User blog comment:EmpyreanSmoke/Bureaucrat/@comment-3045936-20141117053219/@comment-3045936-20141117055521

Well, let me give you some examples of common arguements and lets see what your stance to resolve them would be. 1. The always famous God vs Death problem: Some users think just cause God in the real world is credited completely all powerful, knowing and perfectly good that it's ok to use that to say Death can't reap him IN THE SERIES. But, Death has shown to only have a general cosmic awareness of the universe to God's Omniscience. And has made unclear comments about whether or not he can or can't reap God or what the requirements are.

2. Archangels, Leviathans, And Eve: Many seem to nit pick at every chance to say a Leviathan or Eve couldn't harm an Angel that is an Archangel. Where does it show or is hinted that? Despite all the power Archangels have Eve can unplugged a powerful angel (Castiel) from his power. And Leviathans are immune to some if not all to Angel mojo. But, we aren't sure so I leave open to that we are unsure what the case is until further notice.

3. Powers: A common arguement, is powers. Like which are the same power just used different like my stance on Telekinesis vs Biokinesis blog, or are simply a different method like how time travel is a method of chronokinesis, or are separate powers superhuman senses and supernatural preceptions.

Now you still have my vote. But here is my stance especially with the first example. Regardless of personal ideals or faith, I try to remain unbias. This is a wiki to make information on the series Supernatural. And not nit pick ever source or sentence in an episodes script to justify my personal beliefs or ideals on the series.