User blog comment:Kajune/Lucifer, first son?/@comment-3045936-20160408061200/@comment-1149167-20160408065138

I'm still inclined to go with Twilight and the others. While the situation is similar to the reapers are angels argument. In this case there is too much evidence to counter Amara's quote. Especially if Kripke himself confirmed that Michael is the eldest. However this wiki also works on consensus. As I mentioned before one small comment doesnt change years of established canon. I still think this also is the case with reapers as angels, hell I still want to remove all the reapers are now angels retconned nonsense from all the articles. There is just too much evidence to counter it. An angel getting possessed by a demon..anyone? However it was decided by a vote that it should remain in the articles. In this case I think a vote would also be best to prevent yet another edit war, clearly many of us just arent convinced this is retcon. And many users will be changing this thing back in forth over the next weeks and probably all summer to the point where the pages will probably have to be locked. I think in the article, somewhere it should say. "While Lucifer has been established as Michael's younger brother. Amara referred to him as the first son implying he came first." This is fair and presents both sides of the argument.