User talk:WarGrowlmon18

Welcome
Hi, welcome to Supernatural Wiki! Thanks for your edit to the Angels page.

Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! -- MisterRandom2 (Talk) 03:12, August 16, 2012

Chat
If you have time, care to come to the wikia chat for a bit?&#91;&#91;User:Twilight Despair 5&#124;&#93;&#93; (&#91;&#91;The God of Creation&#93;&#93;) (talk) 01:06, May 15, 2013 (UTC) It's understandable. When you have time, can you please comment either on the blog or on a message about this blog. http://supernatural.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Twilight_Despair_5/Tablet_Theories. I am not one of those like "Hey, look at this idea" but I do like other feed back. As it helps to remove common sepeculation on topics to where, we can write unbias in the articles when, topics are not simple or open and closed.&#91;&#91;User:Twilight Despair 5&#124;&#93;&#93; (&#91;&#91;The God of Creation&#93;&#93;) (talk) 01:20, May 15, 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry I'm too busy.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 01:11, May 15, 2013 (UTC)

What's going on, dear editor? This wicked 'witch' wasn't a witch, she was a fairy. Thanks for your contributions, keep up the good work. -- ImperiexSeed, 2:20 PM, October 30th 2013
 * TECHNICLY she was both. She was referred to as a witch and they said there were other evil witches in Oz. Obviously she was a fairy-type witch or something like that.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 18:22, October 30, 2013 (UTC)


 * Hmm.... How can she be both? It's like saying a bird's both an Angel and a bird. But, she can be a witch-like fairy or a fairy-like witch. -- ImperiexSeed, 2:25 PM, October 30th 2013



Alright, stop!
Stop going to talk pages and saying, "Very poorly written!" First of all, if they're poorly written, FIX 'EM, DON'T yammer and fuss that they're poorly written! Second, these users try very hard to help contribute and I don't mean to put words into your mouth, but basically what you're saying is, "You're senselessly editing, let the qualified guys handle this." Thanks for all you do for this wiki, I appreciate it. -- ImperiexSeed, 3:45 PM, May 27th 2014

Hey! Don't ignore me. -- ImperiexSeed, 5:24 PM, May 30th 2014

Another Chance?
Hey, WarGrowlmon18. After I lost my admin rights a while back, CalebChiam said that later on, if the community was alright with it, he would return my rights. It has been nearly half a year since then, and I am requesting my rights back. I am leaving a message on the talk pages of established users, to see who is and isn't alright with me becoming an admin again. Twilight Despair 5 said that he is willing to give me another chance, and said he sees that I have improved since that time. RaghavD said he wouldn't be comfortable with me being an admin, however. FTWinchester said that the wikia needs a lot of help, and would be comfortable with me having rights, but he is unsure about the admin rights. I know I messed up last time, but I am asking you to give me another chance. I think everyone deserves a second chance, and promise I won't do anything to mess it up this time. What do you say, will you please give me another chance? EmpyreanSmoke (talk) 21:40, May 23, 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't even remember you so I don't know what you did. I'm also not an admin so that's not my choice. I'm only an admin on Gears of War Wiki and I don't know how I even landed that position.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 00:30, May 24, 2015 (UTC)

You don't need to be an admin to place a vote. You are a user here, so you get a say on what happens as well. I'm not going to get into exactly what happened, as I don't want an argument to arise, but I used to have admin rights, until I screwed that up, and now I am asking the community to give me another chance. The bureaucrat CalebChiam said he would return my admin rights of the community was fine with it, so I am trying to see who is willing to give me another chance. I think everyone deserves a second chance, and am asking you if you will please give me another chance? Please, your input matters. EmpyreanSmoke (talk) 00:44, May 24, 2015 (UTC)

Re: Battles
Sorry I could not get to you sooner. Yes, I have noticed an increase in activity/editing for that category and I thank you so much for doing so. I have had several plans that I never had time to act on and I must say I am more than satisfied with what you have done so far. I've always liked "Battle" pages as it highlights key events, major players and alliances. FTWinchester (talk) 13:20, November 5, 2015 (UTC).

Its contents are canon. Sue the titles are conjectural but its structure is based on canon plot and that alone so I don't see why it would violate rules of the wikia. And yeah, great work on those! I hope we could expand on our own wiki's category in the future--not too soon though, the revival of the x vs y threads is driving me off of here. FTWinchester (talk) 11:43, November 6, 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't understand the last part of that comment about the x versus y thing, but yeah I agree about keeping those pages. I don't understand the problem some people were having with putting those pages on there. I'm gonna do a bit more work on that, but like I said before I don't intend to do the entire series, at least not right now, that's too much work at this point.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 18:38, November 6, 2015 (UTC)
 * Yeah sorry. I meant the archangels vs leviathan fiasco. It's flared up again. It always does whenever we get an influx of new writers. Dear God I hope that debate dies. I don't even want to participate anymore, I am just duty bound to do so because I don't appreciate editors disregarding canon. And I will post on the discussion pages for the battles. FTWinchester (talk) 22:08, November 6, 2015 (UTC)
 * I didn't even know about that. Ugh. Well thanks for the support. Really.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 22:36, November 6, 2015 (UTC)
 * What are you so angry about? Which question have I not answered yet? Which discussion page because I am responding here to you and I also just posted on the talk page of capture of brady. I have always responded on the other contributor's page, not on mine. That was how the wiki worked when I started here. FTWinchester (talk) 22:40, November 6, 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks, that's all I wanted to know. I really don't know how this discussion page thing works, I don't really use them too much. Hate getting involved in discussions like that as its usually pointless like what you said about the whole Levi/Archangels thing (there's seriously a discussion on that when its not even a topic covered by the show???!!!) and when I do its on the discussion pages for the various articles. I usually don't respond to messages posted here or similar places on other Wikis as I never see the point and I can never seem to get an answer (not just from you FYI) when I do post here on the Wikis in response to comments about whether the people are watching my talk page or not. As I post in both places, I can never tell if its because I posted here or on someone's own talk page that I get a response and no one tells me. It just frustrated me, that's all because I can never get a response when I try to find out. That wasn't all your fault.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 22:45, November 6, 2015 (UTC)
 * Well, that explains why you haven't answered my message to your talk page on Buffy wiki. And I do respond to messages on my talk page, I just respond on the other talk page. I do not have time here as much as I used to in the past so do not be paranoid if I don't respond right away. FTWinchester (talk) 22:48, November 6, 2015 (UTC)
 * Hell, I haven't even been on that Wiki in awhile. If its something like a warning, I don't bother responding, not unless its something I actually care about. I posted the first comment about the battle thing to you as you started that section. I never intended to get into a debate with anyone about that but it turned into that. The comment on the Capture of Brady page in response to you where I mention that it wasn't the right place for that discussion wasn't meant to be aimed at you by the way. I know you know that. That was aimed at everyone because that really wasn't the right place for that and I just didn't feel like adding a separate comment for that. Wanted to make sure you knew that. Only reason I even caught that discussion was I happened to be working on the page at the time it was started. If I hadn't as I was only paying attention to the category discussion page (I don't have an email linked to the Wikis by the way which is another reason I may not get messages unless I'm paying attention to that particular wiki or get a message about something posted to my talk page at the top of the page like I do every time you respond here) all that work may have been deleted without me getting a say. I had to put up a fight to keep it as I'm sure you noticed and I had already done much of the work I've done in that category before they did that discussion. They waited awhile to say something and posted where I may not have even noticed if I hadn't been paying attention. That wasn't right in my opinion either especially since I had to fight to save the section and it could've been ended without me getting the chance because of where they decided to hold the discussion.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 22:54, November 6, 2015 (UTC)

Thanks from me
Hey WarGrowlmon18, I really appreciate what you are doing for this wikia. I wanted to thank you for your efforts and know that I support you for what are you doing, good job! SeraphLucifer (talk) 22:31, November 9, 2015 (UTC)SeraphLucifer
 * Thanks. I do what I can. I'm always a major contributor to Wikis when I'm interested in the subject. Got Administrator status on the Gears of War Wiki in fact though I don't know how that happened. I've been doing what I can with the battles but I've been busy so I haven't been able to finish the one I started a couple days ago. It was late at night and I had to go to be for work the next day. I'm gonna finish that one tonight though and am planning on turning the Rising of the Witnesses into a battle page as well since it really is.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 00:08, November 10, 2015 (UTC)

Gadreel
Hey WarGrowlmon18, I am not going to revert but I'd like to mention few things.

I don't think regular angels can use white light. When an Angel lost his or her grace, they become human but they still contain some powers. (super strength, telepathy, telekinesis...) It might be same as for Seraphs as well. Even when they are demoted they could use it but in a lower degree. That's my opinion and we never saw other regular angels when they were using this ability.

Gadreel used white light. Astral projection cannot explode and break stuff. He incapacitated demons and killed them with the Knife. You said that: " That's covered under the Astral Projection thing as if he ACTUALLY used that power, he'd have killed those demons and he used the knife instead." As I said before angels can control the power level of that ability. Lucifer knocks Cas out, other angels smite and they let some survive just like Naomi did that to waitress girl.

Lets talk about Metatron now. Crowley is a crossroad demon but he has more abilities than other ones. Metatron isn't a complete regular angel. His didn't lose any of his powers when he left Heaven. He was able to erase Enochian sigils. That isn't an actually proof that regular angels are able to use it.

Thanks for reading, I'd like to read your opinions about this topic and lets edit according to a mutual decision. We can ask admins opinions about it if you'd like to.
 * Actually the thing is Metatron is the Scribe of God but without the angel tablet he's not particularly powerful. He indicated that he's not very strong when he told Cas that he's not a fighter and needs Cas to help him with the "trials". He was no match for the Nephilim and was easily captured by Naomi and her followers. He did kill Naomi, but she was expecting him to be tied down so he likely caught her by surprise, especially since she was stabbed in the back of the head (never got how that drill thing killed her or how he escaped). He also didn't do any fighting except using his white light to rescue Kevin without the power of the angel tablet behind him. His own followers also easily defeated him when he lost his Godly powers. Cas didn't seem to think it would be a major problem to defeat him without that power as well. Other angels have shown powers that Cas lost the first time he Fell since the Fall and they aren't high-ranking. I mean low-level minions showed Smiting (Holy Terror when Bartholomew's angels kill Malachai's potential vessels) and Cas lost that quickly when he Fell in season 5. Cas was using the Grace of regular angels and was only stated to be back to full power once he got his original grace back. The Wiki listed him as a regular angel again until he got that so there's consensus there. I agree that Gadreel is more powerful and is likely higher ranking, but we don't know his rank for sure as its never stated and honestly I doubt it ever will be since he hasn't even been mentioned since his death. If he used White Light, he'd have killed those demons on the spot. That's too powerful an ability to have simply stunned them and caused that level of destruction to the diner. Those were low-level minions not powerful demons. They only had an edge due to their powerful vessels and using guns. Gadreel was also very weak at the time so I doubt he'd want to use such a power since that sort of thing would really weaken him. I mean if Resurrecting Cas and Charlie weakened him a lot then that definitely would.


 * Oh and I think your pissing people off with your actions. The other day I saw a message posted to I think FTWinchester's talk page asking for the Admins to do something about you.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 20:23, November 16, 2015 (UTC)


 * Another note about Metatron not being particularly powerful: he fled the instant he lost the angel tablet and Sam swung an angel blade at him. If he really was a powerful angel, he could've beaten Sam even without the power of the angel tablet when he didn't have Dean or other backup behind him. Metatron seemed kind of afraid when Sam swung that blade at him. The Ward erasing thing is because he's the Scribe of God, he said so himself. Being the Scribe gave him that special ability but that seems to be about it. The Holy Fire trick and other major powers he showed were stated to be due to the angel tablet.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 20:26, November 16, 2015 (UTC)


 * Oh and Metatron himself basically said that aside from being the Scribe of God, he's a regular angel. He said he was in the secretarial pool or something like that when he was given that position. It always seemed to me "Scribe of God" was more of a job description than anything else and because he did all the, well, scribing for God, he learned a few tricks. Nothing more. He wouldn't stand and fight without the power of the angel tablet, relying on Gadreel to do his dirty work and using surprise and Cas for other fights. He never fought directly when he had the chance without the angel tablet. I mean he fled Sam swinging an angel blade at him. Angels don't usually do that. Hell, in The Third Man an angel simply teleported behind Sam when he pulled one out. If Metatron was powerful enough without the angel tablet, he could've taken Sam in a fight. He could've disarmed him of the blade or something and smote him. He fled instead. He also didn't try to fight Cas in Heaven but tied him down instead and incapacitated him so he wouldn't have to fight. Tyrus also showed a low opinion of Metatron and his abilities instead of any kind of respect like one would give a higher-level angel.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 20:35, November 16, 2015 (UTC)
 * Firstly I agree with Metatron part. He isn't very strong but in terms of ability, he was more advanced than other angels. Sam wasn't able to defeat him to be honest. He could just throw Sam away, instead he chose to end Castiel. His strenght was same as regular angels. About white light, it isn't take a great effort to use as we see a weakened Cas was still able to use it. You imply that power was just Astral Projection. Astral Projection doesn't effect the background. Just shows the true nature of the supernatural being. About Gadreel, I think he was a Seraph since his appearence was same as Seraph Cas. Also he was pretty strong and other regular angels lost their wings but Gadreel didn't. Also when Cas was fallen at the first time, he wasted himself by using banishing sigil on his own vessel. Some of other fallen angels were at the same situation as Cas at that time. By the way I had some issues with some users but I never sweared them nor insult them. Some users just don't like me. I don't know why I made you mad... SeraphLucifer (talk) 20:48, November 16, 2015 (UTC)SeraphLucifer
 * Metatron's situation is same as Crowley's. They both have more abilities than their classes. Being the King of Crossroads/Scribe of God granted something else apparently. SeraphLucifer (talk) 20:53, November 16, 2015 (UTC)SeraphLucifer
 * Also if you want you can check my edits, I always edit neutrally and I have no intentions to corrupt the Wikia. SeraphLucifer (talk) 20:53, November 16, 2015 (UTC)SeraphLucifer
 * Actually Crowley was in charge of the Crossroads Demons, but he didn't seem to have any extra powers from it. As King of Hell he gained additional powers like Metatron gained additional powers from the angel tablet, but besides having a few abilities like Warding Removal, Metatron didn't seem to have anything a regular angel wouldn't. You also completely ignored my point on how regular angels have shown powers that being cut-off from Heaven deprived Cas of before. I think they dropped that idea a long time ago since the angels should've been cut-off but still retain those powers with no explanation. And again, there's consensus that Cas was a regular angel until he got his own grace back as he was listed as such after his return until Book of the Damned and he had that white light power in The Executioner's Song. Pretty sure that's also what he used to blast down the Bunker door to save Megatron.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 21:32, November 16, 2015 (UTC)
 * Missed the first part of the message. Cas was near-powerless when he did the banishing trick. The other angels still had full power long after the Fall. Metatron had a look of fear on his face when Sam swung that angel blade at him before he fled. As for Gadreel, he had broken wings. Cas had the same when he regained his grace. I think it was retconned so the angels still have their wings, but just broken, not gone completely. Tamiel also possessed the power to teleport. That's on his page which I wrote but did not put there. The Fall affected all the angels on Earth so they lost their wings, not just the ones in Heaven. They retconned a lot of things recently like the Reapers being angels now when before they were said to be a separate class of being.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 21:36, November 16, 2015 (UTC)

Battles Template
You ever tried editing an old Battle page of mine and only ever got broken links on the template once you apply the changes? FTWinchester (talk) 13:48, January 15, 2016 (UTC)
 * Don't think so. Don't think I ever really touched your battle pages. Why???--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 14:20, January 15, 2016 (UTC)
 * I wanted to resume working on the pages but I needed to update some of my previous work. However, doing so causes breaks in the links, not to mention editing wasn't as streamlined as before. FTWinchester (talk) 01:20, January 19, 2016 (UTC)
 * I have some broken links on my battle pages but those are just ones I haven't gotten around to writing yet. Honestly, I'm a little hooked on Heroes Reborn at the moment since Supernatural's been off the air for awhile but that hasn't.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 01:41, January 19, 2016 (UTC)
 * We might have to either switch the templates or recode it. I have the time to write the pages but I don't think I can work on templates right now. FTWinchester (talk) 01:53, January 19, 2016 (UTC)

Grammatical errors
Why are you purposefully inserting grammatical errors into articles? Specifically, I'm referring to your capitalizing random pronouns in the middle of sentences.

Orion ( T - B -C) 18:18, May 14, 2016 (UTC)
 * Not done on purpose, sorry. And not totally sure what you mean either as a result. Example???--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 18:21, May 14, 2016 (UTC)
 * Here, for one. You capitalized "he" in the middle of a sentence.


 * Orion ( T - B -C) 18:22, May 14, 2016 (UTC)
 * Oh THAT. That was about God. Generally people capitalize he and him when talking about God. Not really sure of the policy on these Wikis for that so I just did it that way too.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 18:59, May 14, 2016 (UTC)
 * While you may have an argument for capitalizing pronouns referring to God (although it's still grammatically incorrect, you could claim it to be a religious thing), there are no arguments for capitalizing pronouns referring to a a fictional TV character.
 * Orion ( T - B -C) 19:09, May 14, 2016 (UTC)
 * Okay, now I know not to do that. Honestly, its easier not to I just wasn't sure if I was supposed to.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 19:13, May 14, 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks. The last guy I told this to didn't even bother replying to me, so I had to report him.
 * Orion ( T - B -C) 19:15, May 14, 2016 (UTC)
 * No prob. It was simply a matter of not knowing how it was preferred here. At least your willing to work with people who make mistakes. Another Wiki I'm on??? Admin's a total dick and I think there's only one. Anywhere I could make a report about a Wiki Admin you know of??? Because I really need to. This guy runs his Wiki like none I've ever seen before, is unwilling to work with me, he just says what I do wrong but refuses to elaborate on how to fix it. Blocks me and comes up with excuses why not to unblock when I ask to work with him to fix what I do wrong... Oh ignores me for weeks then gets pissed when I don't get back to him right away. And his response to me calling him out on it is more of an "how do you like it" thing than an appropriate response. I'm an Admin myself on the Gears of War Wiki. Its not right to treat people like that!!!--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 20:21, May 14, 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure how it's preferred here, but I do know it's grammatically incorrect to capitalize any pronouns (except "I") in the middle of sentences - regardless of whom they refer to. As for your situation, I don't know of a way to get Wikia to demote an admin. Short of contacting a bureaucrat of the same wiki, or the admin stepping down on his own, I'm not sure it can be done. You could just try contacting Wikia and see what they say.
 * Orion ( T - B -C) 20:40, May 14, 2016 (UTC)
 * Anywhere I could make a report about a Wiki Admin you know of??? You can contact the Wikia staff here: http://community.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Contact/general --Lambda1 (talk) 21:22, May 14, 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you, I intend to.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 21:49, May 14, 2016 (UTC)

God isn't using a vessel
You actually took what Metatron said there seriously.... At best, it was an assumption he was making. God isn't using a vessel and certainly doesn't need to. -- Thescarypea, 6:25 PM, May 17th 2016
 * You sure??? Metatron called that form his Chuck meatsuit or something like that. Meatsuit's what they tend to call vessels on the show. Amara needs a vessel and she's God's older sister.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 01:57, May 18, 2016 (UTC)
 * Realize, after she was released, she was pretty weak from how long she was trapped, and now, at this point, while not needing it because of how powerful she is, just keeps it. -- Thescarypea, 10:15 PM, May 17th 2016
 * Okay.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 03:36, May 18, 2016 (UTC)

RE: Non-Canon
I am neither an admin nor a bureaucrat. You'd have to ask them.

Orion ( T - B -C) 17:58, October 13, 2016 (UTC)

Per your message to Blaze.
While I was watching the wiki, I noticed your message to Blaze. It should fine if you do that, so long as the pages are marked as non-canon. Furthermore, Blaze cannot give you "permission", the wiki is community project, you can create the page. But someone may contest it, if so refer them to this message, and debate with them. Zane T 69 (talk) 18:04, October 13, 2016 (UTC)

Understandable. Admins will have the word "Admin" by their name, on their user and talk pages. Zane T 69 (talk) 18:16, October 13, 2016 (UTC)

By here I assume you mean message walls, and of course we can. What else would you like to discuss? Zane T 69 (talk) 03:26, November 5, 2016 (UTC)

I've contacted FTW already, via talk page. I've asked Caleb if we have grounds for Desyopping TD5. Zane T 69 (talk) 03:36, November 5, 2016 (UTC)

If you want, and only if YOU want to. You can feel free to complain to Caleb too. I want you to know I'm not trying to coerce you, that's why I capitalized you. Zane T 69 (talk) 03:40, November 5, 2016 (UTC)

It was a miscommunication. I've suggested TD5 and I get some rest and talk tomorrow, when calmer. Zane T 69 (talk) 03:51, November 5, 2016 (UTC) Caleb is the wikis B-crat. Desyopping is removing admin rights. I withdrew my request. Since the issue is resolved, I suggest we all forgive and learn from this. I also apologize for my part in the debate. Zane T 69 (talk) 04:32, November 5, 2016 (UTC)
 * Uh you sent me so many messages here that I'm confused now. Who's Caleb for one thing??? And what's Desypopping???--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 04:13, November 5, 2016 (UTC)

Well, you can request Rollback rights from Caleb. That simple. Zane T 69 (talk) 04:54, November 5, 2016 (UTC)

No problem. Congratulations. Zane T 69 (talk) 03:25, November 6, 2016 (UTC)

I was wondering what your opinion on this is? Zane T 69 (talk) 15:49, November 7, 2016 (UTC)

Who? Caleb? He's simply very professional, and he's somewhat inactive and makes his time here count. Also, thank you for giving your support. Zane T 69 (talk) 17:42, November 7, 2016 (UTC)

Oh, he's just proud of his work. Zane T 69 (talk) 17:48, November 7, 2016 (UTC)

I responded on the pages talk page. Zane T 69 (talk) 16:17, November 23, 2016 (UTC)

Thanks
Hey WG18, thanks for your contributions and your efforts recently. Helped a lot. SeraphLucifer (talk) 09:55, October 15, 2016 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Hey
Zane and I, realized there was some miss communications on the talk page. So without being my normal long winded self I apologize for thinking you accused me of something. I misunderstood that post I copied.&#91;&#91;User:Twilight Despair 5&#124;&#93;&#93; (&#91;&#91;The God of Creation&#93;&#93;) (talk) 04:08, November 5, 2016 (UTC) I checked your reverts and that anons contributions were actually valid. Zane T 69 (talk) 20:36, January 1, 2017 (UTC)
 * That's something I guess.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 04:11, November 5, 2016 (UTC)

Okay, your not in trouble, we'll chalk that up to the learning curve. Zane T 69 (talk) 21:45, January 1, 2017 (UTC)

It's still fine, your not in trouble. You know now and that should prevent further incidents. Zane T 69 (talk) 22:13, January 1, 2017 (UTC)

Re:Rollback
Hey WarGrowlmon. You have been granted use of the rollback tool. Please keep in mind that rollback is a tool for reverting vandalism and is strictly for that purpose only; good-faith edits should be undone with an explanation in the edit summary. Cheers. Calebchiam Talk 03:05, November 6, 2016 (UTC)

Re: Implosion
Honestly, by the looks of it, the instances listed in the page all looked different from each other. The most accurate in terms of the actual meaning of the term seems the be Metatron's case. Lucifer using it on Castiel and Godstiel using it on Raphael doesn't clearly display they "imploded", merely they were annihilated/obliterated. As for the Darkness using it on the angel, it looked more like the angel disintegrated. I'm sure they're all similar displays of power, but I don't think "Implosion" is the appropriate catch-all term. FTWinchester (talk) 16:40, November 10, 2016 (UTC)

Honestly, the whole debate confuses me. You and FTW need to debate this yourselves; I don't want it to seem I'm trying to "over-rule" or interfere in his personal debates. Zane T 69 (talk) 22:38, November 13, 2016 (UTC)

Okay, then. You can split the page, but, as FTW is a senior Admin he reserves the right to over-rule me and revert the edits. I just didn't wanna cause problems between my fellow Admins. Zane T 69 (talk) 23:01, November 13, 2016 (UTC)

I don't remember all the instances. I do trust your judgment, however. Zane T 69 (talk) 01:00, November 14, 2016 (UTC)

I think due to Mercury' body not being shown, (atleast to my memory) he could have simply had his throat slashed with TK. I agree that Luci blew up at least one Pagan deity and Castiel. If Amara blew someone up, then I say molecular combustion. I'm afraid I haven't been watching much of the older Episodes recently. I've been writing fanfiction. Zane T 69 (talk) 01:26, November 14, 2016 (UTC)

Okay. Sorry, I meant to reply on your talk page. It looks pretty good. Zane T 69 (talk) 02:08, November 14, 2016 (UTC)

I have no idea what to do on the page. I'll try something though. Honestly IDK about what Crowley did, IMO he's just a weak but clever demon. Zane T 69 (talk) 02:29, November 14, 2016 (UTC)

I don't know how too. Zane T 69 (talk) 03:13, November 14, 2016 (UTC)

I don't know why you told Zane I haven't responded to the "darkness vs angel" scenario but it's right up there on my comment--the angel appeared to have disintegrated more than imploded. Also, I didn't mean that these acts are entirely separate (they are after all, displays of immense power in obliterating a target)--just that the initial term used (Implosion) wasn't a very accurate catch-all term as was displayed. Nevertheless, I like your separation of the articles much better. FTWinchester (talk) 02:54, November 15, 2016 (UTC)

I fixed the image and I fixed the format of the page as well. You can resize the photo by clicking it from the editor, dragging the upper right hand corner (a resize icon will appear) or clicking the pop-up option bar to edit the photo and then manually input the desired custom size or choose the default size. FTWinchester (talk) 05:02, November 16, 2016 (UTC)

No problem. FTWinchester (talk) 05:07, November 16, 2016 (UTC)

I strongly disagree, here's why. Directly from Calebs userpage no less. " When it comes to vandalism, always look for  malicious intent . Remember that not everyone knows how to edit Wikis, they may experiment and add nonsense text or blank a page completely by accident. For an act to be considered vandalism, there are two criteria that need to be fulfilled: (1) the act itself defaces the page, (2) the act itself was  fully intended  to deface the page - these are two very different things."

As you can see: the vandalism was fully intended to deface the page and vandalism is inherently malicious. He did it multiple times and even edit warred over it; breaking the Three Revert Rule. That's why he was blocked, he broke two rules. Zane T 69 (talk) 15:30, November 29, 2016 (UTC)

His edits were fully intended to deface the page, therefore malicious vandalism. He did vandalize the page and break the 3RR rule. For breaking those two rules: he was blocked, for a mere three days. Zane T 69 (talk) 17:15, November 29, 2016 (UTC)

Because I strongly disagreed, with us needing to unban a vandal who's intent was to deface the page. Zane T 69 (talk) 17:45, November 29, 2016 (UTC)

Copy/pasted from Darths wall:

Those categories aren't needed. Most pages list who they were killed by, and countless things have been killed by the Winchesters. Thousands of them. It's excessive and unnecessary. The categories for minor characters are unnecessary, also. Azazel, for instance could have a mere section of his page listing those he's killed. Zane T 69 (talk) 03:14, December 12, 2016 (UTC)

I hope this explains my actions, to your satisfaction.

Sorry, meant to post this here; instead of my wall.

I'll consider supporting the idea. Right now, I'm just thinking over another issue. Zane T 69 (talk) 04:30, December 12, 2016 (UTC)

hello i am new here PsychoticPuppetMasters (talk) 06:53, December 29, 2016 (UTC)

Brady Schlecker
We meet again. :-) I edited page of Brady Schlecker because he was in Ethon as Rand Guard. BTW: I was so glad when I identified him, before some time!

http://vignette3.wikia.nocookie.net/stargate/images/7/7a/Rand_Protectorate_Guard_4.png/revision/latest/scale-to-width-down/175?cb=20161016084218

--Matthew Bowyer Fan (talk) 08:22, January 2, 2017 (UTC)

Uh dude, this is the Supernatural Wiki. Pretty sure that's Stargate.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 16:36, January 2, 2017 (UTC)

I just gave you photo of Brady in Stargate. So you can see he was in Ethon. --Matthew Bowyer Fan (talk) 16:47, January 2, 2017 (UTC)

Apparently we failed understand each other. I added on page this sentence: In 2006 he appeared in Stargate SG-1 Episode (Ethon) but was uncredited for this part.

As proof I gave you that photo from Stargate so you could/can check. --Matthew Bowyer Fan (talk) 17:27, January 2, 2017 (UTC)

Oh... uh okay. I'm still confused why you sent that to me though??? And my response was because on the Stargate Wiki someone sent me a bunch of pictures and asked if I could identify the actors the other day. I couldn't by the way. I thought you were that guy.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 22:57, January 2, 2017 (UTC)

I was, but I wanted to explain my edits to someone here on Wikia. Since I noticed you also here I wanted also show you that Brady is one I identified before, other 3 remains unknown so I asked in case you know them. --Matthew Bowyer Fan (talk) 16:09, January 3, 2017 (UTC)

Uh, okay.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 16:13, January 3, 2017 (UTC)

Okay, then. Lol. Zane T 69 (talk) 23:26, January 12, 2017 (UTC)

Clay Thompson needs an image on his page
Dear WarGrowlmon18,

I'm a big fan of your work and I was hoping you could do me a favor. One of my favorite pages on this wiki is the clay thompson page. I really like that page but there is no image for the character. i was hoping you could find an image of the character from the show and put it on his page. I would be very grateful and it would make the page so much cooler. It is alright if you don't want I'll understand. If you do try please put a good image. Thank you for your time.71.75.53.75 03:56, January 14, 2017 (UTC)Ryan Cruz
 * Thanks for the compliment truly. However, images are one thing I can't and don't know how to do. Look over the pages I've created and you'll see that the images are either copied over from other pages, added by other users or don't exist. I wouldn't even know where to find an image for Clay let alone how to put it here. Your best bet is to message one of the Admins I've been talking to on this page.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 04:58, January 14, 2017 (UTC)

Hey, WG18. I noticed what you said above and wanted to suggest you creating a sandbox to experiment on adding images. If you want to learn, of course. How-to create a sandbox. Zane T 69 (talk) 22:20, January 15, 2017 (UTC)

Just thought I'd offer the help. There are plenty of images on the wiki, over 9400 I think. Zane T 69 (talk) 00:14, January 16, 2017 (UTC)

Caleb informed me I needed to create a forum for an infinite ban of ImperiexSeed. If you would like too, please register your opinion here. Zane T 69 (talk) 18:28, February 17, 2017 (UTC)

While I'll let Caleb get back to you first, I wanted you to know that you have my support in your eventual RFA. I'd create it myself, but I'm not sure if I'm allowed. Zane T 69 (talk) 21:32, February 18, 2017 (UTC)

Lol, yes you would. BTW, I offered you my support before you could request it. Just look above and compare the times of your post on my page with that one. You deserve to be an admin, your hard working and loyal and have proven yourself as an exceptionally mature and reliable person. Zane T 69 (talk) 21:34, February 18, 2017 (UTC)

Some will most likely research your edits and see if you've ever gotten trouble. I wrote you a pretty glowing letter of support, and I'm sure it will be a factor. I think I was elected with very little support, but I'd like to think I've proven myself a good admin. Yes, I'm sure you will get plenty of support, don't be surprised if you get a lot of support. There are very few truly active admins, mostly Seraph and I. The others rarely come onto the wiki, and most of the work falls to the two of us. Zane T 69 (talk) 21:43, February 18, 2017 (UTC)

Human Witches
Do witches count as Human Villains or just Humans? Kajune (talk) 00:09, February 11, 2017 (UTC)

My bad
Dear WarGrowlmon18,

I am sorry for copying some of your material. I didn't know it was wrong and I promise to not do it again. I will do my best in the future to not do this again.ChrisG1999 (talk) 02:35, February 11, 2017 (UTC)ChrisG1999

Law and Order Wiki
Hey Wargrowlmon, we can discuss that topic outside the forum page, what's the user's name? I know Imperiex has few side accounts. SeraphLucifer (talk) 18:05, February 18, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

I think that's not him and I am pretty sure. SeraphLucifer (talk) 20:54, February 18, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Hey. Thought I'd ask your opinion on this. Zane T 69 (talk) 04:01, March 2, 2017 (UTC)

Yeah, I actually asked them before you. Sorry! It's my thing, I consult active admins on such things, get their opinions. It's an in grained habit. I just suddenly realized... "WG18 will likely be an admin soon, I should get his opinion too!" Zane T 69 (talk) 04:20, March 2, 2017 (UTC)

Are you going to link the Colt Bullet Creation Ritual page and the Colt page? I'm only asking because the first is currently an orphan page, a page with no links to it. Those pages are a pain in the butt to deal with for me. Zane T 69 (talk) 03:25, March 3, 2017 (UTC)

Okay, that's fine. Just making sure. Zane T 69 (talk) 03:28, March 3, 2017 (UTC)

I actually saw a place to put a link also. Zane T 69 (talk) 03:33, March 3, 2017 (UTC)

Re:Becoming an Admin
Hi. Please follow the instructions here if you'd like to request for adminship. Before you start an RfA however, I'd recommend you read up on our policies and understand the nature of the decision-making processes on Supernatural Wiki (i.e. how consensus is made.) You have a good history of edits and contributions, but adminship requires level-headedness, good judgement and a sound understanding of policies/processes (something you yourself have admitted to lacking.) Cheers. Calebchiam Talk 01:52, February 19, 2017 (UTC)
 * There's no 'permission' to be granted here. Run an RfA if you wish. Some newer Wikis give out admin status freely because they lack the processes to properly vet applicants; I'm not saying whatever Wiki you were a part of did that, but it matters very little that you have admin status on other Wikis. Cheers. Calebchiam Talk 04:16, February 19, 2017 (UTC)

Alright, I'll do that, just let me check the recent edits for vandalism and stuff. Zane T 69 (talk) 15:13, February 19, 2017 (UTC)

Alright, it's done. You need to answer questions and such, here: http://supernatural.wikia.com/wiki/Supernatural_Wiki:Requests_for_adminship/WarGrowlmon18. Zane T 69 (talk) 15:54, February 19, 2017 (UTC)

My advice is to take Caleb's advice, it's really good advice. Zane T 69 (talk) 16:22, February 19, 2017 (UTC)

Just promise yourself not to get angry at vandals and the like. If you view my block notices you'll see that there cold and detached and rarely vary. Letting yourself get angry may cost you your adminship, just don't take it personally and know that someone will vandalize a page and you will likely clean up. It's just a fact of life, but I don't think this will be an issue for you. Zane T 69 (talk) 16:41, February 19, 2017 (UTC)

Theres actually a blocking policy on Caleb's userpage and I copied it onto mine. Zane T 69 (talk) 17:02, February 19, 2017 (UTC)

I was busy last night and was away from the wiki. Let me look into the matter. Zane T 69 (talk) 16:31, February 20, 2017 (UTC)

More advice: When you revert an edit, you should give a reason, especially if the other person reverts it back. Just some helpful advice to make you a better admin: link to minor complaint. This will not effect my support for your adminship, you still have it. Zane T 69 (talk) 05:43, February 24, 2017 (UTC)

Hello, WarGrowlmon. I never really left, I just slowed down dramatically in my activity since life caught up with me. I'll be sure to drop a message of support. Good luck! FTWinchester (talk) 17:54, February 27, 2017 (UTC)

Okay. Seraph, FTW, and I have discussed it and agreed that you may need mentoring for your admin duties. I'd like you to inform me which admin related duties you have experience in. Zane T 69 (talk) 20:35, February 27, 2017 (UTC)

Alright, I'll try to provide an outline. My ideas of what Admins should do:
 * Scanning/inspecting the edits since your last visit on Special:RecentChanges. This ensures vandalism and other infractions are exposed and dealt with.
 * Patrolling edits via Special:Newpages. I once had to patrol and proof read thirty pages, because I didn't know I had to do that. It took me hours.
 * Check the recently uploaded photos/videos. Doing this makes sure everyone complies with our image policy. Categorizing said photos properly, and inspecting previous categorization to make sure it's accurate.

You can block users from their contributions page of their user profiles, and check their block logs and talk pages for previous blocks and warnings. You have experience as a rollback. You'll need to interfere in edit wars, arguments and properly ensure wikia's over arching rules are obeyed Wikia Terms of Use. You will need to make sure you provide a block reason and warnings for other admins to use as reference and evidence of previous offenses.

Seraph and I do sometimes go into chat and do years old undone admin work/maintenance. It allows us to debate and co-ordinate in moments instead of minutes and allow a wiser usage of time. Zane T 69 (talk) 20:52, February 27, 2017 (UTC)

Basically you just check every edit/page revision. IE if a page has one edit, just check the "diff" between pages. If it has multiple you click "hist" and scan/proof-read/inspect the edits.

On Special:Newpages, un-patrolled edits will be in a sickly yellow highlight. You'll need to proof read those pages, then mark patrolled or mark patrolled and then make any changes At the very bottom you will see a yellow link "Mark patrolled" or something like it. Zane T 69 (talk) 21:23, February 27, 2017 (UTC)

Congratulations. If you'd like a project I think you'll excell at, let me know. Zane T 69 (talk) 19:40, March 4, 2017 (UTC)

Updates
Well done updating the wikia. You always do a good job. Always first and always ready. :D Kajune (talk) 02:24, March 3, 2017 (UTC)

Another week and another awesome updating from you. Well done as always. Your hard work is appreciated. Kajune (talk) 01:12, April 7, 2017 (UTC)

Adminship
Congratulations on your successful RfA! You can now do the following:
 * Edit and move fully protected pages
 * Delete, restore, and view deleted revisions of pages and images
 * Protect pages from edits, moves, or creation by non-sysops
 * Block and unblock users and IP addresses and ranges
 * Edit the interface pages in the MediaWiki: namespace
 * View Special:Unwatchedpages

Be sure to brush up on our policies and Style Guide. Cheers. Calebchiam Talk 16:17, March 4, 2017 (UTC)

Basically I'd like to offer you a small project you could do quickly, along with some minor upkeep on it. Special:Lonelypages, also known as orphaned pages, I have been trying my best to clean up the problem, but you're more knowledgeable of SPN than myself. Basically, the pages there need links going to them. I think I've done over fifty pages, which should no longer be listed there, but I couldn't find the time or a way to do the rest. Zane T 69 (talk) 21:13, March 4, 2017 (UTC)

That's all I ask, just do your best and if there is some left we can delegate to others. Zane T 69 (talk) 02:01, March 5, 2017 (UTC)

If you wanna block Master-of-Spells, you can. He was warned before and I'm about to review his entire edit history. Zane T 69 (talk) 18:07, March 6, 2017 (UTC)

I reviewed his edits and gave him an official warning. That should hopefully wake him up and make him check his actions. Zane T 69 (talk) 18:33, March 6, 2017 (UTC)

The maximum allowed, three days. If you want to use the blocking policy Seraph and I use, it's on Calebs page, and I copied/pasted it onto mine. Caleb would probably be angry if you didn't use it, actually. I disliked it at first, but I've grown to like it and would use it on a wiki if I created one. Zane T 69 (talk) 19:13, March 6, 2017 (UTC)

Nice! Maybe we'll get them as contributer then. Zane T 69 (talk) 19:23, March 6, 2017 (UTC)

If you believe the Lucifer's Cage Spell page needs to be deleted, please follow my instructions. You need to learn how to delete pages. First, click the link to the page, when you do go down to the bar at the bottom of the wiki page. It will say, follow, delete, and My Tools. Hover over "My Tools, and Right-Click "What links here" and open in a new window. This allows you to remove links to the deleted page after or before to avoid red links. Once that's done, click the drop down area on the edit button at the top of the page, and then click delete. That's how you delete a page, if you have any questions don't hesitate to ask. Zane T 69 (talk) 19:18, March 10, 2017 (UTC)

Congratz WG! I haven't been here for a while so I didn't notice your promotion. Wish you the best mate. SeraphLucifer (talk) 03:21, March 11, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

The Deceased category dates back to 2010, the living ones is a new creation by him. I'll begin the mop up of his mess, strike that, Kajune already did. I deleted the new category though, the Deceased one is understandable and worthwhile. The other was pure stupidity. Zane T 69 (talk) 14:50, March 27, 2017 (UTC)

Then he may have tried re-creating the deleted category, if he tries it again I'll block him. Zane T 69 (talk) 15:34, March 27, 2017 (UTC)

In that case, I'll give him an official warning if he does it again, and a three day block if he continues. Zane T 69 (talk) 19:43, March 27, 2017 (UTC)

Go ahead, I agree that it's viable and needed. Zane T 69 (talk) 02:01, March 31, 2017 (UTC)

Hey, WG18. I created a forum to discuss and approve the the Seasons Infobox. Link. Zane T 69 (talk) 15:11, April 2, 2017 (UTC)

Re:Boy King
Hey WG18, should we add that alias again? I think it is unnecessary since they only called him once and it wasn't really a title type of thing. SeraphLucifer (talk) 09:47, April 4, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Question Mark
Ehm, WG you don't have to use "!!!" when speaking with someone. It is kinda rude. We should be kind against users. SeraphLucifer (talk) 19:45, April 7, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

I did. I usually block people for three days for blatant vandalism and warn possible vandals. Zane T 69 (talk) 23:19, April 7, 2017 (UTC)

We can try getting the matter passed after the Infobox matter is passed or denied. Zane T 69 (talk) 23:24, April 7, 2017 (UTC)

I will. Zane T 69 (talk) 23:34, April 7, 2017 (UTC)

Perhaps putting all of a characters kills on a separate page and linking them would be better, the main character pages are already massive and a pain to load and edit. Or was that what you were talking about? Zane T 69 (talk) 01:50, April 8, 2017 (UTC)

Why did you revert my edit on the Shapeshifting page? Sure it was long and perhaps a bit run on, but the way it was before was too short. It talked about how a Shapeshifter can gain the memories of those they shift into that are alive, but it doesn't say how a Shapeshifter shifted into them, by shedding their skin or being able to shift seamlessly like the Alpha.

It was too run on. If you make better sentences so that they aren't run on I won't have to get rid of it.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 21:16, April 10, 2017 (UTC)

What do you mean "if you make better sentences"? I took that directly from the Shapeshifters page and how would I fo that anyway? It looks fine to me. I don't really know what I'm doing and wouldn't know where to start. You could have revised it yourself or have someone else do it for you instead of reverting it.

Looks like that might need to be fixed then on that page. But also, that page is about the power not the various beings that have it. The power doesn't require a long detailed explanation about what a species can do with it like that.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 01:36, April 11, 2017 (UTC)

Well yeah, but it's important to know how they do it. What is there now is way too short and needs a little more detail/info. Saying how a shapeshifter gains the memories of those they shift into as long as they're alive is pretty much what a species does with shapeshifting.

Not really, it just needs a basic description, that's all we do with any of the power pages.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 05:56, April 11, 2017 (UTC)

I'm just saying it have a little more detail. If there should be anything about Shapeshifters shapeshifting it should be how they do it like how it says that ghouls can take a person's form by eating their flesh, rather than that they gain the memories of those they shifted into that are still alive.

Its unnecessary as is this argument.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 02:47, April 12, 2017 (UTC)

I agree, feel free to create it. Zane T 69 (talk) 03:15, April 14, 2017 (UTC)

Did you want the killed by stuff to be a page, sub-listing (Which I strongly oppose), or a category? We do have three major issues, the killed by listing, implementing the Season Infobox, and then gathering support for the Angelbox. I'd like us to find a way to resolve the killed by listing without a forum if possible, so in all likely hood it will be a quick vote. Several have supported the killed by idea, so we could call that soft consensus, and just decide which method to list them. Zane T 69 (talk) 22:27, April 17, 2017 (UTC)

Recent changes for archangels
Hi WG18, what do you think about the recent changes I made for the Michael, Lucifer, Gabriel and Raphael. In the past, Zane and I talked about removing unconfirmed informations and unnecessary stuff. Also it is known that Michael etc. was a lot stronger than Raphael, I didn't include him since it wasn't directly mentioned. This way we can actually put fully confirmed stuff to the weakness section and avoid edit conflicts. SeraphLucifer (talk) 23:38, April 22, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Re:Weaknesses
We know that they could be killed, exorcised trapped etc, it is still writing in the general demons, crossroad demons or angels page. The thing is removing unnecessary stuff. It is better to show what was used against them instead of the general weaknesses. SeraphLucifer (talk) 16:47, April 24, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Lance and Colt could stay but First Blade should be removed. I think it is better to keep it short. SeraphLucifer (talk) 19:05, April 24, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Sorry, what user? Recent Changes was flooded by Reka categorizing images. And no, they aren't allowed to do that, and you can revert and warn them. Zane T 69 (talk) 14:47, May 3, 2017 (UTC)

EDIT: If you meant Supernatural4life then he reverted his edits to his userpage. Zane T 69 (talk) 14:49, May 3, 2017 (UTC)

I handled it, and made sure he could move his project somewhere more appropriate. Zane T 69 (talk) 14:55, May 3, 2017 (UTC)

No problem. Keep an eye on Reka's actions, I suspect she uploads, categorizes, but doesn't use photos to get a higher edit count. I'm thinking of possible punishments and will soon ask if it's against the rules. Zane T 69 (talk) 15:04, May 3, 2017 (UTC)

Cast Pictures
Uh hi, was changing the characters' pictures to the official ones that they released illegal? Just asking. Touchinos (talk) 16:19, May 3, 2017 (UTC)

Oh I see. Well, alright then. Can I use them on the actors' pages instead? Touchinos (talk) 16:25, May 3, 2017 (UTC)

Relationships Template
Hey, I'm just gonna ask a random admin (Idk who I should ask specifically lol) but I was wondering if it's alright to create a new template like this for the relationship pages so they won't look too empty? I'll do the editing and all that of course :) Touchinos (talk) 13:02, May 4, 2017 (UTC)

I know, I blocked him. Zane T 69 (talk) 01:51, May 5, 2017 (UTC)

Go for it. Good idea. Zane T 69 (talk) 03:36, May 5, 2017 (UTC)

Lol. Zane T 69 (talk) 03:44, May 5, 2017 (UTC)

Celebrating the Life of Asa Fox
First time using this so I might make a mistake. I have a question about Supernatural season 12 episode 6 "Celebrating the Life of Asa Fox". In the beginning it shows Mary saving Asa when he was a little boy in 1980 but Mary looks old like she does in previous season 12 episodes. Shouldn't Mary look a lot younger since that scene was from 1980 and in the episode's present its 2016? Thanks 172.58.173.62 18:04, May 7, 2017 (UTC)Lalo
 * She looked like that in the Pilot three years after saving Asa. The younger versions of her played by a different actress were from 1973 and 1978 I believe it was. Since she was closer to her Pilot age and the original actress was obviously available they wouldn't have had an issue using her.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 18:54, May 7, 2017 (UTC)

Bad writing
Pardon me for my bad writing. XD I'm not as good as you, and I barely watched the episode myself. Kajune (talk) 03:30, May 12, 2017 (UTC)

Then write it yourself. Write every single page with missing information perfectly. I won't interrupt. :) Kajune (talk) 03:48, May 12, 2017 (UTC)

Re:Crowley's Fate
I thought that it could be Olivette too but that was uncertain. Under normal circumstances, I'd list Crowley as unknown or deceased but it was apparent that he didn't die since no flash light appeared on his body. Also we have confirmation that he will be in 12x23. So I think it is better to list him alive. SeraphLucifer (talk) 07:21, May 12, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

If we have confirmation that he is indeed alive, then I agree that we should list him as alive. Although both of your arguments have merit, and I'm gonna call myself neutral in this now. Zane T 69 (talk) 16:27, May 12, 2017 (UTC)

In the future, please just try to fix up the edits instead of reverting them. I know it's a pain in butt to do; especially on long pages like Lucifer, but the edits were well-intentioned and needed. I will be contacting him also. You aren't in trouble, but you need to go that extra mile if you have the time and if you don't: put it on a to-do list. I know the grunt work gets tedious, but multiple people benefit from our actions and work. Zane T 69 (talk) 19:37, May 13, 2017 (UTC)

Oh, I understand. I recently resigned as Content Mod on Riordan wiki to free up time. You aren't in trouble, nor am I angry with you, real-life has to take priority. If you don't have time, and it's something like that and let someone fix it later or put it on a to-do list. I hope you're okay and everything, and hopefully you'll have more free time soon. Zane T 69 (talk) 19:45, May 13, 2017 (UTC)

Well that's definitely understandable and I'm pleased that you even checked the wiki while at work. Zane T 69 (talk) 19:55, May 13, 2017 (UTC)

I looked into it, and I only saw the proper ritual page that you created. If you still see then I don't know what could be wrong, but just give it a few days. Zane T 69 (talk) 19:21, May 19, 2017 (UTC)

I checked all nine pages and still nothing, I advise you to wait a few days. Zane T 69 (talk) 19:31, May 19, 2017 (UTC)

Next time, if I warn somebody and you see it, then just give them a three day block. That would have stopped his misbehavior. If someone removes warnings, please restore them, that is evidence of wrongdoing that they destroyed. Zane T 69 (talk) 13:57, May 21, 2017 (UTC)

Okay. Still if they continue their misbehavior after I give them a warning, then I need you to block them for three days. We need to improve our team work, and if you need help with something or a request, let me know. Zane T 69 (talk) 17:52, May 21, 2017 (UTC)

Families
Well done with the two family pages. They look beautiful. :) Kajune (talk) 06:04, May 23, 2017 (UTC)

Well done on figuring that out, and did you want to create a list or category? I think that's what we discussed. Zane T 69 (talk) 14:54, May 25, 2017 (UTC)

Honestly, that's a horrible idea. I'm in favor of creating a list and linking to it from the persons page. Those lists will likely be huge and will make it near impossible to edit longer pages. Zane T 69 (talk) 15:10, May 25, 2017 (UTC)

Yes, that's what I meant. And I agree with your suggestion. Since the idea was already popular in the past, you can go ahead and implement it. That free's up time to vote on the Demonsbox and other work that needs doing; there is a lot of it. Zane T 69 (talk) 18:25, May 25, 2017 (UTC)

Yes, that would probably be best. Zane T 69 (talk) 01:38, May 26, 2017 (UTC)

Hey, I wanted to know if you have any ideas for work that needs done. So far I've identified... Unused photos, under 1000 of them. And I've been working on broken file links. I think it's important to clean up after the previous admins, while still working towards a bright future for the wiki. Zane T 69 (talk) 17:38, May 26, 2017 (UTC)

Alright. If you need something to do after that, let me know. I've identified a few problem areas and I'm having to finish up another project that I thought was finished. Zane T 69 (talk) 01:55, May 27, 2017 (UTC)

Looks great man. Great work as always! Zane T 69 (talk) 04:20, May 27, 2017 (UTC)

I checked your sandbox and it looks great. If you wanna go ahead and create the proper page and move it's contents there that would be fine. Zane T 69 (talk) 14:40, May 27, 2017 (UTC)

"Killed by {Character Name}" and you can create the category "Killed By Pages" to categorize these pages, which are likely to be five or more. Zane T 69 (talk) 15:27, May 27, 2017 (UTC)

Certain other Big Bads would merit a page, I'm sure Lucifer has killed A LOT. Zane T 69 (talk) 18:28, May 27, 2017 (UTC)

Yeah, all of those merit lists. I think they have killed enough to actually form a list. Zane T 69 (talk) 19:37, May 27, 2017 (UTC)

Great work. You've gotten a lot done so far. Zane T 69 (talk) 21:23, May 27, 2017 (UTC)

Killed by
YES, someone is making "killed by" pages! Great job! Beautiful work. This wikia owes you a lot. :D Kajune (talk) 02:22, May 28, 2017 (UTC)

What do you think about making a "Killed by..." page that has all four Princes in it, instead of one each? Kajune (talk) 11:48, May 28, 2017 (UTC)

Your Killed By section.....I remember the Walking Dead version not having a description. I personally find it a little redundant to add a description when the page already states it elsewhere. Also, if you're aiming to be like the Walking Dead wikia in that respect, wouldn't you add whom the character killed as well? Kajune (talk) 18:16, July 12, 2017 (UTC)

Demons
You created a lot of demon pages recently but you didn't add any to the "known demons" section in the Demons page. I insist you do that next time. Kajune (talk) 16:45, May 31, 2017 (UTC)

Looks like I have a skill in naming demons. XD Kajune (talk) 17:09, May 31, 2017 (UTC)

Anyway, did you like the pictures I added? Kajune (talk) 04:44, June 1, 2017 (UTC)

Can you give your opinion on this. Zane T 69 (talk) 01:48, June 16, 2017 (UTC)

Sounds good, go for it. Zane T 69 (talk) 18:13, July 10, 2017 (UTC)

Alright, it's actually similar to this, so it shouldn't be an issue. Zane T 69 (talk) 22:38, July 10, 2017 (UTC)

Still. Whenever you're ready to start, go ahead. Zane T 69 (talk) 23:10, July 10, 2017 (UTC)

I agree with you. I've even considered blocking him for inserting gibberish into articles and lowering the wikis quality. If you want to delete them, I won't stop you, but just make sure you remove the links going to and from them. Zane T 69 (talk) 14:16, July 11, 2017 (UTC)

I have no idea whatsoever, you might wanna contact wikia via Special:Contact. Zane T 69 (talk) 14:21, July 15, 2017 (UTC)

Go ahead, you don't need permission for something like that. Zane T 69 (talk) 13:49, July 18, 2017 (UTC)

I really suck at page creating, but I can usually fix them if that makes sense. I'm glad the issues fixed and everythings working for you. Zane T 69 (talk) 23:26, July 18, 2017 (UTC)

One week, up to a month. I usually go for a month to show them the most severe consequence to snap them out of bad behavior. Zane T 69 (talk) 04:14, July 22, 2017 (UTC)

I understand your frustration and that some people just can't be reached, but we have a block policy that is quite effective. It can block repeat offenders for years (total) if they don't behave, while still giving them chances to change. Zane T 69 (talk) 14:40, July 22, 2017 (UTC)

If you're refering to the Karen Singer edit, then that was blatantly unconstructive. His others are okay, nothing exceptional, but worthwhile edits. His Fred Jones edit was speculative, so was the Psychic one. The first was blatantly false, the others were personal opinion. If you want to block him for a month, you can. Zane T 69 (talk) 23:59, July 22, 2017 (UTC)

What other guy? Zane T 69 (talk) 00:27, July 23, 2017 (UTC)

Ah. I think Doctor actually behaves better, quite a few of his edits are decent. Zane T 69 (talk) 00:47, July 23, 2017 (UTC)

Why did you remove information with a cited source and a reference? Zane T 69 (talk) 21:05, July 23, 2017 (UTC)

Okay. It was the Supernatural: Wayward Sisters page, but I assumed it was an accident. Zane T 69 (talk) 21:20, July 23, 2017 (UTC)

Parent Tab thing
I'm not very good at this, and so far, I think I'll only be able to create a new page under the Major Kills tab, which will end up like this: "Dean Winchester/Major Kills". If you don't mind, I can paste and copy info from the "Killed by Dean Winchester" page onto this new one. What do you think? Kajune (talk) 12:12, July 24, 2017 (UTC)

Nevermind....got it to work. ;D Kajune (talk) 12:59, July 24, 2017 (UTC)

I guess you're okay with the way Dean's page is now, or do you prefer the original version? Kajune (talk) 19:00, July 24, 2017 (UTC)

Do you have any ideas for future Rollbacks? Kajune and Touchinos are pretty much my only two ideas, and we really need more of them to police the wiki. Zane T 69 (talk) 00:26, August 15, 2017 (UTC)

Yes, I mean those with the rights. We need more of them, so we need to pool a list of candidates and then evaluate them. Zane T 69 (talk) 00:37, August 15, 2017 (UTC)

Touchinos does great work. What's wrong with Kajune's page creation? Zane T 69 (talk) 00:45, August 15, 2017 (UTC)

Alright, I'll contact them. Zane T 69 (talk) 00:56, August 15, 2017 (UTC)

Goodbye Stranger Gaff
You corrected an edit of mine to Goodbye Stranger. Sorry. I was binge watching in the middle of the night and must have gotten confused. I must add reference to the Angel Tablet on the Torn and Frayed page. Megstiel, Good Omens fan (talk) 12:30, August 17, 2017 (UTC)

Key of the Order of Letters
I changed Key of the Order of Letters article and you reverted it back to its previous state.

While the meaning of the sentence can be gleaned, from a gramatical and factual point of view it's a mess. What about the British Men of Letters? They still existed after Henry's death, even if the Winchesters didn't know about them (after all, the wikia is written from an omnipresent point of view, not theirs). Furthermore, he was not a Men of Letter. He was a Man of Letters, or a member of the Men of Letters, not a Men of Letter. This grammatical error is what bought the page to my attention.

"although the confrontation resulted into the death of Henry, the last surviving Men of Letter, and the temporary incapacitation of the Knight of Hell." suggests that the incapacitation of Abaddon is a bad thing, which it is clearly not. It is the reason that the Winchesters were successful in the first place. For the sentence structure to make sense, the reference to Abaddon should be removed, placed before the 'although' or made to fit into the setence that shows it is a continuation of the start of the sentence, not the digression after the 'although'. I did the latter, as it seemed the easiest way to retain as much of the original sentence.

Of course, I should have gotten rid of the 'the' in front of 'temporarily'. However, my reasons for editing still stand. I could have undone your edit immediately, but that probably would have started a useless edit-war. If you suggest a better phrasing of the sentence than my own, then edit away, but reverting the sentence back to its original state is nonsensical. It's both factually incorrect and hard to understand.

You've changed some of my other edits recently and honestly I understand where you're coming from with them (at least enough not to bother arguing my case in the latter one, as much as it annoys me while watching the episode, and you were definitely correct the first time), but this is different. Megstiel, Good Omens fan (talk) 16:21, August 23, 2017 (UTC)

After reviewing it, I find that I support Megstiel's edit and his reasoning. His edit was worth-while, IMO. Zane T 69 (talk) 16:50, August 23, 2017 (UTC)

I actually don't know what other categories to file those under, but they logically can't be filed under Rituals and Spells, because they aren't either. Did you see the above two messages? Zane T 69 (talk) 16:39, August 24, 2017 (UTC)

Sorry that I didn't reply, I had to do some personal stuff. All your ideas sound good, I especially like the Cures category idea. I guess, since you aren't opposing the matter, then I'll restore Megstiel's contested edit. I actually don't know what other categories to file those under, but they logically can't be filed under Rituals and Spells, because they aren't either. Did you see the above two messages? Zane T 69 (talk) 18:29, August 24, 2017 (UTC)

Sorry about that, I'm having a bad day. You are doing great work though. Zane T 69 (talk) 19:30, August 24, 2017 (UTC)

Sounds good, I personally like "Cures" over "Curing". Zane T 69 (talk) 00:51, August 25, 2017 (UTC)

Jeremy Frost and Lily Sunder
Actually there is a connection between them because they both lost the ability to dream, only in different ways. Or do you not pay attention to episodes? The Inner Hate(talk) August 29, 2017 (UTC)

An assistance
Hey WG18, I hope you are doing well... I realized that you have been working so hard through the Wiki, I appreciate that, great job. So, I am back again and wanted to ask you if there's anything I can help you with? SeraphLucifer (talk) 22:38, September 2, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer
 * Nothing that I can think of at the moment, thanks. Ask Zane though. He might have something.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 00:00, September 3, 2017 (UTC)

Soulless Category
Hey WG18, I think angels shouldn't be counted as soulless. SeraphLucifer (talk) 17:51, September 5, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

I agree, the sad part is I OK'ed the Category creation with the understand of it being humans who were soulless. Zane T 69 (talk) 18:16, September 5, 2017 (UTC)

Why was this done? You removed quite a bit of info. Zane T 69 (talk) 00:26, September 8, 2017 (UTC)

Ah, my bad. Zane T 69 (talk) 01:21, September 8, 2017 (UTC)

Discussions
Hello!

I am a member of staff at FANDOM and I noticed that your community was not yet using Discussions, a new feature we developed for our communities last year. We have enabled Discussions on all of our newer communities and are in the process of manually enabling it on already-established willing communities.

Discussions is a feature that lives in it's own environment on the community that users can use to post questions, thoughts, images, links and even videos. They can upvote posts and even share them on social media. Unlike forums, Discussions is available on our dedicated community mobile apps which allows both mobile and desktop users the ability to post in real time with each other. Users can edit their posts for the first 24 hours, but Admins and Moderators can edit posts anytime. Users can report posts they feel do not comply with our guidelines, or that of the community. Admins and Moderators can remove them. We give you the tools you need. Since the introduction of Discussions, we have seen a pretty big increase in mobile views and community interaction. You can find additional information on Discussions here.

Your community already has an app available to users. When we enable Discussions for desktop, we would enable it for mobile as well. Our non-app mobile skin does not have Discussions available to it. so mobile users would need to download and install the dedicated app to participate.

Let me know if your community would like to have Discussions enabled and I can take care of it for you. If you have any questions or concerns, please let me know.

Thanks! Pinkachu ( talk ) 00:13, September 14, 2017 (UTC)

(message edited to reflect the fact that a dedicated app is already available Pinkachu ( talk ) 18:25, September 14, 2017 (UTC))


 * Admin Zane T 69 brought up a concern regarding a lack of staff for Moderation. My reply is here  Pinkachu ( talk ) 17:08, September 14, 2017 (UTC)

Asmodeus
Hey WG18, hope you are doing fine... As I know/heard the guy in white suit is Asmodeus in the S13 Promo. Am I wrong or wasn't that confirmed? SeraphLucifer (talk) 17:30, September 22, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Werewolf
Thanks for undoing the edit. It didn't seem to work when I did it, so I was about to resort to doing it manually. Dtol (talk) 22:19, October 8, 2017 (UTC)

Dr Gaines
Why did you revert my edit? Whenever the first death on screen of a certain species is seen on tv, i see it in the trivia section of said character, for example, the angel Uriel and the demon Tom. The Inner Hate (talk) 1:24 am, October 11, 2017 (UTC)

Season 13 Title Card for the main page ( just click the number ):

[]

Omniscience2k (talk) 02:39, October 13, 2017 (UTC)

Sorry for the Edit War on the Jack (Nephilim) page
My apologies, I didn't intend to start an edit war with you. My only point was that info on one character's use of their new powers or being leveled up is irrelevant to the same of another's despite the latter being the benefactor. What I was trying to explain was that it would be more accurate to merge the info under Power Granting as the power negation, "increased" super strength and advanced pryokinesis had been "granted" to Cass by Jack. The only logic to include a description of Cass's use of those respective powers for Jack's own in his Power and Abilities section would be if it had instead been "Power Transference" or "Power Channeling" as than for instance, Cass would have literally possessed Jack's strength to overpower Dagon. On a final it would help me to better understand why you undo any of my edits in future if you could give a clearer explanation why you disagree with them as "Stop changing that when its been accepted on here for months" is not a valid reason why it should remain unchanged. Just because something was accepted months ago doesn't mean it's correct now nor can't be changed to at least improve it. Again, my apologies. 70.93.90.147 09:19, October 14, 2017 (UTC)

Gordon Walker
Did there use to be a personality section on the Gordon Walker page? --Pokemonfan201 (talk) 01:28, October 16, 2017 (UTC)

Cause I about a year ago there was.--Pokemonfan201 (talk) 02:06, October 16, 2017 (UTC)

I dunno, sorry. --Pokemonfan201 (talk) 02:25, October 16, 2017 (UTC)

Angels
I found a problem with the angel page where if you click on the types of angels box it immediately sends you down the the known angesl. I can not find out why this is happening Thetwindler (talk) 18:25, October 25, 2017 (UTC)

If you want to revert, that's okay. I trust your judgement. Zane T 69 (talk) 00:16, October 29, 2017 (UTC)

Council
Hey WG18, hope you are doing fine... Can we gather all active admins, I'd like to speak about something. SeraphLucifer (talk) 20:26, November 4, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

I changed my mind, other admins are kind of busy so I'll speak all of you one by one. Let me know when you are avaiable, thanks... SeraphLucifer (talk) 17:50, November 5, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Just let me know when you are avaiable, then we enter chat, it is real easy tho. SeraphLucifer (talk) 21:37, November 5, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Are you avaiable atm? I'll be on chat. SeraphLucifer (talk) 22:43, November 5, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Alright, I'll be sleeping then, it 2 AM here, we'll talk tomorrow. Enjoy your dinner. SeraphLucifer (talk) 22:47, November 5, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Re: Billie's new status
I don't think we can call her a Horseman unless she states she is one. We only know that she is now the being who controls the flow of life and death in the Universe. Receiving a ring did not turn her into another being. It gave her status as in Dean's case. Otherwise Dean should've been a Horseman since he wore the ring once. SeraphLucifer (talk) 16:20, November 10, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

I agree with Seraph, calling her the new Death is okay, because it's confirmed. But the Horsemen are basically defunct and she hasn't actually been called one, so that's speculation or outright false information. Zane T 69 (talk) 16:26, November 10, 2017 (UTC)

If you have proof that he's broken rules then warn/block him. I haven't seen anything wrong with his edits, but you are more knowledgeable on the show. Zane T 69 (talk) 15:45, November 16, 2017 (UTC)

undone edites
Why was my edit on First war undone? The show said plainly that The empty was around before the darkness. No reason was given for the undue either so I am left wondering why it was undone. I can't fix mistakes if none are listed.

ThomasNealy (talk) 05:03, November 16, 2017 (UTC)

I changed the topic name becasue I noticed you undid alot of my edits with now reason given at all. the onlhy one that you gave was for Primordials and you stated that it was all ready agreed that he did not go there. I looked at the talk page before I made that edit and nothing was mentioned about that at all. If a dission was made by the Admis and mods it should have been listed on the talk page.

ThomasNealy (talk) 05:07, November 16, 2017 (UTC)

Even being an Admin you still must follow wiki rules and the rules state that a reason must begiven for all rolebacks and undues. It is how we learn how to edit better after all. Just undoing the edit with out explination teaches nothing and is frankly a slap in the face for those of us who are trying to help. After reading your own talk page I see that other Admins have said the same thing to you before. Also no need to be rude becasue I made a few typos above. Telling my to learn how to spell is insulting. As it is I would still like an explination on why the undue was done on every edit I made tonight. With out an explanation to what was wrong with them I do not know what was wrong. If you are just going to undue every thing that users out side prolific editers do with out explanation, then what is the point of haveing an open wiki like this?

ThomasNealy (talk) 05:26, November 16, 2017 (UTC)

Troubles editing on the Jack page
I ran in to some issues with editing the Jack page It kept giving me errors and ended up doing the same edit twice. Could you check to make sure I did not break any thing and that I did not leave or take away things that should not have been?

ThomasNealy (talk) 08:13, November 17, 2017 (UTC)

I am looking forward to your addition on Jack,  so I know what is considered ok and what is poorly written. I'm sure I will get the hang of it one day.

ThomasNealy (talk) 08:22, November 19, 2017 (UTC)

Demons
The info is listed twice in the same section once in a tab (tab name other) and once below it. Does it need to be listed twice in the same section? Is that not redundant and unneeded? ThomasNealy (talk) 23:35, November 20, 2017 (UTC)