Welcome[edit source]

Hi, welcome to Supernatural Wiki! Thanks for your edit to the Lucifer page.

Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! -- Thesilentpoethosea (Talk) 13:56, October 8, 2012

Anonymous user are allowed to contribute - just like you and me. It really doesn't matter on Wiki if you're registered or not, Wiki contributors possess the same editing capability as 'Signed-in' ones, but it sure does make it easier for us to tell who's editing, but in the big scheme of things, it's not a requirement. -- ImperiexSeed, 1:15 PM, November 3rd 2012

Ok, you're being ridiculous. I asked for opinions, but you have not right to be rude. Normally, people reply, but no, you just commented and was like, "I'm off". I didn't do anything to you and yet you make a comment like that. You don't have the right to be snarky. -- ImperiexSeed, 6:28 PM, November 3rd 2012

Re:Supernatural Wiki: Head Leader, The Big Cheese, The Big Boss, The Alpha Dog, Numero Uno, etc.[edit source]

Hey. I'm not necessarily the 'head leader' or anything of the sort, the opinions of other users do matter. That being said, I am trusted to enforce the policies on the Wiki and take action as necessary. As for editing, it's meant to be really simple so that anyone can edit. Not many guidelines, just include canon info on what happens in the show. Fanfic culture can be mentioned, but only in trivia sections. As for admins biting your head off, well, no one owns any of the articles on the Wiki, this is a collaborative project, so you can come to me if anyone starts raging at you for changing their edits. I've already warned Imperiex in the past about such behaviour so it shouldn't come up, I hope. Cheers. Calebchiam Talk 01:51, November 3, 2012 (UTC)

Re: Consquence[edit source]

There is no need to warn me as I have been editing on this wiki since at least Supernatural's fifth season, so I am fully aware that ImperiexSeed's methods as admin are often questionable . I have butt heads with him before and he has never needed a reason to ban me as I have always remained calm and polite, even when he can be harshful towards me. 20:00, November 3, 2012 (UTC)

I know "harsh" is an understatement, but I do not want to get on ImperiexSeed's bad side by in turn being too harsh on him myself. Also, I mean he never needed a valid reason that would allow him to ban me without being overuled by Calebchiam or someone else higher up. 22:07, November 3, 2012 (UTC)

What I mean is simply having somwhat constructive agruments and occasionial edit wars (as long as they do not go too far) is not something too severe I can be banned for. Yes, ImperiexSeed can indeed be far from harsh, but I have always kept my cool, never personally/malicously offending him nor being disrespectful (e.g. vandalism) to the wiki itself. 22:26, November 3, 2012 (UTC)

I kindly sugggest you cease attempting to provoke me as I will not be fazed by your bullying. In addition, Calebchiam will likely take it into account when contemplating on our dispute, which may not bode well for you. 23:24, November 3, 2012 (UTC)

No, you took what I said out of context, I was in no way threatening you. I meant it may not bode well for you because Calebchiam could decide to ban you for attempting to provoke me. 23:44, November 3, 2012 (UTC)

I am wiilling to accept your compromise, Consus. But please don't give up at least until Calebchiam has given his thoughts on our dispute. Otherwise all the frustation we both went through to argue our cases would ultimately be for nothing. 01:10, November 4, 2012 (UTC)

Suit yourself, but I still intend to see what Calebchiam's verdict is just to set my mind at ease. 01:53, November 4, 2012 (UTC)

Just an FYI, I've responded to both your comments on my talkpage. Cheers, Calebchiam Talk 07:45, November 4, 2012 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.