User blog comment:EmpyreanSmoke/Seraphim and "Common" Angels/@comment-24834479-20150218182859/@comment-11331875-20150220052400

I'm sorry, but you can't make such a massive change to lore on the wiki on such a flimsy basis. If the writers intended for "normal" angels to be seraphim, they would have mentioned it in interviews, in the books, somewhere. You're proposing that we change everything based on your interpretation of two sentences, which no one else on this wiki agrees with but which you continue to push as being the case, contrary to our objections.

Your entire case is built on two sentences that have other, likelier interpretations: Castiel's mention of being a seraph (which is the only time seraphim are ever mentioned on the show), and Castiel's description of the cupid as being "a lower order of angel," "cherub, third-class." You are assuming that the only types of angels that exist are the ones we've seen on-screen. If we had assumed what you are saying back in Season 5, that wouldn't have included reapers or Rit Zien because they hadn't appeared on-screen then. In-universe, there are more angel types than appear, other classes of cherubs than the third class among them.

You are saying that we need to argue against your facts, or else accept them. That's not the case. The reason that no one is participating in this discussion is that there is nothing to discuss. You are the one who needs to gather solid evidence (cited from the writers, the actors, someone from the show with the authority to dole out canon information) supporting what you say. If you can find that, everyone will agree with you and we will make the changes.