User blog comment:EmpyreanSmoke/Consensus of the Weaknesses/@comment-3030445-20151013100543

The purpose of wikis are to catalog information on particular topics in an encyclopedic matter. This means it should be written without bias (should not be affected by how you feel about something), and should generally try to avoid speculation, including using evidence that may be in the show to draw a conclusion about what you think may happen. While this should be the same for all information on the Supernatural Wikia, it is especially true of weaknesses, which this situation specifically seems to be about. Weakness sections should not be about "who would win in a fight", but about what can kill any given supernatural being. Who would win in a fight is something people just want to debate about, and is heavily influenced by opinions. Generally, saying that all of one creature can kill all of another can be quite inaccurate, as most species have various members who are stronger and others who are not as strong. Black-eyes demons vs crossroads demons vs white-eyed demons vs Knights of Hell, humans vs hunters vs witches, werewolves vs pure-bloods vs the alpha werewolf, angels (grunts like Samandriel) vs cherubim vs rit zien vs seraphim vs grigori vs reapers vs archangels, etc., and that's not even taking into account: if an angel or demon loads himself up with thousands then millions of souls, or a human has the Mark of Cain, the number of followers a pagan has, magical enhancements, etc.

There should be no "possibly" or "since x then y or even k", only what was specifically shown in the comics, novels, official companion books, at a panel at a convention, in an interview, or on the show. And just because we haven't seen Death kill a vampire or a werewolf doesn't mean he can't, but it also doesn't mean we should catalog it here, as this was never shown. If there was a scene like that, however, of course it should be noted.

This sort of debate is what the blogs are for, as opinions and speculation like this should not be expressed on the site in articles, as general readers of the site will not want to see who or what person 1 thinks could win in a fight compared to what person 2 thinks. Over the past couple days there have been a couple blogs devoted to this sort of "who would win/who is stronger" debates, which is probably the best place for the discussions to occur. This also doesn't have the content of articles fluctuate because one person (or group of people) wants to add their opinion to the article, and another wants their opinion on the article instead. One minute an article might say one thing, and the next it would not because someone just changed it to fit their opinion, which will lead to readers to either be misled by what they read here, or be mistrustful of the Supernatural Wikia.

And with speculation in general, it is also best placed in blogs as general readers may not want to read someone's ideas about what is/may be happening. Stuff like Season 11 spoilers, what's God and Darkness's endgame, and Crowley is God? are great examples of using blogs to speculate about stuff, while not misleading readers who only care about the canon of Supernatural.