User blog comment:123bante123/Can it reap them ?/@comment-3481504-20141205092608/@comment-3481504-20141206010959

No, please respond to my comment after this. And, no, not all terms (or any, for that matter) have to carry the same amount of baggage. The reasonableness of the usage of the term is the deciding-factor. If the writer describes their version of a vampire as a being with red eyes with predatory behaviors that feed on human blood, that is pliable, whereas a writer describing their "vampires" as intelligent muffins with the urge to hurl jellybeans at groundhogs is not using the term in a way that can fittingly co-align with the term. Same with "God." If the writers, as you say, made God into a being that's 1) mortal, and 2) limited, they're egregiously using the term and shouldn't call this being "God." However, God of the Supernatural universe is immortal, omnipotent and omniscient, but as I said, you're misinterpreting dialogue.