Shouldn't we count this as a subset of Biokinesis? FTWinchester (talk) 16:00, December 1, 2012 (UTC)

It could be, possibly. However, typically, the term Biokinesis (hence suffix "kinesis") is more related to how beings intrinsically manipulate an organism's bodily functions, and Healing is the power to alleviate or rejuvenate bodily injuries. -- ImperiexSeed, 5:18 PM, December 1st 2012
"-kinesis" is a suffix with neutral denotation. Kind of an umbrella term like 'metabolism', which could be classified as 'anabolism' or 'catabolism', both pertaining to a specified form of metabolism, but with opposite functions. Manipulating bodily organs to facilitate healing is different from manipulating organs to cause harm only in the results. FTWinchester (talk) 00:16, December 2, 2012 (UTC)
C'mon, really? Says who....you? =/ In actuality, the word "kinesis" actually coincides at the endings of like "Telekinesis", "Electrokinesis", or "Pyrokinesis" - all associated with mentally manipulating something. -- ImperiexSeed, 7:21 PM, December 1st 2012.
Manipulating something does not equal destruction. Say you can manipulate atomic energy, it does not readily mean destruction, it could mean harnessing that potential for something positive. Even in telekinesis, it is neutral. You just manipulate an object. You don't necessarily destroy it as soon as you use telekinesis on it. FTWinchester (talk) 00:31, December 2, 2012 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.