Supernatural Wiki

The Winchesters season 1 is currently streaming on The CW and HBO Max.

READ MORE

Supernatural Wiki
Advertisement
Supernatural Wiki

Pic

Should we change the GIF with a photo? It is really dark and FPS doesn't look good. SeraphLucifer (talk) 13:23, November 3, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

The scene was really dark so I doubt a photo would change much. Of course my opinion might change depending on the photo. FTWinchester (talk) 23:26, November 3, 2017 (UTC)

  • I think its best to just go with a picture of him imitating Cas.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 00:07, November 4, 2017 (UTC)
  • What about a gif of his "true" liquid-like form awakening and a photo of him imitating Castiel? Like the Archangels page with one photo of each archangel Doctor49 (talk) 04:34, November 4, 2017 (UTC)

I agree with Doctor49, that's how it is on the Leviathan page too. 70.93.90.147 04:41, November 4, 2017 (UTC)

I also agree. Zane T 69 (talk) 04:45, November 4, 2017 (UTC)

Here is an image from DE wiki, I think it is great. I'll put his Castiel form in powers & abilities section. SeraphLucifer (talk) 08:14, November 4, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

What do you think of the new picture? SeraphLucifer (talk) 18:37, November 5, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Looks great, but how are we suppose to categorize images of the Cosmic Entity? It doesn't quite merit a category of it's own. Zane T 69 (talk) 19:38, November 5, 2017 (UTC)

Age of the Entity

I wanted to discuss this topic, we learned that the Empty pre-dates God and Darkness but can we assume the same thing for the Cosmic Being? SeraphLucifer (talk) 22:48, November 5, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Not without more information we can't. Hopefully we will get more info to fully flesh out the character. Zane T 69 (talk) 23:01, November 5, 2017 (UTC)

So we have to change it like "The Cosmic Entity is a mysterious being who rules the Empty, a place which predates God and Amara" right? SeraphLucifer (talk) 23:04, November 5, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

That's probably for best, yes. Zane T 69 (talk) 22:13, November 6, 2017 (UTC)

in the new Ep ep 6 Cas called it anctient.  Does this change any ones thooughts on its age?  after all if Cas who was old enough to watch the first thing crawl out of the sea is calling somthing anctient that has to add some weight to the age argument.  (the sea thing was mentioned in "a man who would be king") also the entity told cas that no one in the history of forever woke up in the empty as well, that could point to him being older the the history of forever. 

ThomasNealy (talk) 11:00, November 17, 2017 (UTC)

Nigh Omnipotence

We don't know if the Cosmic Entity is nigh-omnipotent, in fact, we only have little indication for this statement. Being able to "[pull] strings" does not equate to nigh-omnipotence. Crowley was also able to pull strings in hell and yet nobody would consider him to be almost all-powerful. He simply sent an angel back to the universe (And seemingly rebuild his body to an unknown degree, granted). --77.178.73.167 18:12, November 7, 2017 (UTC)

It also implied that anyone who wanted to do anything within the Empty and its inhabitants would have to strike a deal with it first, indicating that it has complete control over the realm.

Orion (T-B-C) 20:09, November 7, 2017 (UTC)

How he talks

Say listen, I know this is probably a minor detail, but listening to him, even though he was played by Misha, the Cosmic Entity talks and sounds a little like Leonard Snart from CW's The Flash.

(Gojira2018 (talk) 06:21, November 14, 2017 (UTC))


I thought the same thing. Personally it sounded somewhere between Snart and Rumplestiltskin from Once Upon a Time. This entity talks really weird. JS0662 (talk) 21:44, November 19, 2017 (UTC)

Race

I can understand why under species it is listed as unknown. But the entity itself called itself a Cosmic Entity, as to what it is. Like how Amara is the Darkness/Nothingness and God is the Light/Being. While they are listed as a Primordials Beings, the Cosmic Entity isn’t it’s name as he said he was just a Cosmic Entity. It’s not wrong to call it the Cosmic Entity, but the entity itself called itself as a Cosmic Entity.[[User:Twilight Despair 5|]] ([[The God of Creation]]) (talk) 18:17, November 15, 2017 (UTC)

I agree with that.  also in the S13E06 Cas refered to it as a cosmic entity.  I believe the line was "I anoyed an anctient cosmic being".  This shows race or specise but not name, maybe a title. 

ThomasNealy (talk) 10:54, November 17, 2017 (UTC)

Could the entity be the Empty?

This might be me just spending to much time rewatching the part where the entity rises up as liquid.  but it looks like he is coming out of the empty like he is part of it.  it makes me wonder if the entity and the empty are one in the same.  like how in Greko-Roman myth some places were personified as an acual being.  I know there is no proof one way or anoher yet but it's an idea that just won't leave me alone. 

ThomasNealy (talk) 11:08, November 17, 2017 (UTC) ( edited the post to fix a few typos)

I was thinking the same. Like Tartarus as you said. I'd love to chat but I am sick so I'll have to rest. I'll return when I am OK. SeraphLucifer (talk) 11:14, November 17, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Older than Old

I recently updated the Primordial Entities adding Cosmic Entity as one, but it has reversed by some unregistrated user. 

I know, I know: it has not been confirmed. But taking into consideration its name (Cosmic Entity), power, and the fact that is pretty much the part of the place that is so old it predates even Creation itself, I think it is pretty safe to assume that Cos is indeed primordial entity.

Also, I think that both pages should be protected. 

The Star is falling - Greet the First Dawn! 05:52, November 21, 2017 (UTC)

  • I agree with this. I still don't get why this is still a debate, to be honest. Touchinos (talk) 06:39, November 21, 2017 (UTC)


The admins overruled us, that's why. Zane said that no explicit statement of age has been given.ThomasNealy (talk) 06:53, November 21, 2017 (UTC)

Advertisement