User talk:Touchinos

That template appeared to be vastly outdated and is being considered for deletion, having already been replaced. Zane T 69 (talk) 16:06, February 8, 2017 (UTC)

Your GIF was deleted, we do not allow the uploading of personal photos; IE photos not for articles. Zane T 69 (talk) 15:19, February 24, 2017 (UTC)

Okay. I wasn't intending to be rude, I was just doing my scan through the edits since my last visit and was incredibly busy and being brief and blunt. Zane T 69 (talk) 16:19, February 24, 2017 (UTC)

Warning
Once again, you uploaded personal photos, twice. They were deleted, further infractions will be met with a three day block. This is an official warning. Zane T 69 (talk) 15:39, February 25, 2017 (UTC)

Perhaps, but logical. Most users don't stay here long, and leave behind huge messes to be cleaned up. I spent two weeks purging the wiki of those pictures, even discovered some rather cruel pictures mocking tragedies. Zane T 69 (talk) 15:47, February 25, 2017 (UTC)

I know the rule may not make sense to you, but it keeps the wiki clean and easier to run. You can use pre-existing gifs and pictures though. The rule makes sure people focus on the project, and not having a webpage. Zane T 69 (talk) 17:04, February 25, 2017 (UTC)

Short links
In the future, please try using short links. especially on long and hard to load pages. Zane T 69 (talk) 03:09, March 10, 2017 (UTC)

Click this link . That link in the appearance section of the Castiel page. Zane T 69 (talk) 03:28, March 10, 2017 (UTC)

No! That wasn't a warning! Sorry, sometimes I forget to create new sections. I remedied that. You won't get in trouble for using long links, it's just work for others to change. Zane T 69 (talk) 03:34, March 10, 2017 (UTC)

Efforts
Hey Touchinos, I realize your contributions and efforts here and I wanted to thank you for being the part of this community. Good job! SeraphLucifer (talk) 03:23, March 11, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Re:Winchesters Full Names
I checked that video before but couldn't see anything :/. Still can't tho. SeraphLucifer (talk) 13:40, March 22, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Dude excellent work :D SeraphLucifer (talk) 13:57, March 22, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

The template you linked too is years out of date and non-portable; meaning it can't be viewed on mobile devices. I'm glad you asked, because had you replaced the portable templates with non-portable ones it would have been vandalism. Zane T 69 (talk) 15:02, April 6, 2017 (UTC)

Re:New Template
If properly done, sure. I'd support it. SeraphLucifer (talk) 12:55, April 30, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Re
I don't think that's a good idea. Just doing headshots seems dumb and it doesn't really seem like enough to capture the characters. That's just promotional stuff anyway.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 16:22, May 3, 2017 (UTC)

Actor's Pages
Sure thing Touchinos, it would be good to use it on these pages. Thanks for uploading :D SeraphLucifer (talk) 18:56, May 3, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

I agree with that.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 22:58, May 3, 2017 (UTC)

Re
Personally I don't mind, but I'm rather new at this Admin thing. I'd ask Zane if I were you about that. I think for something like that there has to be a vote or something on it.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 17:10, May 4, 2017 (UTC)

It's unnecessary, our main characters are rarely ever in relationships, and even then they don't last. The current relationship page set up is easy to manage and edit, that template would create unnecessary complexity when a simple, effective solution works much better. Zane T 69 (talk) 01:30, May 5, 2017 (UTC)

Hi. I've noticed you revert vandalism quite often and wanted to suggest that you contact Caleb to request Rollback rights. If you don't have any prior experience as a Rollback, that's fine I'll answer any questions you have about it and do my best to make sure you understand it. Zane T 69 (talk) 13:40, May 14, 2017 (UTC)

With Rollback rights you can undo multiple bad edits in one go, but it undoes every edit they made in a row. For example if the first is good, but the next four are bad you need to manually revert, or revert all and restore the good part.

Without Rollback rights you can only undo one bad edit, leaving the previous bad ones unchanged unless you manually revert the edit. Rollback rights are basically undo on steroids. Zane T 69 (talk) 14:47, May 15, 2017 (UTC)

12x22
The episode aired now? Do you know a good streaming site? I am so curious for the finale XD SeraphLucifer (talk) 00:18, May 19, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Thanks a lot mate. Appreciated. SeraphLucifer (talk) 00:27, May 19, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Hey
This is not your wiki and you don't make the calls here. Everybody can edit. Not just you. How about you stop being the boss of a certain page and start showing some respect alright.HotheadedBirdy (talk) 02:13, May 19, 2017 (UTC)

Re
Just wanted to apologize about yesterday and I am very sorry that I mistaken you for one of those immature editors. I didn't know you are the wiki's best editors until now. HotheadedBirdy (talk) 21:19, May 19, 2017 (UTC)

Can you provide sources/references on the Season 13 page? It might stop some edit warring. Zane T 69 (talk) 22:29, May 19, 2017 (UTC)

Parent tab Template
Hey, if you have any time, please share your opinion on the current format of Dean's page. Thanks! Kajune (talk) 15:23, July 25, 2017 (UTC)

how were you able to edit castiel's page

Hey. I was wondering if you would be interested in becoming a Rollback? A user who who can revert multiple bad edits in a row, all with one click. Zane T 69 (talk) 01:00, August 15, 2017 (UTC)

All you need to do is post on Caleb's wall and request the rights. Zane T 69 (talk) 01:16, August 15, 2017 (UTC)

Re: Rollback
You have been granted use of the rollback tool. A rollback is a quick option for reverting a group of edits by a user on a single page and should only be used in the reverting of vandalism; good-faith edits should be undone with an explanation in the edit summary. Cheers. Calebchiam Talk 06:02, August 15, 2017 (UTC)

Re: Spoilers
That... would explain why he's set to return. Maybe our Castiel remains dead and the alternate Castiel is the one we see from here... KillRoy231 (talk) 02:16, August 24, 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for telling me. You are free to revert those edits if you'd like and I'll be doing the same. Zane T 69 (talk) 14:25, September 25, 2017 (UTC)

Hello. You have proven yourself a reliable and trustworthy user, as such, if you're interested: you can request Rollback rights from our resident B-Crat. Zane T 69 (talk) 20:42, October 3, 2017 (UTC)

My bad. I didn't see that. Zane T 69 (talk) 22:40, October 3, 2017 (UTC)

Michael & Bobby
In my eyes, these are the main pages, while the alternate universe ones are subs. I mean, no one has outright stated otherwise so.... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Kajune (talk) 09:17, October 4, 2017 (UTC)

Hey Touchinos, Michael and Bobby pages should include the alternate version of themselves since they are the main ones. Please don't remove them :) SeraphLucifer (talk) 14:02, October 4, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Hey. The user changing official summaries is making them copies of the original summary, at least I'm fairly certain of that. Zane T 69 (talk) 14:56, October 16, 2017 (UTC)

If they don't match the official info from CW, then it's fair game for reverting. I would need evidence of the users wrong doing because it looks official. Zane T 69 (talk) 15:55, October 16, 2017 (UTC)

RE: "Rising Son" Summary
Hi, Touchinos, I understand the summary is officially from the CW, but you are missing my point. I just looked up the press release for "Rising Son" on SpoilerTV.com and the summary does indeed say "he sets his sights set on Jack" as you said, but that is grammatically incorrect. The correct grammar would be "has his sights set on" (which I feel to be the more likely) or "sets his sights on" Jack. This is clearly an error on The CW's part when the summary was written. Now I suggest this be brought up to Zane T 69 to decide whether it's necessary to correct such a grammatical error made by an official source or at least if it should be acknowledged in Trivia on the episode page just like whenever there is an error in the series itself. I look forward to your response. 70.93.90.147 07:42, October 17, 2017 (UTC)

No, that doesn't mean we have to check the summary of each episode for more grammatical errors as that would be impractical and if there are any than they can be gradually corrected by users over time. But that also doesn't mean we shouldn't correct this error as that is flawed logic and lazy. Anyway, I am moving forward to bring this up to Zane T 69 as again, I would like to see if he at least agrees with me that the error should be acknowledged in the page's trivia. 70.93.90.147 08:36, October 17, 2017 (UTC)

RE:Wiki Layout
It wasn't like this 20 minutes ago. Kajune (talk) 12:50, October 23, 2017 (UTC)

The wiki layout was not like this when I had been editing over an hour ago, so I am as puzzled as you are, but I don't like the new layout either. Kevingr had recently been adding more photos to galleries and Chayne Doss had just been editing on some pages according to the wiki activity, do you think either of them may have changed it, if only by accident? 70.93.90.147 13:49, October 23, 2017 (UTC)

My current suspects for the layout change are Seraph and wikia. Only Admins, B-Crats, and wikia can change that. Zane T 69 (talk) 14:44, October 23, 2017 (UTC)

I contacted wikia and either they fixed it or it was merely a glitch or bug that fixed or resolved itself. Zane T 69 (talk) 01:57, October 24, 2017 (UTC)

We don't allow the uploading of personal photos. I had to delete them, I can't make an exception for one person and I don't even have the authority to do so. Zane T 69 (talk) 15:28, October 25, 2017 (UTC)

If you are going to replace the ones on the Kevin Tran and Charlie pages, then I'll restore them. You should have about ten hours to do that, sorry but I read the situation the best I could and it looked like you were ignoring the rules. I'll go restore the two photos before I go to bed. Zane T 69 (talk) 03:54, October 26, 2017 (UTC)

Castiel
Before we get into an editing war, I have to say my part. I just find it a bit ridiculous to label him as "alive" just because he's in The Empty. I mean, for all we know that's were Angels go when they die, so it's a bit jumping the gun to say he's alive, no? I mean, we saw the angel blade stab him. So unless this whole time the blades banish angels and not kill...It's a bit early to say he's alive until the next episode or so, if the show says one way or the other. It just doesn't make sense to be that he'd be alive when we clearly saw him die on-screen. It's not like we label every soul seen in Heaven (like Bobby) alive despite their physical deaths, no?

Just wanted my side of the argument clear. Gabriel456 (talk) 01:52, October 27, 2017 (UTC)

Your Work
Hey Touchinos, I just wanted to say that I admire your work, you are doing great and contributing perfectly. Images, TV ratings and your edits are awesome. Appreciated! SeraphLucifer (talk) 22:05, October 29, 2017 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Hey Touchinos. I just assumed that when a charachter appears in the tilte credits very clearly as a GUEST STAR that you should list them in your wiki as a GUEST STAR.Coastcom (talk) 04:55, November 10, 2017 (UTC)

Never too late to fix a mistake. It was listed wrong - what can I say - I corrected it.Coastcom (talk) 05:04, November 10, 2017 (UTC)

You should list the guest stars properly - it's just silly that you don't. Lacks credibility.Coastcom (talk) 16:38, November 10, 2017 (UTC)

Listen, don't get upset, it doesn't say -"recurring guest stars" - It says "guest stars" - I could point out a bunch of other inconsistencies too -  it is semantics - but I really don't care, I was just pointing it out that it was technically wrong in the production world - your justification is fine I guess, albeit not correct - don't worry about it. It just didn't make any sense and you were taking it personally for some odd reason. Really...don't worry about it.Coastcom (talk) 16:58, November 10, 2017 (UTC)

Hi Touchinos,

Is there a list of the posting guidlines anywhere so that if we are to make contributions, we don't run into this kind of misunderstanding? It is not clear in any way that wiki has different naming conventions than the rest of the production/entertainment industry.Coastcom (talk) 18:25, November 10, 2017 (UTC)

About the category Strongest of Species
Like i said in my edition, there's no proof that Jesse is the strongest Cambion, he is just the only Cambion that ever appear in the show, and if you think about, if Lilith, Abaddon or Dagon had a child, this child will stronger than Jesse since Jesse is son of a regular Black-eyed Demon, and Lilith and the others are high-tier demons, its like Jane and Jack, until Jack was introduced Jane was the only Nephilim in the show, and since Jack is son of a high-tier angel (Lucifer), he is stronger than Jane who is daughter of a regular angel, and about Crowley, i added this category on him because compareted to others crossroad demons he is the most powerful, even his natural/smoke form is red, all other demons (including others crossroads demons) has/had black smoke. Doctor49 (talk) 19:16, November 20, 2017 (UTC)

Re: Sorry for the time I took for answer, but by your logic, should not all creatures that were the only ones shown of their respective species, like Shōjō, Disaster Demon, Rawhead, etc be added as the strongest of the species too? And you think that others crossroad demons have the ability to explode someone with a snap of fingers or teleport directly to Hell or Earth (Ability described as being possessed only by high-tier demons in the demons page) like Crowley? Doctor49 (talk) 02:54, November 27, 2017 (UTC)

Why have you deleted my sentence ?
Hey. I don't understand why you have deleted my sentence without eplanation. I just wanted to add something funny in the trivia. I often want to write some things but I speak English badly. Please explain. Thanks.

Sandrine Sand (talk) 15:31, November 29, 2017 (UTC)

RE: Suggestion
It's not really a pressing concern in my opinion, but if you can get a few others to support it, go ahead and proceed. Zane T 69 (talk) 15:06, December 1, 2017 (UTC)

You can post on Seraphs or WG18's wall and ask them what they think about the idea. I don't think this matter would require a forum to gather more consensus. Zane T 69 (talk) 15:26, December 1, 2017 (UTC)

If this passes, let me know. My bot can replace these categories.

Orion ( T - B -C) 16:14, December 1, 2017 (UTC)

Episode Summeries
Hi I was wondering if you knew where to find the official summaries of each episode. I was talking to Zane about it and he pointed me in your direction. I have volunteered to take on the project of making sure all the summaries match the official release. ThomasNealy (talk) 18:18, December 11, 2017 (UTC)

None of those seem to be CW (CBS/ Warner Brothers) affiliated sites though. I think Zane wanted something that the CW put out. I was thinking of seeing what the dvd inserts have for them. ThomasNealy (talk) 03:24, December 12, 2017 (UTC)

I'll use the Futon one. They cite the press release, I wish I had the actual press release though so I could cite it on the page. would just citing "The WB press release" (for earlier seasons) and "The CW press release" ( for later seasons) be acceptable citation? I'll worry more about it tomarow I'm off to bed now. ThomasNealy (talk) 03:41, December 12, 2017 (UTC)

I have the main season 1 page redone I will work on the individual episodes in a bit. Can you take a look at it before I put this version live. I have it in a sand box right now. Click Here --ThomasNealy (talk) 17:57, December 12, 2017 (UTC)

Are the capitalized letter part of the press release? If they are then they would have to stay. Zane wants them to be as close to the official summaries as possible I even left in the typos and added a note for them. I'm not sure on the links though. I think they help new members or people new to the show. For those of us that have been watching for 13 years they may seem pointless as we already know what the Summaries are talking about, but a new watcher might not. ThomasNealy (talk) 02:35, December 13, 2017 (UTC)

Season pages
Please stop editing the season page summeries. They are exactly how they are supposed to be I have allready done seasons 1 and 2 and am working on the rest. Zane allready looked it over. ThomasNealy (talk) 03:28, December 14, 2017 (UTC)

You can do the rest of the Season page if you want. But leave the summaries as they are. The cells can be changed to. But you undid all the summaries including the notes, and links. I spent two days working on all that. Not cool man. The summaries should be placed on there, errors and all with the notes saying what the errors were. ThomasNealy (talk) 03:36, December 14, 2017 (UTC)