User blog comment:123bante123/Can it reap them ?/@comment-3481504-20141205092608/@comment-3045936-20141205181824

Your third word in your post was assumed. A variation of sepeculation even if it leads to a correct answer. That is semantics or interrupting facts or assumed facts to support one's conclusions. But everyone in creation does this to some degree.

So my point can be argued my other point is, your's can as well in the series. I ask you understand that I can be right, wrong, or in varing degrees but so can your points. That isn't being unfair or anything but unbias.

Same point if an atheist came to the wikia, and use their opinions to alter pages. You would try to get them to leave their personal ideas, opinions, beliefs at the virtual door as much as possible.