User blog comment:EmpyreanSmoke/Consensus of the Weaknesses/@comment-26992577-20151012193930

I think we should include for any character a reference, that they can be killed by higher tier entities, especially: God, The Darkness, Death. Instead of including each one of them, it would be better just to name it "Higher-Forces/entities".

Another thing is the three- revert rule, it could be easily abused to include any sort of nonsense on any page. Let's say someone wants to include for example Wendigos as weaknesses for archangels. It has never been mentioned on the show, that wendigos could not kill archangels, right ? That's how some persons argue on this wiki and I don't think it is even remotely fair to apply the three-revert rule in such a case, assuming the person keeps adding wendigos as weaknesses for archangels. In such an extreme case, it would be even beyond any discussion for me, but where to draw the lines ? Can vampires kill archangels ? The alpha vamp ? Fairies ? Eve ? Castiel with 1000000 souls ? Castiel with 2000000 souls ? We can't only include things mentioned in the show, that would exclude even the simplest conclusions, for example: Angels can kill vampires. It was never mentioned on the show, we only saw Castiel killing Lenore and some other vampires/monsters in purgatoy, who knows if the other angels coould do it as well ? No mention => not including angels. That makes just in no way any reasonable sense. While it was never mentioned in the show, we can support the statements that angel can kill any vampire by applying reasonable deduction. The same goes for all other cases, as long as something is reasonable deductive, it's fine to include it on the wiki, although never mentioned in the show.