User talk:Zane T 69

 Size of the page: bytes. Archive at 50,000 bytes!  Archive One

This is not the place to report issues on the wiki. Admin Noticeboard is: Here

Molecular Combustion
After a comment by FTWinchester on my talk page I'm gonna split the Implosion page into two: Implosion (what Amara did to Metatron) and Molecular Combustion which is everything else. Cas described what was done to him as being ripped apart at the subatomic level to Claire Novak so that's a close enough title if nothing else. Sounds like Piper Halliwell from Charmed with gorier side effects anyway what Luci and Raphy did to Cas. FTW hasn't responded to my reply messages though and I wanted your opinion on a couple of the examples: one of the angels Amara killed in O Brother, Where Art Thou? looked more like what Luci did to Jofiel in Heaven than a smiting. One was definitely smitted by her and another telekinetically killed with his own angel blade but that last angel looked more like Jofiel when Luci killed him and I want to list that one. I also think we should list one of the pagan gods killed by Luci in Hammer of the Gods. At the moment, he's listed as being ripped apart by Luci's telekinesis but the effect that was shown looks more like what he did to Cas with a different hand movement than telekinesis. I want to include that one as well and I want some thoughts on that please.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 22:29, November 13, 2016 (UTC)

Actually its not a debate at all. They brought up that Implosion only really fits what Amara did to Metatron and I realized he was right, responded back that I think it might be a good idea to break it up into Implosion and Molecular Combustion, said some of the same stuff I did to you and haven't gotten a response yet. I doubt FTW will have an issue with that, unlike the other thing with that Twilight guy me and FTW get along really well like you and me. I would've asked FTW his opinion on the two examples but as I said, I haven't heard from him since his initial message. I just want an opinion on whether or not to use those two examples as well and if they'd fit. I haven't even gotten that far with FTW.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 22:47, November 13, 2016 (UTC)

No prob. I think he wants the page split and as I said, we get along extremely well. I've never had a problem with him and he seems to rather like my edits. For example, he went to me on the fact that he thinks implosion doesn't fit that power well before he undid everything I did. I'm more concerned with your thoughts on those two examples I brought up. What do you think of those???--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 00:52, November 14, 2016 (UTC)

The ones I was asking about are when Amara caused that angel to explode in O Brother, Where Art Thou? and when Lucifer caused a pagan god to blow up. In the former its listed as smiting but it looked more like what Luci did to Jofiel. In the latter its listed as Luci ripping the guy apart with telekinesis which never made sense to me btw. We only saw Luci thrust his arm out and splash of blood and gore but to me that looked like when Cas exploded when Luci killed him in Swan Song. That's what I want your opinion on changing because it means changing the Luci and Amara pages as well.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 01:07, November 14, 2016 (UTC)

I meant Ganesh not Mercury. As for Amara I mean this:. That looks more like Molecular Combustion than Smiting to me. I've written the page and am now working on it.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 01:33, November 14, 2016 (UTC)

I agree. It's Molecular Combustion that Amara is using. I'm gonna remove that to make the page easier to load. Zane T 69 (talk) 01:41, November 14, 2016 (UTC)

I wrote the page and altered the varying pages I could think of that would be affected by the change. I left the implosion page for what Amara did to Metatron but we need a better image there as the one I posted I copied over from the Metatron page and is too big. I don't have any way to get a better image for it.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 01:51, November 14, 2016 (UTC)

Could you do something about the image/video thing on the Implosion page??? I copied the thing of Amara killing Metatron over from the Metatron page to there but its really too big and I have no way to fix that. Also, here's something else: what about in Soul Survivor when Crowley seemed to turn that demon to dust with a snap of his fingers??? I mean that seems like molecular combustion but it was also the only time he ever did that and no one really seems sure if he killed that demon or not.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 02:21, November 14, 2016 (UTC)

I'll leave the Crowley thing alone then. But we need a smaller version of that video/image thing. Is there any way for you to create one???--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 03:08, November 14, 2016 (UTC)

Well hopefully someone who does fixes it. Its probably only a matter of time.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 03:30, November 14, 2016 (UTC)

RE: Removal of "unconfirmed"-type statements
Because it's also unconfirmed if the Thule knew about fairies, or Leviathans, if Hitler dreamt of electric sheep while his soul was attached to that pocket watch, if souls taste like chicken, and if God created souls while he was high. In other words, you can make up just about anything that is "unconfirmed". This is often used by people who want to pass their speculation as relevant information (see the Leviathan talk page and various discussions about whether or not Leviathan beats Archangel). "Unconfirmed" can be literally anything that isn't directly contradicted in the series.

Orion ( T - B -C) 22:36, November 13, 2016 (UTC)

Personally, I feel a wiki shouldn't contain what isn't stated in a series, but rather what is. This is personal preference, of course, but I think it's more informative if I were to read "Leviathan can disable the powers of regular angels" than "Leviathan have not been confirmed to be able to disable the powers of archangels".

Orion ( T - B -C) 22:50, November 13, 2016 (UTC)

Forum
I tried to make a discussion for "The One You've Been Waiting For", but accidentally made a forum page titled "The One You've Been Waiting For Discussion." I tried to delete my mistake, but haven't been able to do it. Could you please delete it?Rafe Adler (talk) 16:12, November 14, 2016 (UTC)

You said it looked perfect. Are you saying I did it correctly? Kajune said it was weird and misleading which told me that I didn't create the discussion thread correctly. I was trying to do something like this http://arrow.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:46764  Rafe Adler (talk) 19:59, November 14, 2016 (UTC)

Ok sorry for the misunderstanding. Could you restore it please?Rafe Adler (talk) 22:13, November 14, 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. New background looks great. Also what do you think of my new profile picture?Rafe Adler (talk) 22:27, November 14, 2016 (UTC)

Wendigo from Hannibal (TV Series). The only difference is that it doesn't have red eyes in the show. It has white/silver eyes in the show.Rafe Adler (talk) 23:08, November 14, 2016 (UTC)

I am Back
Hey Zane, I am back, what has been recently and do you need help on any topic? SeraphLucifer (talk) 20:14, November 14, 2016 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Re: Admin seniority
I saw your post on WarGrowlmon's page. Admin seniority is not an actual rule observed here. It's more of a personal approach with respect to your senior admins--but you have every right to call out another admin if you honestly think something is wrong. In disputes you are not yet too sure on how to settle them, then yes, by all means, waiting for other admins is a good idea--I used to do that a lot, and I still do it, too, especially on matters that require consensus (i.e., deciding whether those display of powers need to be grouped together or if their title needed to be changed require consensus--the more members contributing, the better). However, I hope this doesn't inhibit you from getting your point across, if it needs to. FTWinchester (talk) 02:58, November 15, 2016 (UTC)

LockOldBlogs functionality
Hey, I've gone ahead and added the LockOldBlogs functionality as you proposed. Currently, the code changes are pending Wikia Staff review - and the changes will only be visible to the community after the changes have been approved. Calebchiam Talk 03:21, November 15, 2016 (UTC)
 * I've tested the code and it works great anyway. Expect to see it live in a few days or so. Calebchiam Talk 03:23, November 15, 2016 (UTC)

Re:Forum
When you say 'newer style' - what are you referring to exactly? If you're referring to the blog format, then the idea of having two forums: The Impala Forum and a more casual discussion space sounds appealing, but I'm curious as to why this is better than the current system of having The Impala Forum and many user blogs. If you can come up with a strong case for that, go ahead and put it up for discussion on Forum:The Impala. It's a change that will require community approval and Wikia staff's assistance. Calebchiam Talk 03:57, November 15, 2016 (UTC)
 * Seems rather oxymoronic to say that blogs aren't specialised for discussions when that's all they are really good for. Thanks for the example. I wasn't aware that Wikia had added threaded forum functionality to all Wikis, but by all means, go ahead and create a test forum. Just run it by the rest of the community when it's up and running. Cheers. Calebchiam Talk 04:51, November 15, 2016 (UTC)

Nice change of background.....I was wondering hoping it would include 'Baby' too....perhaps in the middle. That would be perfect....:)

The last suggestion for including 'Baby was by meAnnweshaAdhikari (talk) 13:32, November 15, 2016 (UTC)'

Categories
Isn't having a Category:Content pretty much standard? It's also shorter than Category:Supernatural Wiki which is a strange name since EVERYTHING here is the supernatural wiki, making its function essentially the same as Category:Browse. talk2ty 21:09, November 18, 2016 (UTC)

Wiki Navigation
Hey Zane, just made a minor tweak to Wiki Nav, what do you think? SeraphLucifer (talk) 22:30, November 18, 2016 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

just an observation
Hey, Zane - i went to marios targarean's page because of the name and happened to see your message, which i have to say sounds kind of mean. if you really want new contributors of good work on the wiki, i don't see how scoldy messages like that help. if one is still relatively uncomfortable with editing, especially in a language that is not native to them, sometimes mistakes aren't noticed until after 'Publish' is clicked. not everyone is only just trying to crank up their edit count, but are honestly fixing mistakes they'd like to correct themselves. i hope my saying so doesn't make you mad, but i had to say something. Reka12452 (talk) 00:37, November 19, 2016 (UTC)

Zane- i might agree with you if he'd done the same thing on even one other page, but it looks like his first one. that suggests to me that he is learning and will probably get better at it. when i first started editing it took a while before i even realized that every single edit was memorialized in 'History' and even longer before i noticed that there was a rolling edit count. i don't remember ever even considering the sandbox thing. in any event, maybe an occasional 'please' when you leave people such messages would make you sound more like a fellow collaborator and less like their boss, unless that's what you're going for. My $.02 that u didn't ask for ;)Reka12452 (talk) 01:08, November 19, 2016 (UTC)

Zane- Very Nice. as i said, your delivery is lacking. if you want to be nasty and call me names, i'll take that as my cue not to try to talk to you about anything on an adult level again. have a nice life. Reka12452 (talk) 01:28, November 19, 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Zane - I must admit that i failed to see the word "I" in your message, which gave it a decidedly different tone. Anywho, we both made our points, and as far as i’m concerned, "we’re good" indeed. Talk to ya later, Reka12452 (talk) 03:32, November 29, 2016 (UTC)

Re:Archive
The big ones like Dean and Sam could be archived. Nice idea. SeraphLucifer (talk) 10:20, November 19, 2016 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Not that I know of Gabriel456 (talk) 18:19, November 20, 2016 (UTC)

You're welcome Gabriel456 (talk) 19:07, November 20, 2016 (UTC)

Metatron's vessel
Here's the thing: everyone has Metatron's vessel listed as being named Marv. Where does that come from??? As far as I can tell, Marv is nothing more than a nickname Metatron sometimes used. I don't get why people have listed his vessel as that. I think it should be changed to Metatron's vessel instead of Marv because I have seen no proof that Marv is the vessel's name. I posted a message on the discussion for that character's page a long time ago about this but never got any sort of response.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 07:25, November 23, 2016 (UTC)

Blocking
We need to block the unregistered user who keeps doing that harmube thing. That's just vandalism and makes no sense anyway.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 06:58, November 29, 2016 (UTC)

I'm confused by your response. He intended to deface the page yet its not vandalism which by definition is defacing something???--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 17:04, November 29, 2016 (UTC)