User blog comment:ImperiexSeed/Archangels are weak, don't you agree?/@comment-79.115.71.25-20151127175454/@comment-168.169.25.92-20151201165148

How the hell, is it biased to refuse to believe something that was never confirmed.

"I will also remove any info that said a Leviathan "can" kill an Archangel as that too is bias. What isn't bias is saying Leviathans "might" be able to kill Archangels."

This is revisionist, dishonest bull$hit of the worse kind. More reprehensible than that, it is outright deliberate lying to somehow justify the fact that you've been caught being biased. You Said Leviathans can kill any angel. Now you're acting like you never said it. You said, and I quote: "I don't know. But until an interview, or an episode says so. Leviathans can block any angel's power. As its canon that Leviathans can turn off Angels powers." Now you're trying to act like you never said it and doing so would be biased.

It's outright lying.

As for "I also blocked you for a week for being rude, and making threats when I am following policies made before I was an admin, and are still enforced."

1. When did I even remotely make a threat to anybody?

2. That's not the point. I was trying to get across. You asked me a question on the thread we were arguing about at the time you blocked me, as if you were expecting a response. You knew I couldn't respond and should've (well not really because I wasn't even making threats) blocked me after you asked the question. But why do that when you're losing an argument and getting backed into a corner, when you can just block someone to make it look like they were unable to refute your argument.