User blog comment:EmpyreanSmoke/Bureaucrat/@comment-3045936-20141122044022/@comment-107.77.75.88-20141123022516

Thank you. Since there really isn't a way to prove one or the other, how do you suggest we solve this? Since there is equal evidence for both sides, I would think it would be "innocent until proven guilty". I have explained what really happened, and that I am not a sock puppeteer. I can't really prove this is true (which it is), but since we can't prove that it isn't true either, shouldn't it be innocent until proven guilty?