User blog comment:TB93/Ramiel ruling Hell/@comment-30695490-20170304030209

It is a complex situation, because Ramiel seems a little lazy to be a king. While Azazel was a strategist, Ramiel would probably be reckless. Assuming he would rule Hell with seriousness, then we can suppose that Raphael would be able to restart the Apocalypse, as there would be no Crowley to give Castiel souls which means his faction would fall to Raphael, and I don't think Ramiel would interfere in a war between angels

However, it is also possible that nothing would happen, since to start the Apocalypse he would need either the Book of the Damned and a powerful witch like Rowena, with the ideal place for the ritual, or breaking the seals. Breaking the seals is theorically impossible since Lilith is already dead, and we don't know, for sure, if it's possible to ressurrect a demon. But I hardly think he would go for the Book of the Damned, since it means using dark magic and having the help of a witch, and Raphael's style is too arrogant to rely on something he would surely consider inferior

Assuming that nothing would happen and Raphael would fail in his plans and keep Heaven, most problems would not happen because the original problems would also not. Sam wouldn't even be ressurrected in first place, possibly. Although Abaddon would still appear due to the time travel, I don't think Abaddon would rebel in first place. What she wanted was a more militaristic Hell after all, and she would probably gain it, I think. However, even if she did, she would be crushed, because Ramiel is far superior than her in terms of power, even though she would survive due to the inability of being killed

In short, yeah, I think most of the problems after the Apocalypse, with exception of Abaddon's rise, would never have happened