User talk:Kajune

Welcome
Hi, welcome to ! Thanks for your edit to the Raphael page. Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help you with anything! Also note that we are in the process of converting articles written in the present tense to the past tense. So you are welcome to edit any such article you come across. Once again, Welcome! Calebchiam (talk) 12:08, December 6, 2015 (UTC)

I don't know. I don't think I'm even the right person to ask, to be honest. You should ask one of the admins, to name two: Twilight Despair 5 and RaghavD Gabriel456 (talk) 17:28, January 5, 2016 (UTC)

Survey
Hi Kajune, I am doing sort of a survey, I just want to learn your opinions about my edits, if you could reply I'd be grateful. SeraphLucifer (talk) 18:02, January 25, 2016 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Hi
Hey Kajune. Castiel used to be a common angel, thats why I wrote "formerly" and Seraphim is another type of species (still in celestial category yes). SeraphLucifer (talk) 14:04, April 1, 2016 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Re Category
Hey Kajune, do you mean like removing the visual image of category, if so you should edit on classic editor and delete the image, I hope it will help. SeraphLucifer (talk) 05:47, March 26, 2016 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Re Bobby
Hey Kajune, I changed Bobby's picture not because it was bad, we should add the latest version of characters. This was his last apperance so I think it would be better. SeraphLucifer (talk) 13:51, April 1, 2016 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Re Profile Pics.
Hey Kajune, I think that you are actually right, there wasn't much difference between Bobby's new and old one, only old one was better as you said. I just update them since many people visit the wikia each day and I wanted to show them the latest appearence of characters. You are free to change it, its a free wikia :). SeraphLucifer (talk) 15:20, April 6, 2016 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

RE:Coroner
Well, I'd like to be helpful but I don't know the meaning of coroner... :( SeraphLucifer (talk) 15:04, May 8, 2016 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Adminship
Hey Kajune, hope your doing fine. I think you should be an admin since we don't have active admins around here, only TD5 sometimes... I think you are honest and a trustworthy editor. If you want to be an admin, I'd support you. SeraphLucifer (talk) 17:41, May 9, 2016 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

RE: Admin nomination
To be clear, I'd only remove speculation from articles. Obviously, users are free to speculate, they just have to keep it off of articles. Unfortunately, some speculation passes for fact if it seems reasonable, which, to me, is still speculation. That's the main type I'd purge from articles.

Orion ( T - B -C) 18:20, May 9, 2016 (UTC)

Re: God heals Lucifer
I don't think it's repetitive to use one image on two pages (Lucifer and Healing). I just think it fits into the context. Feel free to add (or propose) another scene from the latest episode to the page though. Lambda1 (talk) 00:57, May 13, 2016 (UTC)

Enabling
Enabling parents are the ones who let their kids do whatever they want and fix every problem they cause (as Chuck did), thus preventing their children from learning from their mistakes.

Orion ( T - B -C) 13:05, May 16, 2016 (UTC)

I swear you're wrong. By stepping down, not interfering, God was "enabling". He stopped fixing humanity's problems once he saw it did no good. Watch the episode, seriously. Kajune (talk) 13:08, May 16, 2016 (UTC)

And I swear you're wrong. Why don't you watch the episode? He was interfering, constantly, and it did no good, because he realized all it did was enable humanity's bad behavior. He stepped down because of it.

Orion ( T - B -C) 13:11, May 16, 2016 (UTC)

I think Kajune's right. Choosing not to intervene is enabling. SeraphLucifer (talk) 13:12, May 16, 2016 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

I really don't want to keep arguing. But look up the dictionary. I also updated God's page after checking the episode. Really. Kajune (talk) 13:14, May 16, 2016 (UTC)

Look up "enabling" in regards to parenting. Really.

Orion ( T - B -C) 13:15, May 16, 2016 (UTC)

Hell, just look up grammar. "A is no longer B. It's C". Meaning, "A is not B any more. Now A is C".

Orion ( T - B -C) 13:23, May 16, 2016 (UTC)

You make absolutely no sense to me. "Enabling" equals "interfering"? I've watched the latest episode like what, six times, or more? Kajune (talk) 13:25, May 16, 2016 (UTC)

For Chuck's sake, just look up "enabling" in regards to parenting.

Orion ( T - B -C) 13:29, May 16, 2016 (UTC)

Yes well, we're talking about what Chuck himself said, and what he believed. His interfence produced no results, so he left, stepped down. Chuck, said enabling was parenting. That is how a parent should raise a child. Kajune (talk) 13:35, May 16, 2016 (UTC)

No, he said that being over involved wasn't parenting, that it (being over involved) was enabling.

Orion ( T - B -C) 13:38, May 16, 2016 (UTC)

I get why you think that, but look at the whole statement, really. "Enabling" means to give authority to someone, to give someone the power to do something. In Chuck's case, it was giving humans the authority to decide what's right and what's wrong. Chuck had previously punished humans as a way of teaching them what was right and wrong, but since doing that fixed nothing, he allowed them to decide, by stepping down himself. Since Chuck believed this yielded positive results, he saw it as (good) parenting. I swear, very little of that is speculation. Kajune (talk) 13:47, May 16, 2016 (UTC)

For the umpteenth time, look up "enabling" in the context of parenting (which was the context of the conversation). What you're saying doesn't apply, period.

Orion ( T - B -C) 13:51, May 16, 2016 (UTC)

Whatever. Like I sad, I hate arguments. This wikia has nothing to do with me anyway. I won't touch anything if it satisfies you. Kajune (talk) 14:04, May 16, 2016 (UTC)

If you're not willing to look up "enabling" in regards to parenting, then why tell me to do something similar? Or did you look it up and are just unwilling to admit you're wrong?

EDIT: I guess it doesn't really matter, in the grand scheme of things, as long as the correct information is on the article.

Orion ( T - B -C) 14:08, May 16, 2016 (UTC)

Return
I'm not feeling very well, but I've come back because this wikia looks like it needs some help following the latest episode. Kajune (talk) 15:05, May 20, 2016 (UTC)

RE: Battle in "We Happy Few"
I don't know. Truth be told, I don't really care about those articles, and I don't see the point in them either.

Orion ( T - B -C) 15:54, May 23, 2016 (UTC)

Your Opinions
Hey Kajune, what are your opinions about Reapers? Do you think that they are celestial beings? SeraphLucifer (talk) 15:15, May 26, 2016 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

I don't like that they are, but since it is fact, I can't deny it. We see Tessa in her true reaper form in season 2, and we see Alastair using Death's scythe to kill reapers in season 4. Clearly, at this point, reapers weren't celestial beings. However, from Stairway to Heaven onwards, reapers are undeniably angels. Hannah knows Tessa by name, an angel blade can kill a reaper, they glow like angels when stabbed to death, and since there has been no statement as to what a reaper is or where it came from, an angel is what they are. That's, my opinion, and why. Kajune (talk) 15:29, May 26, 2016 (UTC)

RE: Status Unknown
I'm not an admin. A question like that should be answered by an admin.

Orion ( T - B -C) 12:24, June 14, 2016 (UTC)

Well if we have deceased category, I don't think there should be a problem. It must be updated as soon as we get canon info about their status, though. FTWinchester (talk) 16:37, June 22, 2016 (UTC)

RE:Lair
Just go for it. Worst case-scenario, it gets deleted by an admin. However, keep in mind there's not much to say. It's a dark hole somewhere. We know nothing about it.

Orion ( T - B -C) 16:40, June 23, 2016 (UTC)

Hey, I was wondering if you would weigh in on my RFA. I need more support, or disapproval, according to, FTW. Here:Is my RFA Zane T 69 (talk) 14:49, June 26, 2016 (UTC)

Re:Adminship
Thanks a lot Kajune that means a lot. :) SeraphLucifer (talk) 09:13, June 28, 2016 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Why did you revert valid info on the Jonathan Potts article?Zane T 69 (talk) 22:52, June 29, 2016 (UTC)

Re: Categorization
Good job! Thanks for your determination to improve our categories. FTWinchester (talk) 00:38, July 9, 2016 (UTC)

Actually, you're doing a great job. That's the whole point of the wiki--for us to provide information on the canon. And we were missing a lot of info from the latest seasons--info you know have filled. See you soon! FTWinchester (talk) 15:19, July 17, 2016 (UTC)

Re:Health
Thanks a lot Kajume :). By the way you are doing a great job currently. :) SeraphLucifer (talk) 22:46, July 9, 2016 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

RE: Minor edit
Marks your edit as a minor edit. Doesn't really matter unless you're monitoring RecentChanges.

Orion ( T - B -C) 22:06, July 14, 2016 (UTC)

Coup
Hey Kajune as  I told, a military coup happened in my country, I will lose my internet connection most probably, I'd be pleased if you could tell the others my situation, I won't be here for long I guess... Cheers... SeraphLucifer (talk) 21:30, July 15, 2016 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Re:Titles
You do have a point, but most of those names weren't even used more than once. We can place them in Trivia Section I guess, what's your opinion? SeraphLucifer (talk) 16:05, July 16, 2016 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

But as I told, there are lots of unnecessary ones in the title/alias section. For Example: Ken Doll (Dean), Coward (God), Alpha Male Monkey Friend (Dean), Bratty Child (Lucifer)... These type of words are used as insults... SeraphLucifer (talk) 16:26, July 16, 2016 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Wiki Navigation
I updated the Wiki Navigation, do you like it? Do you have any suggestions? SeraphLucifer (talk) 16:34, July 16, 2016 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

I'm sorry if my comment seemed rude. I'm just trying to keep the focus completely on the task at hand. Zane T 69 (talk) 19:37, July 16, 2016 (UTC)

Hey, Caleb finally got back to me. If you want to be a rollback, feel free to request those rights from him. When I thought of potential rollback users, you were the first name that came to mind. Zane T 69 (talk) 16:48, August 5, 2016 (UTC)

Don't know if you saw the message, but if you are interested the wiki still needs rollbacks. You can ask Caleb if you want.Zane T 69 (talk) 15:11, August 12, 2016 (UTC)

Re:Reapers are Angels
Thanks Kajune for participating this topic. I'd be grateful if you post that on FTW's wall either. We should judge everything then decide. As I said, I am currently uncertain applying this changes since there are still holes. Also I'd like to add a few things about what you wrote:

First of all, it was Tessa's true form. Tessa herself admit that:

"You didn't give me much choice. You saw my true form and you flipped out".

Also I don't think Tessa owned a vessel. She and Dean both agreed that she can appear however a Reaper wanted to.

Reapers being able to use "angel radio" is completely wrong or plot hole. Maurice, did not know who Castiel is. He had no clue about Castiel. In Season 6, every single angel knew or learned who Castiel is. Reapers maybe weren't sided with Castiel or Raphael since Reapers aren't a part of Heaven, Hell nor Purgatory but if they could use the radio, Maurice could contact with Bart without a meeting and did not need more information about him. Besides that, there is no single indication that Reapers could the angel radio. Also I don't remember that scene.

Billie teleported in 11x17 when Dean had a fatal shock (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J8aoSb14cwM). You are right that angels call themselves angel no matter what their class are. But I guess that was like the conversation between Bart and Maurice. Your kind, my kind of thing.

By the way, every single angel lost their wings no matter they were on Earth or Heaven. Grigori's case is still a secret. They might be healed by soul feeding, it is unclear. Also I'd like to mention that angels' wings aren't healed yet, they can appear at anywhere when they descend from Heaven just as in 11x02 and 11x09. They didn't teleport but arrived.

For last, you are totally right about angels not roaming Earth for 2000 years. It is one of Castiel's wrong statements.

Thanks for participating this topic once again, and great points. SeraphLucifer (talk) 15:52, August 14, 2016 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Well, leaving a corpse is quite confusing, however they might actually formed a physical form. Like horsemen. It is unclear anyways just a prediction.

Most creatures have telepathic links, Reapers may have that too but there is no indications that they could use angel radio. Also Maurice's lack of knowledge about Castiel definetly proves that they weren't able to use angel radio. Even in that episode Bart stated;  your kind, my kind thing. Don't get me wrong by the way, not trying to be offensive :D.

Well about wings we have a certain statement. Lower angels completely lost their wings as in 8x23, however stronger/higher angels kept their wings just like Gadreel and Cas (When he regained his grace). Lucifer, far stronger than Cas and he was unaffected by the spell. Spells affect depends on angels strenght apparently. We know that spell also affected the angels on Earth, but the ones who fell from Heaven, was physically weakened compared to them. Some even died.

Anyways, I do hate this topic because of episode 9x22. Hope we can do the right thing. SeraphLucifer (talk) 15:17, August 15, 2016 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Thanks for participating. I'd like to point out that most of your points appear to have been fitted to work with the retcon, when in face value upon introduction, those exact same points were used to delineate reapers from angels. There are too many discrepancies for the retcon to work. But for the sake of discussion, I'll parse the points you raised.


 * There are the other classes of angels who resided on Earth during this time too, as part of their duty.

True. It could retroactively be made to support the claim, but it is not a strong argument about reapers being angels. Point being, I can come up with a completely random creature (say, hell cats), re-classify it as an "angel" and this argument could still support the claim despite the differences between actual angels and "hell cats".


 * Tessa's true form, which Dean witnessed in season 2, was an illusion


 * What Dean saw was not a true form

Blatant disregard for what was shown visually and what was told literally by the character. Dean saw the skeletal "true" form, and in Tessa's words, he "flipped out". The only dead reaper I remember in Kirpke's era was in Death Takes A Holiday, and it occurred when Sam and Dean were projected into the spiritual plane, hence them being able to see reapers without any further aid. Had they been manifesting in natural, physical human form AND seen the reaper corpse, then I would agree with this. Anything that came after Kirpke, of course, would support this, because the new era started this notion that reapers are angels. So visually, April Kelly's death leaving a corpse is about as canon as angels suddenly becoming white smoke instead of the bright light they used to be visually represented in the Kirpke era.


 * Reapers also seem to be possessing people while roaming the Earth

Unsupported by anything in canon aside from, again, artistic/stylistic visual choices of the new showrunner that started the questionable retcon.

The scenario you mentioned in I'm No Angel doesn't or shouldn't even count because that episode explicitly states that Castiel warded himself against angels, and they specifically had to resort to reapers in order to find Castiel. What does that say about reapers' relationship with angels? Why would reapers suddenly be exempt from this rule if they are angels? If it's just "regular" angels that are warded against Cas, why not hire Cupids? Rit Zien?


 * And don't forget, all classes of angels are referred collectively as an angel

I am aware of this. Which is exactly why I find it ridiculous that when it comes to reapers, somehow they are exempt from a lot of things if that's the case?

All angels require vessels. And we mean all kinds of angels, but yeah, not reapers--they can just change forms until we suddenly decide to depict them "wearing" vessels so we can work with our retcon.

All angels serve Heaven --oh yeah, except reapers, they're neutral.

All angels were warded against Castiel, or that building Alastair was in --except, you know, reapers. They can find Castiel or enter the building specifically warded against angels somehow.

So many angels died to save Castiel from Purgatory --but no, reapers can enter Purgatory safely by their own accord.

Why did Alastair and Lilith claim not to know how to kill angels (in the collective sense, as you yourself earlier said), but had no problems trapping and killing reapers?

To this date, I am yet to read really convincing proof that covers so many bases about reapers being angels. Sorry, not to be rude at all, but I'll pass on the arguments you posted. FTWinchester (talk) 00:54, August 23, 2016 (UTC)

Re:Addict
If you ask me, you are doing one hell of a job. Keep going as long as you do pages about shows. :) SeraphLucifer (talk) 15:15, August 27, 2016 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

I approve of your contributions, I want this to be the dominant resource. If it can be, of course. Zane T 69 (talk) 20:42, September 1, 2016 (UTC)

The page renaming didn't end well. Do you want me to undo that? Zane T 69 (talk) 15:16, September 2, 2016 (UTC)

Done. Also, you might consider asking for Rollback or content moderator rights. I'm also scouting Discussion Mods, your a candidate. If you want Discussion Mod rights, I can give those to you. Zane T 69 (talk) 15:35, September 2, 2016 (UTC)

Well, the powers of the various user access levels are here. If you'll list your concerns about the wiki, for when season 12 comes out. I'll do my best to address, or ease those concerns.Zane T 69 (talk) 15:50, September 2, 2016 (UTC)

I'm usually refreshing my computer ever 5-30 minutes while looking at recent changes, I'll strive to refresh more when Season 12 airs. Putting false information has been punished with infinite bans before, so if they do that, It'll probably be the first, and last time. I wont have them removing essential information from articles. I hope this helps ease your concerns. Zane T 69 (talk) 16:01, September 2, 2016 (UTC)

No problem. Zane T 69 (talk) 16:11, September 2, 2016 (UTC)

Editing
Hey Kajune, can you be a little more careful when adding appearances? Looks like you always forget to put the first dot. SeraphLucifer (talk) 18:57, September 2, 2016 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Hi,Kajune- i was just wondering why you edited  "and other angels"  out of Castiel's handprint? I believe  Cas told Dean that several angels died  in the effort to rescue him, no?Reka12452 (talk) 17:39, September 7, 2016 (UTC)

The point of that sentence was to acknowledge that other angels where there at the event of the rescue. they obviously all didn't leave handprints on him. but i will leave it, as u wish.Reka12452 (talk) 18:01, September 7, 2016 (UTC)\

Family Remains
Hi - looks like you have already started editing a page that i haven't even had a chance to finish creating yet ??? what gives?Reka12452 (talk) 08:53, September 9, 2016 (UTC)

hi, again-can you please share with me where the name Lizzie came from (and  Tom, too, for that matter)?? i'd really like to know. Why not 'Psycho Nell if it's just an arbitrary choice; at least Dean actually called her that. that page has been  on this wikia much longer than i 've been around, and the name Lizzie has not been mentioned here before today, as far as i could find.Reka12452 (talk) 12:47, September 9, 2016 (UTC)

Oh, i know that's what IMdb says, but who put it there? i have personally requested and gotten changes of incorrect information on IMdb for SPN and other shows, too. Of  course its not as collaborative as a wikia, but they partly depend on submissions, too.Reka12452 (talk) 13:17, September 9, 2016 (UTC)

Oh - about Rebecca not being  a minor character ...? she's a major part of the episode with a name, a face, a diary and two murderous kids; that doesn't qualify?Reka12452 (talk) 13:28, September 9, 2016 (UTC)

Re:Alternate Dean
Hey Kajune, I think we don't need an alternate Dean page. As I know, the original page contains information about that one, if not we can create a heading about Future Dean in the original page. SeraphLucifer (talk) 19:14, September 12, 2016 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Well, you're right that Dean's page contains huge data but when I edit and save, it's as fast as other pages. How fast is it on your pc? SeraphLucifer (talk) 21:03, September 13, 2016 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

I saw your message on Seraphs wall, I fixed it, or at least made it more relevant. Zane T 69 (talk) 16:20, September 20, 2016 (UTC)

Re:Community
Hey Kajune, thanks for informing us. Never realized that. Much appreciated. SeraphLucifer (talk) 16:04, September 21, 2016 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Mission Impossible
Hey Kajune, hope your doing fine. Me and Zane discussed some stuff and the wiki has an empty position for Discussion Moderators. Would you like to be one? SeraphLucifer (talk) 19:30, October 4, 2016 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Here is more information, you'll basically police blogs for spoilers, trolling/flaming and telling people to stay on topic. Zane T 69 (talk) 15:35, October 5, 2016 (UTC)

Are you interested? If your worried about not knowing how to do the job, I've written a help guide, and I'm willing to personally teach you what I do know. Zane T 69 (talk) 01:21, October 7, 2016 (UTC)

Also, I contacted a person who works with Wikia. I think he can fix the page. Zane T 69 (talk) 01:22, October 7, 2016 (UTC)

Yes, though obviously they should be unacceptable for some appropriate reason, like having spoilers, hate speech, trolling/flamming. Zane T 69 (talk) 15:07, October 7, 2016 (UTC)

Yes, that's okay. As long as they're properly categorized. Zane T 69 (talk) 15:00, October 26, 2016 (UTC)

Well done. You have been busy today. Zane T 69 (talk) 18:46, November 6, 2016 (UTC)

categories edit
hey, Kajune - do u know why the When the Levee Breaks page won't accept a categories edit? i've not seen that before.Reka12452 (talk) 18:31, October 6, 2016 (UTC)

Congratz
Jesus Kajune you had like 200 edits when I had 3000 and now you are ahead of me. Nice work mate and thanks for your contributions. :) SeraphLucifer (talk) 19:21, October 6, 2016 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

About Me
I've been offered a couple of positions on the wikia and I must admit, I'm flattered, but also, I am unwilling to accept any because I am not on the wikia that often, and I also got my hands full with other responsibilites. Thank you for all your considerations. I'll probably stay a part of the Supernatural wikia until the show ends, or maybe before then. For now, I'll be doing updates and fixes for various pages, for the sake of enabling others to learn from this wikia. Thank you again. Kajune (talk) 16:17, October 22, 2016 (UTC)

Lucifer's State
Well, Rowena told him that he will gain his full glory, meaning he was not at his best at the moment. What do you think about it? SeraphLucifer (talk) 06:52, October 29, 2016 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Yes, Lucifer is weak, but I honestly don't think we need to point that out really. Back when he was using someone else's grace, did Castiel have that mentioned in his status? Kajune (talk) 10:44, October 29, 2016 (UTC)

Can you give your opinion on this matter? Caleb wants the discussion closed by 12 November. Zane T 69 (talk) 15:44, November 7, 2016 (UTC)

Why does the Move log show you moved "Arthur Ketch" to "Larry Lee"? Zane T 69 (talk) 18:38, December 10, 2016 (UTC)

Okay. That should be okay, your recycling unused page then. Zane T 69 (talk) 18:58, December 10, 2016 (UTC)

Another user changed the Mr. Ketch Page, I'll delete that. The Larry Lee page is separate anyway. Zane T 69 (talk) 18:59, December 10, 2016 (UTC)

Can you give your opinion on this? Zane T 69 (talk) 18:37, December 17, 2016 (UTC)

Sorry about the category deletions. I do want you to know, that your work is noticed and appreciated. I know, I don't exactly say that a lot. I'm usually working on a real life project or undertaking quick projects here. Zane T 69 (talk) 19:49, December 17, 2016 (UTC)

Re:Mamma Mia
Chill dude we are not arguing. I don't really know who portrayed Tommy's girl but other sources listed Emma Johnson as Lucifer. Spear sisters will be portraying twins in the show as I know...

PS: Dat Imdb. SeraphLucifer (talk) 13:23, November 1, 2016 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Metamorphosis edit
May I ask why you removed the photo from the Metamorphosis page? Reka12452 (talk) 14:46, November 7, 2016 (UTC)


 * btw, the caption in between the two photos was meant to caption both, fyi.Reka12452 (talk)

Forum
I was trying to start a discussion thread. I was given instructions by Zane but I misunderstood. I tried to delete the forum, but I couldn't figure out how. Sorry for any confusion.Rafe Adler (talk) 14:55, November 11, 2016 (UTC)

Your Opinion
Hey Kajune, can I have your opinion on this topic? Last discussion. SeraphLucifer (talk) 15:11, November 18, 2016 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Scott Carey
hi- why the edit on the Scott Carey page, if i may ask? Reka12452 (talk) 07:09, December 1, 2016 (UTC)

Changes
Hey Kajune, hope your doing fine. What do you think about the changes on Monster page? SeraphLucifer (talk) 09:06, December 3, 2016 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Re:Changes
I checked lots of transcripts and the ones in "Common Monsters" are actually appears to be Eve's descendants. Not sure about Nachzehrer but its been mentioned that he is related to Vampires and Ghouls. The creatures part contains the ones who aren't confirmed to be Eve's descendants.We can change the category names if you desire. SeraphLucifer (talk) 10:24, December 3, 2016 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Re:Changes
Thanks... However I have to add much more info and content on the page. Also categorizing other pages etc. SeraphLucifer (talk) 10:27, December 3, 2016 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Re: Effort
Thanks for the note, Kajune! :) Reka12452 (talk) 14:35, December 15, 2016 (UTC)

Normally Kajune I would agree. But as an entire category shows favoritism to "these" crossovers. Supernatural per episode has crossover comments like using something like the last episode LOTUS. There are many both in and outside universe comment comparisons. The Hope Diamond, Rosemary Baby the movie, etc. Yes all those things can exist in the SPN universe. But aren't part of the story. Like in episode 22 season 9 Metatron makes a comment about the Death Star. Like with the discrepancy page. We could make a page per season listing all movie or other series crossovers or comments. And link the respect pages to a category like this. Metatron season 9 Crossover Comments. This way it gives ALL crossovers equality not just certain ones.&#91;&#91;User:Twilight Despair 5&#124;&#93;&#93; (&#91;&#91;The God of Creation&#93;&#93;) (talk) 21:07, December 17, 2016 (UTC)

I never noticed I was in an edit conflict so it never went through. This comment was on the category talk page. But also had a request on a possible solution.&#91;&#91;User:Twilight Despair 5&#124;&#93;&#93; (&#91;&#91;The God of Creation&#93;&#93;) (talk) 21:07, December 17, 2016 (UTC)

Lol Kajune, this is your wiki. You are like the most trustworthy user around here. Chill out, we love ya. SeraphLucifer (talk) 21:15, December 17, 2016 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Yes, it does. And you contributed quite a bit to that. I've been watching the page count. Zane T 69 (talk) 17:16, January 2, 2017 (UTC)

I think you forgot to fill in a page you created: Detective Glass has almost no content on it. Zane T 69 (talk) 18:52, January 20, 2017 (UTC)

No, you don't have to. I thought you simply overlooked it and would may still have the information you were going to put into the page. I'm sorry if i seemed rude, now that I know your reasons I understand better. Zane T 69 (talk) 19:05, January 20, 2017 (UTC)

No, I didn't man. I ordered him to stop. If your willing, can you revert his edits from top of recent changes down? I'll be doing the same from the bottom up. Zane T 69 (talk) 21:35, January 24, 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, man! I'm glad that I didn't have to clean all that up by myself, again. Zane T 69 (talk) 21:54, January 24, 2017 (UTC)

Hey
Heya Kajune, good too see you around here. When I left, I know you'd keep the wiki perfect. You are a trustworthy person. Glad to have you still around here. :P SeraphLucifer (talk) 08:35, January 28, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

That doesn't change the thing you have achieved/done here. Know that you are being appreciated... SeraphLucifer (talk) 12:47, January 28, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

I saw what you said on Seraphs wall and wanted to say, thank you. Zane T 69 (talk) 14:53, January 29, 2017 (UTC)

I checked the pages history, and the image seemed to have never actually displayed. Zane T 69 (talk) 23:40, January 31, 2017 (UTC)

Well, I had hoped to use that redirect cut some bytes off pages and make them easier to load. I suggest creating a page called Sam (Disambiguation). That would allow both of us to get what we need. Is that agreeable? Zane T 69 (talk) 19:29, February 8, 2017 (UTC)

A user recently made sections of the Sam and Dean pages collapsable, has that made it easier for you to load the pages? Zane T 69 (talk) 22:42, February 12, 2017 (UTC)

Okay, you had made a blog a while ago complaining about the loading speed, I thought. Zane T 69 (talk) 23:18, February 12, 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, man. I try, especially on the longer pages. Zane T 69 (talk) 23:35, February 12, 2017 (UTC)

Caleb informed me I needed to create a forum for an infinite ban of ImperiexSeed. If you would like too, please register your opinion here. Zane T 69 (talk) 18:24, February 17, 2017 (UTC)

Sorry, I thought you had been annoyed by him too. That's why I contracted you. Zane T 69 (talk) 19:13, February 17, 2017 (UTC)

Well, thanks for your support. Zane T 69 (talk) 19:29, February 17, 2017 (UTC)

A few years, don't remember exactly how long though. Zane T 69 (talk) 21:57, February 18, 2017 (UTC)

Rowena
Well, if you'd ask me you did a fantastic job Kaj. SeraphLucifer (talk) 05:24, February 10, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

I agree, nice work man. Zane T 69 (talk) 15:34, February 10, 2017 (UTC)

Re
Both, I think.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 01:08, February 11, 2017 (UTC)

I think it's a good idea, but you might want to get the opinions of others. Zane T 69 (talk) 01:15, February 23, 2017 (UTC)

Ruler of Hell
Real nice work man. Glad to have you here. SeraphLucifer (talk) 18:51, February 27, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

RE: Absence
Pretty sure I've never edited the Fairy Tail wiki. I don't even watch the show. I'm just making small edits here and there because I'm too sick to do much else.

Orion ( T - B -C) 09:37, March 1, 2017 (UTC)

Thank you.

Orion ( T - B -C) 10:05, March 1, 2017 (UTC)

It's good. Zane T 69 (talk) 23:31, March 1, 2017 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks buddy!!!--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 02:25, March 3, 2017 (UTC)

It's one the wikis "special pages" it's a help tool for users. Zane T 69 (talk) 02:29, March 5, 2017 (UTC)

That helped quite a bit, only 53 left. Zane T 69 (talk) 15:15, March 5, 2017 (UTC)

I think it might update everyday, but I'm not sure when. Zane T 69 (talk) 19:28, March 5, 2017 (UTC)

Great! Thanks for all the work you did! Zane T 69 (talk) 16:09, March 6, 2017 (UTC)

Are you still uninterested in rollback rights or content or discussion mod rights? I'm asking, because WG18 recent was promoted to admin, and I feel we may need even more people to police the wiki. Zane T 69 (talk) 21:37, March 6, 2017 (UTC)

Well, if it's just rollback rights your interested in, those are really easy to pick up. Basically if a user does multi-edit vandalism, you can simply click rollback and undo it all. If user does two good edits and one good one, you can just undo. Basically, Rollback is "undo" on steroids. I don't really need the help, but it would be nice to have it. I want there to be enough people keeping the wiki in good shape, because if I'm online; I'm refreshing recent changes every 10-30 minutes and checking edits. I'd just like it if other users were helping out, since you have a history of undoing "bad" edits and being an exceptional user, I decided I would offer it to you first. Zane T 69 (talk) 22:16, March 6, 2017 (UTC)

I wouldn't say it needs it, but I'd like the wiki to have more active rollback users. Some of the people I thought would make good rollbacks weren't, and most of our Discussion Mods are largely inactive. Zane T 69 (talk) 00:06, March 7, 2017 (UTC)

I tried, I couldn't make it work. Zane T 69 (talk) 00:48, March 7, 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, man! You did a lot! I'll see if I can find a solution for the rest. Zane T 69 (talk) 15:54, March 8, 2017 (UTC)

I'm doing good. How are you? Zane T 69 (talk) 03:48, March 16, 2017 (UTC)

Hey, Kajune. I wanted to thank you for doing the clean up on that unnecessary category... so, Thank you! Zane T 69 (talk) 15:00, March 27, 2017 (UTC)

Well it needs some more work, but I'll unprotect it so you can work on it. Zane T 69 (talk) 01:22, April 2, 2017 (UTC)

Of course, feel free to do so. Zane T 69 (talk) 01:56, April 2, 2017 (UTC)

Apart from the Celestial Beings part needing to be centered and needing the older template removed from the page, it looks great. Zane T 69 (talk) 02:16, April 2, 2017 (UTC)

As am I, if you did need help you could ask Angry Hearts. Anyway, I'm gonna get offline for the night. Zane T 69 (talk) 02:24, April 2, 2017 (UTC)

Re:Angelbox
I'm sorry, I've tried too and I can't. You'd have to make the titles on the  navboxes  within the "Celestial Beings" (ex. Archangels) longer so it matches up, because "Celestial Beings" is already centered. Sorry. I'll try and find a solution to the problem soon.

03:59,4/2/2017

Well, it'll have to be created from scratch. Most likely mimicking the angels or seasons infobox. Zane T 69 (talk) 00:33, April 3, 2017 (UTC)

Create it here: http://supernatural.wikia.com/wiki/Template:Demonsbox   --- For future reference, you create a page name with Template: in front of it to place it in the template namespace. Zane T 69 (talk) 01:01, April 3, 2017 (UTC)

It looks great, well done. Zane T 69 (talk) 02:30, April 3, 2017 (UTC)

It has to be approved in the forums, before being added to pages. Let's let the current matter pass or fail first. Zane T 69 (talk) 02:41, April 3, 2017 (UTC)

Those options are being considered, along with unprotecting the categories for them. Zane T 69 (talk) 02:28, April 8, 2017 (UTC)

Well, after the Seasons Infobox is fully implemented then we can vote on the Demonbox. I'm currently waiting for Angry Hearts to contact me. Zane T 69 (talk) 16:39, April 17, 2017 (UTC)

Oh, I'll need help, lol. Hopefully multiple people or a bot can put the infobox on the pages. I'll have to ask Blaziken if he can use his bot after Angry Hearts gets back to me. Zane T 69 (talk) 16:52, April 17, 2017 (UTC)

Relationship
Hey Kaj, I saw that you put Toni Bevell as Ketch's ex-girlfriend,  but I couldn't remember it. Where/when was it mentioned? (don't misunderstand that I didn't trust you, just couldn't remember) SeraphLucifer (talk) 19:31, April 7, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Thanks a lot mate, I missed that point jeez. SeraphLucifer (talk) 06:42, April 8, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

12x18
Here is a link if you want to watch mate. SeraphLucifer (talk) 08:45, April 14, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Hey, man. Do you mind leaving the Season infobox at the bottom of pages? I'm not mad or anything, I just don't want anyone to move things like that around. Zane T 69 (talk) 03:26, April 18, 2017 (UTC)

Weaknesses changes
Hey Kaj, I don't know if you realized but I started to work on weaknesses sections and removed a lot of stuff. What are your opinions on this topic? SeraphLucifer (talk) 00:23, April 23, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Alright. You know your opinions do matter for me :) SeraphLucifer (talk) 08:51, April 23, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Angel Order
Hey Kaj, I reverted your edits on Angels, sorry for that. As you know I am currently working on weaknesses stuff and I use that list, once I finish angels section, I'll revert back to your version. SeraphLucifer (talk) 12:14, April 28, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Thanks, I'll be done with angel section in a few minutes then revert back to your edition. Alphabetical order is better I agree. SeraphLucifer (talk) 12:38, April 28, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Reverted back, thanks :) SeraphLucifer (talk) 13:11, April 28, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Pics
No prob! IMO, one of the best parts of the show is discovering what new CGI effects they've come up with each week. Bkshadows (talk)

That should be fine, I thought you missed or forgot the page last time. Zane T 69 (talk) 16:54, May 4, 2017 (UTC)

Constant Editing (Which you are doing super-awesome job and I love your work)
Hey Kaj, I saw your message on Zane's wall: "I've left some new pages stubs due to a lack of energy, motivation, and a desire for others to try and fill in the blanks. I hope you don't mind." You know that you don't have to edit everyday, everything and we don't expect you to work like an animal. You are human, chill out partner. Get some rest. There is peace even when you aren't done. You had like 200 edits when I had 3000, you have done fascinating things for the Wiki. I hope you don't misunderstand what I am saying, I just want you to be OK and if this editing stuff is very exhausting for you, take a break. SeraphLucifer (talk) 19:41, May 5, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

By the way, I always call you as "Kaj" and I never even asked you, is it OK for me to call you Kaj? XD SeraphLucifer (talk) 19:48, May 5, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

I'm personally opposed to the idea, that would be more categories to police and would be redundant/overkill. If you can get at least two more to agree then you can implement it, but, personally I'm not a fan of the idea. Zane T 69 (talk) 14:50, May 6, 2017 (UTC)

I'm not sure why it was locked. It pre-dated me, but I unlocked it for you. Zane T 69 (talk) 17:56, May 6, 2017 (UTC)

No problem. Zane T 69 (talk) 18:22, May 6, 2017 (UTC)

Edit
Why did you undo the edit on Jen's page? I removed that picture because it was Lucifer in the guise of Jen not actually her. The photo is a picture of her from when she was actually alive. Bkshadows (talk) 18:22, May 6, 2017 (UTC)

Hmm I can respect that decision, that's fine. Also as the 2nd photo just illustrates her being possessed, its probably not even necessary to re-add it anywhere. Bkshadows (talk)

Re
Dude there's nowhere on this site where words like "dear friend" and "mysterious mouse" are used.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 03:45, May 12, 2017 (UTC)

Roughly how many have succeeded, and how many have attempted? Zane T 69 (talk) 14:43, May 15, 2017 (UTC)

Okay, but how many actually succeeded? And how many merely attempted? I'm trying to assess the need of the category. Zane T 69 (talk) 14:56, May 15, 2017 (UTC)

In that case, go ahead and create it. I was just concerned with categories for like four or five people. Zane T 69 (talk) 15:55, May 15, 2017 (UTC)

Okay. That should be more than enough to build a category on. Zane T 69 (talk) 16:03, May 15, 2017 (UTC)

That's entirely up to you. IMDb is considered questionable by a few users so the page might get moved back Peiro or renamed back. It's up to you, I trust your judgement. Zane T 69 (talk) 15:02, May 16, 2017 (UTC)

I'd rather you didn't, eliminating re-directs is a very long-term of mine. Zane T 69 (talk) 15:52, May 16, 2017 (UTC)

There great, well-written and essential for our wiki to become the resource for all things Supernatural. Thank you for your continued hard work. Zane T 69 (talk) 16:26, May 16, 2017 (UTC)

Polls
Updated the poles mate. Did you like them? I made a huge mistake tho. Forgot to put Rowena... SeraphLucifer (talk) 14:37, May 19, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Is the Demonsbox fully updated? I was thinking we'd go ahead and vote on it. Zane T 69 (talk) 19:25, May 19, 2017 (UTC)

Sadly, I don't have any suggestions. It would greatly expand the infobox, perhaps even too much. Maybe a disambiguation page listing all the unnamed demons, but link to the page from the Demonsbox? Zane T 69 (talk) 19:55, May 19, 2017 (UTC)

Alright, if that's what you wanna do. Zane T 69 (talk) 20:29, May 19, 2017 (UTC)

Re Families
(showman voice) Thank you, thank you. I'm here for the next five minutes before I go to bed. You've been a great audience!!!--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 06:50, May 23, 2017 (UTC)

Killed by pages
Buddy, you have no idea!!!--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 02:32, May 28, 2017 (UTC)

Re
Probably not a bad idea given Ramiel and Dagon don't really have all that much that we can name.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 23:36, May 28, 2017 (UTC)

You've done pretty good on those pages but try to do it in alphabetical order under each heading, that's what I've done with mine. Also instead of doing a link like this angel blade, you can simply do angel blade. You only really need to do it like that if your doing something like telekinetically or something that requires you put the first part, then this thing | then the second part. If its unnecessary to do it that way, then there's really no point in doing that I've found. I also don't see the need to make repeated links under the same heading, such as repeatedly linking an angel blade or the demon-killing knife multiple times under someone's demon victim section. I do it once with the highest on the list who was killed by that weapon and then leave it be.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 07:06, May 29, 2017 (UTC)

I'm going to begin a new one entitled Killed by the Knights of Hell. We don't really have enough kills by Abaddon and Cain to justify giving them separate pages so I'm gonna do the same thing you did with the Princes of Hell kills.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 19:20, May 29, 2017 (UTC)

Next up for me is Gadreel.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 23:24, May 29, 2017 (UTC)

Did you want this page deleted? Because you did blank it. Zane T 69 (talk) 15:09, May 31, 2017 (UTC)

That is an issue that needs resolving. Perhaps we could make sure the Billy page mentions he was also called Bill and contains the same information, and delete the Bill page. Zane T 69 (talk) 15:58, May 31, 2017 (UTC)

Also, I forgot to ask. Is the Demonsbox completed? If it is, we can vote on it once the current matter (this) passes or gets voted down. Your opinion on that matter would be appreciated, also. Only two people have voted. Zane T 69 (talk) 16:08, May 31, 2017 (UTC)

Well you could probably have a week or more to do it. The current matter isn't getting much attention. Zane T 69 (talk) 16:26, May 31, 2017 (UTC)

Me too usually but in those cases I was either in a hurry or couldn't come up with a good name at the time. Look at all the other ones I've named.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 22:45, May 31, 2017 (UTC)

Yeah, they seem good.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 18:15, June 1, 2017 (UTC)

I personally don't see a need for it, but if you get others on board you can go for it. Zane T 69 (talk) 14:51, June 13, 2017 (UTC)

How many groups do you have that fit the category? Zane T 69 (talk) 17:29, June 18, 2017 (UTC)

Alright, that should be enough to build a category on. Go for it. Zane T 69 (talk) 17:41, June 18, 2017 (UTC)