale, like the image category, because it would clutter the Recent Activity ?--Mgdodl (talk) 09:13, February 23, 2020 (UTC)
That depends on you, if you want to create one, however I'm not sure whether an admin could grant himself the flag again on the main account, after it was given by the Fandom staff.--Mgdodl (talk) 11:08, February 23, 2020 (UTC)
Excuse me can you please do something about Appy457, cause this user is making a mess of edits. I know I usually don’t come with these problems but something has to be done. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingdevo215 (talk • contribs)
- I'm not sure if the WHAM tool is working correctly either. Zane T 69 (talk) 06:06, February 26, 2020 (UTC)
- If you have any counters in mind then please feel free to implement them. This needs to stop. I disagree about the bot, edits are spammed; 7 per minute I believe. Zane T 69 (talk) 06:14, February 26, 2020 (UTC)
- I did like 6 days ago, but been busy thanks for reminding me. Dominic1743Bot (talk) 23:49, February 29, 2020 (UTC)
Discord is doable, but we would need enough people to police it; monitor it for rule breakers, block troublesome users, and cover the time zones and prevent bleed over to the wiki. So, yes, like Dom said, we need capable management for the would-be Discord and we don't have a lot of users. So it may not be viable. Zane T 69 (talk) 21:00, March 1, 2020 (UTC)
Your new Wiki Manager
I'll be taking over for SilverFlight. Just like Julia, I'm here to help out however I can. Just let me know! You can usually find me on Discord (my username is penguinstyles#9735), however, I'm happy to use whatever contact medium you prefer.
If you have any questions for me, please let me know. I'll try to respond to them as quickly as I can.
What exactly do you mean by help ling out? Bcs i have only used discord once sometime ago and don't know much about it, but i would like to participate in the discussions about SPN and the SPN wiki there. Doctor49 (talk) 23:41, March 2, 2020 (UTC)
so does your announcement mean like people without acounts with lose their progress or people without admin privileges? Lilinkin plot (talk) 22:37, March 5, 2020 (UTC)Lilinkin plot can i ba an admin pls??
can i ba an admin pls??
After careful consideration and review of our past actions, I've realized that Discord wasn't given community approval via the forums. You need to create a forum and let users decide if it will remain. You never started a discussion on implementing it; you planned out the staffing issues and created the Discord, but the community never agreed upon its implementation on the wiki. You also need to find a way for users to view discussions held on Discord on-wiki to help maintain transparency and the integrity of consensus. This represents a personal failing for myself; such an important discussion getting forgotten, and such an important requirement shouldn't have been forgotten by someone who aspires for Bureaucrat user rights. Zane T 69 (talk) 21:21, March 6, 2020 (UTC)
If you'll close your RfB and wait until a year has passed since your promotion to Admin then we can end this toxic issue. When that time comes I'll help you do it right and support your RfB if Caleb is on-hand to be the neutral bureaucrat to handle the closing. You were made an admin about four months ago.
I realize that this might still seem harsh, but you did still make a mistake. I was hard on you because we have to set an example for the future bureaucrats of this wiki and other users. People follow our example and I was very harsh in trying to make sure that you and everyone knew that wasn't acceptable. I'll admit that I wanted to make an example of you to discourage anyone else from emulating you. Mistakes were made on both sides and I'm sorry for my vehemence in pursuing a disproportionately great punishment for you. Zane T 69 (talk) 05:31, March 7, 2020 (UTC)
I am aware, but I was told that it was the thread based forums and not the wiki-style forums. Suppose to be the forums that are like message walls that are being retired. You can ask Corey to confirm it if you want. Zane T 69 (talk) 17:02, March 7, 2020 (UTC)
Reference of Sam's Demon Blood addiction in Atomic Monsters
RE: Possible Bug
Hey, yeah this looks like a bug. Give it a couple of days to appear on Special:Analytics. If it's still saying 0 pageviews I'll file a ticket.
Re: Recent blogs purge
That page has been purged.
My name is Mandy and I'm a Community Manager for the Fandom Movies/TV Vertical. I see you've messaged me on Discord, but Discord seems to be experiencing some server outages at the moment, so I'm unable to reply there. I just wanted to swing by to introduce myself and see if you need anything, have any problems, or would like to share any ideas you have.
I will be here, alongside our Wiki Manager Cörey, to help you solve any issues on this wiki and to make this community thrive. We will be planning and executing a battle plan to help the wiki become even more successful during the much anticipated final episodes. I will be getting in touch with you and the other admins about this plan as soon as it's finished, and we will be able to discuss further. I hope you are just as excited as I am!
In the meantime, if you need anything, feel free to contact me or our Wiki Manager directly at any time. And just so you know, Wiki Managers might be more available than me on weekends.
Hello! I just finished converting the page Sam's Relationships to past tense and I noticed that there wasn't anything there about Sam's relationship with Jack, nor is there any dedicated page. Given the significance of their relationship, I suppose it would need its own page, but I don't feel able to create it myself, so I just wanted to point that out.
AnitaSalim, revisionism and bloating
This user has regularly inflated page sizes by being overly verbose without adding anything of substance (see here and here) as well as revising what are established facts, presumably to fit with their headcanon (see here, here, and here). The first thing makes articles worse, not better, since they become harder to read and correct, and the second thing is just plain old fan fiction.
I'm not sure if they're the one. I'll start shortening articles when I have some free time.
Apparently, you don't understand how the usage of the word "to" differs from the usage of the word "on". In this case, I replaced the word "on" with "to" because it makes grammatical sense. Even the reference uses the word "to". The word "the" is also redundant. Simply saying/writing "when filming will end" also makes grammatical sense.