User talk:SeraphLucifer

Welcome
Hi, welcome to ! Thanks for your edit to the User blog:EmpyreanSmoke/Supernatural Q&A page. Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help you with anything! Also note that we are in the process of converting articles written in the present tense to the past tense. So you are welcome to edit any such article you come across. Once again, Welcome! Twilight Despair 5 (talk) 07:49, September 13, 2015 (UTC)

Dont argue about what you think is stronger in the article. If it was specifically shown in the show, then put it but dont guess and dont argue about it in the article. The fact that you thin it might be possible or unlikely should mean we dont actually now what can really be true and it shouldnt be in article. --SPNfan7908 (talk) 22:36, October 28, 2015 (UTC)

Archangels vs Leviathans
I recognized that you deleted Eve and leviathans from the archangel pages. While I tend to say archangels in their true form can't be killed by anyone besides God or The Darkness, I fully support to add Leviathans as a weakness to the archangel pages, which doesn't mean a leviathan would always win against them, (as I said the archangels know a lot of spells that could probably very well be dangerous for even higher leviathans, for example set them into a coma, ...) it just means that Leviathans could kill them. As there is no consensus on that topic, I think it would be the best to collect all the arguments from the weaknesses blog and add them to the pages. It would satisfy both sides and hopefully prevent further edit warring. After a long discussion, we were unable to achieve a consensus and according to this wikia policy "The topic has been open for a long period of time and the discussion has reached a standstill with no sign of consensus forming. The topic should be closed, on a basis of no consensus." We should close the topic on a basis of no consensus. Lambda1 (talk) 16:13, October 29, 2015 (UTC)

Send me links
Send me links of the people, I'll decide from there what to do. Thank you, for bring this to me.&#91;&#91;User:Twilight Despair 5&#124;&#93;&#93; (&#91;&#91;The God of Creation&#93;&#93;) (talk) 20:10, November 1, 2015 (UTC)

Ok not about what you messaged me from earlier. This message isn't about language changes or trolls. But Death was clear. Lucifer passed the Mark to Cain. Lucifer didn't have it in season 5. If he did no point for Michael to fight him. Even being as the good son. Lucifer would just come back. Their was only one Mark. It was undone by the spell. When Death said share he meant pass to someone else. As it was the Darkness' seal. So the owner of the Mark can give it to others. It was never copied. Now it's effects do last past it. Hence why Cain when killer crazy in season 10.&#91;&#91;User:Twilight Despair 5&#124;&#93;&#93; (&#91;&#91;The God of Creation&#93;&#93;) (talk) 03:42, November 2, 2015 (UTC)

I'll think about the Super Strength page. But about the Mark it was GIVEN to Deab. This isn't speculation. First off, if it was just copied Cain would have come back to life even killed from the first blade. As Death said (nothing) can kill the holder of the first curse. Also, yes Cain was back under its influence but he had the mark for thousands of years. Cain made the first blade he still could tap into its part a bit. But ultimately Dean was the current holder at that time. There has only ever been one mark, it was never copied. There are many counts of it being told it was passed from Lucifer-to-Cain-to-Dean.&#91;&#91;User:Twilight Despair 5&#124;&#93;&#93; (&#91;&#91;The God of Creation&#93;&#93;) (talk) 14:08, November 3, 2015 (UTC)

Ok explain this. Why did the spell to remove the mark only affect Dean? By your logic it it should have to been removed from all the holders both current and previous. The spell needed parts of the holder. Rowena used some of his hair to break the curse of the Mark. Cain might have regain the Mark as a reflect affect of holding the Blade. He was a demon made while holding the mark they didn't use any part of Lucifer or Cain in the spell. Dean was a human at that time. Cain might be able to be influence or share its power with the holder, if he gets his hands on the blade. But there is only one OWNER of the mark at a time.&#91;&#91;User:Twilight Despair 5&#124;&#93;&#93; (&#91;&#91;The God of Creation&#93;&#93;) (talk) 19:34, November 3, 2015 (UTC)

Forgot to sign, you last point. There is evidence Cain could tap into the Marks power to fuel the Blade's power while he held it. But, forums and the like are not to influence canon info here if they aren't from cast or crew. As of now the mark has only been transferred not copied and will be listed as such in articles. Until proven wrong beyond the shadow of a doubt. Also to prove my point. Death said he could remove (the) Mark, but to give it to someone else to keep the Darkness banned. He wouldn't have cared if Dean's was only a copy as breaking the copy wouldn't logically break the seal of the cage of the Darkness. Also it could something as simple as production error on giving Cain the mark on 10x14.&#91;&#91;User:Twilight Despair 5&#124;&#93;&#93; (&#91;&#91;The God of Creation&#93;&#93;) (talk) 22:03, November 3, 2015 (UTC)

I reviewed and I am opting to keep it the same.&#91;&#91;User:Twilight Despair 5&#124;&#93;&#93; (&#91;&#91;The God of Creation&#93;&#93;) (talk) 20:12, November 6, 2015 (UTC)

It's to late!
That is it Seraph Lucifer! I've told you to stop it but you refuse! You're worse than Abdelfadeel himself! Unlike you, When Abdelfadeel edits, it's without bias, and with arguments. You don't want to discuss this like a rational human being! I'm done.

172.101.67.105 22:09, November 12, 2015 (UTC)

OK. SeraphLucifer (talk) 22:14, November 12, 2015 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Knights and Archangels
Please stop reverting the Invulnerability page, as there is nothing suggesting the archangels can kill knights of hell. The lore states that the archangels needed the first blade to kill them, so this is actually evidence against your statement. Try not to revert things over 3 times in the future; talk it out on the talk pages. Thanks. EmpyreanSmoke (talk) 22:46, November 12, 2015 (UTC)

Alright boss SeraphLucifer (talk) 22:50, November 12, 2015 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

It was actually on the indestructablity page.

Issues
Man, you really have some issues! Just because somone disagrees with you, doesn't mean they hate you or are out to get you. They just disagree wuth you dude. No need to get offense man. Just chill out. 172.101.67.105 02:06, November 14, 2015 (UTC)

Death II
Don't worry, I deleted the page. EmpyreanSmoke (talk) 00:12, November 15, 2015 (UTC)

Response
Don't know if your watching my page but my response to you is there. Also, this message was left about you on an Adminstrator's talk page so your pissing other people off, not just me:

"I am having problems with the user known as SeraphLucifer. He broke the three revert rule. He keeps adding non-cannon information. He keeps saying Archangels can kill knights of hell. He doesn't even say possibly, to imply they possibly can, yet leaving the possibility they can't. He is saying they can for certain even though we've never seen a knight of hell be killed by anything but the 1st blade. I've repeatedly warned him to stop and put my reasoning for it . He refuses and just undoes my edits without argument whatsoever. His only argument, was something along the lines of "In the lore it says the archangels could kill them."

There are two major problems with this argument. The first being: the lore greatly differs from the show. For example Lucifer is a Cherub in the lore and Michael is a seraph. Yet, in the show, both are archangels. This is just one of many differences.

Number 2: Even if we do give him the benefit of the doubt. The Knights were created by the writers purely for plot. Their is absolutely no lore on The Knights whatsoever. So that's obviously a lie.

Please ban him as it is corrupting the wikia. Thank you."

Not very encouraging to have someone asking an Administrator to do that dude. That's not me either.--WarGrowlmon18 (talk) 20:40, November 16, 2015 (UTC)

Apology
Hey SeraphLucifer, I want to apologize for everything I said to you and my behavior torwards you. I had no right to say any of that and that was very rude of me. I was being very stubborn and rude.

Its k pal. SeraphLucifer (talk) 18:06, November 17, 2015 (UTC)SeraphLucifer

Computer.
Hey man! what happened to your computer?

Not online as much.
Hey man! What happened to your computer? Are you getting a new one? 168.169.25.92 05:37, December 2, 2015 (UTC)